• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using an Internet-Based Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool to Improve Social-Cognitive Precursors of Physical Activity.使用基于互联网的乳腺癌风险评估工具改善身体活动的社会认知先兆因素。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Aug;37(6):657-669. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17699835. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
2
Internet-based physical activity intervention for women with a family history of breast cancer.针对有乳腺癌家族史女性的基于互联网的身体活动干预
Health Psychol. 2015 Dec;34S(0):1296-304. doi: 10.1037/hea0000307.
3
Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for sexual dysfunctions in women treated for breast cancer: design of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.基于互联网的乳腺癌女性性功能障碍认知行为疗法:一项多中心随机对照试验的设计
BMC Cancer. 2015 Apr 28;15:321. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1320-z.
4
A Web-based self-management exercise and diet intervention for breast cancer survivors: pilot randomized controlled trial.一项针对乳腺癌幸存者的基于网络的自我管理运动与饮食干预:试点随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Dec;51(12):1557-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 May 1.
5
(Cost-)effectiveness of an internet-based physical activity support program (with and without physiotherapy counselling) on physical activity levels of breast and prostate cancer survivors: design of the PABLO trial.基于互联网的体育活动支持计划(结合和不结合物理治疗咨询)对乳腺癌和前列腺癌幸存者体育活动水平的成本效益:PABLO 试验的设计。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):1073. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4927-z.
6
The Effects of Personalizing Colorectal Cancer Risk Communication on Risk Perceptions and Health Behavior Intentions: a Randomized Trial of Average-Risk Adults.个性化结直肠癌风险沟通对风险认知和健康行为意向的影响:一项针对一般风险成年人的随机试验。
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Aug;36(4):719-727. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01694-5.
7
Internet guidance in oncology practice: determinants of health professionals' Internet referral behavior.互联网在肿瘤学实践中的指导作用:影响健康专业人员互联网转诊行为的因素。
Psychooncology. 2013 Jan;22(1):74-82. doi: 10.1002/pon.2056. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
8
The readability of online breast cancer risk assessment tools.在线乳腺癌风险评估工具的可读性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Nov;154(1):191-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3601-2.
9
Mediators of a physical activity intervention among women with a family history of breast cancer.有乳腺癌家族史女性身体活动干预的调节因素
Women Health. 2018 Jul;58(6):699-713. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2017.1333075. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
10
Mediators of an Internet-based psychosocial intervention for women with breast cancer.针对乳腺癌女性的基于互联网的心理社会干预的调节因素。
Health Psychol. 2015 May;34(5):477-85. doi: 10.1037/hea0000170. Epub 2014 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Tailoring for Health Literacy in the Design and Development of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Review.电子健康干预措施设计与开发中的健康素养定制:系统评价
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Sep 2;12:e76172. doi: 10.2196/76172.
2
Testing Explanations for Skepticism of Personalized Risk Information.测试对个人风险信息持怀疑态度的原因。
Med Decis Making. 2023 May;43(4):430-444. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231162824. Epub 2023 Apr 2.
3
Adherence of Internet-Based Cancer Risk Assessment Tools to Best Practices in Risk Communication: Content Analysis.基于互联网的癌症风险评估工具对风险沟通最佳实践的遵从性:内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 25;23(1):e23318.
4
Risk Ladder, Table, or Bulleted List? Identifying Formats That Effectively Communicate Personalized Risk and Risk Reduction Information for Multiple Diseases.风险阶梯表、表格或项目符号列表?确定有效传达多种疾病个性化风险和风险降低信息的格式。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Jan;41(1):74-88. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20968070. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
5
Commentary: 20 years online with "Your Disease Risk".评论:“你的疾病风险”在线 20 年。
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Jan;32(1):5-11. doi: 10.1007/s10552-020-01356-3. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
6
Translating Cancer Risk Prediction Models into Personalized Cancer Risk Assessment Tools: Stumbling Blocks and Strategies for Success.将癌症风险预测模型转化为个性化癌症风险评估工具:成功的绊脚石和策略。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Dec;29(12):2389-2394. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0861. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
7
Participatory Design of a Personalized Genetic Risk Tool to Promote Behavioral Health.用于促进行为健康的个性化遗传风险工具的参与式设计。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Jul;13(7):583-592. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0029. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
8
Alcohol and breast cancer risk: Middle-aged women's logic and recommendations for reducing consumption in Australia.酒精与乳腺癌风险:澳大利亚中年女性的逻辑与减少饮酒量的建议。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 13;14(2):e0211293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211293. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Personalized Multi-Condition Risk Assessment in Primary Care.一项初级保健中个性化多病症风险评估的整群随机试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jan;52(1):100-105. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
2
The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis.态度、规范和自我效能的改变对健康相关意图和行为的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Health Psychol. 2016 Nov;35(11):1178-1188. doi: 10.1037/hea0000387. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
3
Association of Leisure-Time Physical Activity With Risk of 26 Types of Cancer in 1.44 Million Adults.144万成年人的休闲时间体力活动与26种癌症风险的关联
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jun 1;176(6):816-25. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1548.
4
Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence.监测目标进展是否能促进目标达成?实验证据的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2016 Feb;142(2):198-229. doi: 10.1037/bul0000025. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
5
My Lived Experiences Are More Important Than Your Probabilities: The Role of Individualized Risk Estimates for Decision Making about Participation in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR).我的亲身经历比你的概率更重要:个性化风险评估在关于参与他莫昔芬和雷洛昔芬(STAR)研究决策中的作用。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Nov;35(8):1010-22. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15594382. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
6
Taking Stock of Unrealistic Optimism.审视不切实际的乐观主义。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul;8(4):395-411. doi: 10.1177/1745691613485247.
7
Contemplating genetic feedback regarding lung cancer susceptibility.考虑关于肺癌易感性的基因反馈。
Ann Behav Med. 2014 Jun;47(3):395-403. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9561-z.
8
The value of personalised risk information: a qualitative study of the perceptions of patients with prostate cancer.个体化风险信息的价值:一项对前列腺癌患者认知的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 Sep 13;3(9):e003226. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003226.
9
The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: does method really matter?统计中介分析中间接效应推断检验的相对可信度:方法真的重要吗?
Psychol Sci. 2013 Oct;24(10):1918-27. doi: 10.1177/0956797613480187. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
10
Does heightening risk appraisals change people's intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies.提高风险评估是否会改变人们的意图和行为?实验研究的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Mar;140(2):511-43. doi: 10.1037/a0033065. Epub 2013 Jun 3.

使用基于互联网的乳腺癌风险评估工具改善身体活动的社会认知先兆因素。

Using an Internet-Based Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool to Improve Social-Cognitive Precursors of Physical Activity.

作者信息

Fowler Stephanie L, Klein William M P, Ball Linda, McGuire Jaclyn, Colditz Graham A, Waters Erika A

机构信息

National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (SLF, WMPK).

Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO (LB, JM, GAC, EAW).

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2017 Aug;37(6):657-669. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17699835. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X17699835
PMID:28363033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5498243/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Internet-based cancer risk assessment tools might serve as a strategy for translating epidemiological risk prediction research into public health practice. Understanding how such tools affect key social-cognitive precursors of behavior change is crucial for leveraging their potential into effective interventions.

PURPOSE

To test the effects of a publicly available, Internet-based, breast cancer risk assessment tool on social-cognitive precursors of physical activity.

METHODS

Women (N = 132) aged 40-78 with no personal cancer history indicated their perceived risk of breast cancer and were randomly assigned to receive personalized ( www.yourdiseaserisk.wustl.edu ) or nonpersonalized breast cancer risk information. Immediately thereafter, breast cancer risk perceptions and physical activity-related behavioral intentions, self-efficacy, and response efficacy were assessed.

RESULTS

Personalized information elicited higher intentions, self-efficacy, and response efficacy than nonpersonalized information, P values < 0.05. Self-efficacy and response efficacy mediated the effect of personalizing information on intentions. Women who received personalized information corrected their inaccurate risk perceptions to some extent, P values < 0.05, but few fully accepted the information.

CONCLUSION

Internet-based risk assessment tools can produce beneficial effects on important social-cognitive precursors of behavior change, but lingering skepticism, possibly due to defensive processing, needs to be addressed before the effects can be maximized.

摘要

背景

基于互联网的癌症风险评估工具可能是将流行病学风险预测研究转化为公共卫生实践的一种策略。了解此类工具如何影响行为改变的关键社会认知先兆对于将其潜力转化为有效干预措施至关重要。

目的

测试一种公开可用的基于互联网的乳腺癌风险评估工具对身体活动的社会认知先兆的影响。

方法

132名年龄在40 - 78岁且无个人癌症病史的女性表明了她们感知到的乳腺癌风险,并被随机分配接受个性化(www.yourdiseaserisk.wustl.edu)或非个性化的乳腺癌风险信息。此后立即评估乳腺癌风险认知以及与身体活动相关的行为意图、自我效能感和反应效能感。

结果

个性化信息比非个性化信息引发了更高的意图、自我效能感和反应效能感,P值<0.05。自我效能感和反应效能感介导了信息个性化对意图的影响。收到个性化信息的女性在一定程度上纠正了她们不准确的风险认知,P值<0.05,但很少有人完全接受该信息。

结论

基于互联网的风险评估工具可以对行为改变的重要社会认知先兆产生有益影响,但在效果最大化之前,可能由于防御性加工导致的持续怀疑态度需要得到解决。