Ankuda Claire K, Mitchell Susan L, Gozalo Pedro, Mor Vince, Meltzer David, Teno Joan M
Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Hebrew Senior Life, Institute for Aging Research, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Aug;65(8):1784-1788. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14888. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
Hospitalists hospice referral patterns have been unstudied. This study aims to examine hospice referral rates by attending type for hospitalized nursing home (NH) residents with advanced cognitive impairment (ACI) at the time of discharge between 2000 and 2010.
Retrospective cohort study.
Hospitalized NH residents age ≥66 drawn from the 20% sample of Medicare beneficiaries with ACI, 4 or more activities of daily living (ADL) impairments on last minimum data set (MDS) assessment completed within 120 days of admission (n = 128,989).
Hospice referral was defined as referral to hospice within 1 day after hospital discharge. Attending physician type was determined by Part B physician billing for 100% of the billings during that admission. Continuity of care was defined as the hospital physician also billing for an outpatient visit within 120 days of that hospital admission. Number of ADL impairments, cognitive measures, pre-admission illnesses and illness severity were derived from the MDS.
Of the 105,329 hospitalized patients with ACI that survived to discharge (72.3% white, 30.6% male), the hospice referral rate at the time of hospital discharge increased from 2.8% in 2000 to 11.2% in 2010. Using a multivariate, hospital fixed effects model examining changes in the distribution of inpatient attending physicians, hospitalists compared to generalist physicians were more likely to refer these patients to hospice at discharge (AOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.09-1.26). Continuity of physician care from the outpatient setting to the hospital was associated with lower hospice referral (AOR 0.78, 95% CI 0.73-0.85).
Hospice referrals for NH-dwelling persons with ACI admitted to the hospital increased between 2000 and 2011 and disproportionately so when the attending physician was a hospitalist.
医院医生的临终关怀转诊模式尚未得到研究。本研究旨在调查2000年至2010年期间,患有晚期认知障碍(ACI)的住院疗养院(NH)居民出院时,按主治医生类型划分的临终关怀转诊率。
回顾性队列研究。
从20%的患有ACI的医疗保险受益人样本中抽取年龄≥66岁的住院NH居民,在入院后120天内完成的最后一份最低数据集(MDS)评估中有4项或更多日常生活活动(ADL)受损(n = 128,989)。
临终关怀转诊定义为出院后1天内转诊至临终关怀机构。主治医生类型由B部分医生在该次住院期间100%的账单计费情况确定。连续护理定义为医院医生在该次住院后120天内也为门诊就诊计费。ADL受损数量、认知指标、入院前疾病和疾病严重程度均来自MDS。
在105,329名存活至出院的患有ACI的住院患者中(72.3%为白人,30.6%为男性),出院时的临终关怀转诊率从2000年的2.8%增至2010年的11.2%。使用多变量医院固定效应模型检查住院主治医生分布的变化,与全科医生相比,医院医生在出院时更有可能将这些患者转诊至临终关怀机构(比值比1.17,95%置信区间1.09 - 1.26)。从门诊到医院的医生连续护理与较低的临终关怀转诊相关(比值比0.78,95%置信区间0.73 - 0.85)。
2000年至2011年期间,入住医院的患有ACI的NH居民的临终关怀转诊有所增加,当主治医生为医院医生时,这种增加尤其明显。