Miller Caroline L, Ettridge Kerry A, Wakefield Melanie A
SAHMRI Population Health Research Group, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
School of Population Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Tob Control. 2015 Apr;24(Suppl 2):ii58-ii65. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052049. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
To explore experiences of cigar and cigarillo smokers under Australian laws requiring plain packaging (PP) and strengthened graphic health warnings (GHWs).
In February/March 2014, we conducted: in-depth interviews with 10 regular premium cigar smokers; two focus groups with occasional premium cigar and premium cigarillo smokers (n=14); four focus groups with non-premium cigarillo smokers (n=28); and a national online survey of cigar and/or cigarillo smokers (n=268).
Premium cigar smokers had limited exposure to PP, with many purchasing fully branded cigars in boxes duty free or online and singles in non-compliant packaging. Those who were exposed noticed and were concerned by the warnings, tried to avoid them and felt more like 'dirty smokers'. Changes in perceived taste, harm and value were minimal for experienced premium cigar smokers. Occasional premium cigar and premium cigarillo smokers with higher PP exposure (gained by purchasing boxes rather than singles) perceived cigar/package appeal and value had declined and noticed the GHWs. Non-premium cigarillo smokers reported high PP exposure, reduced perceived appeal, quality, taste, enjoyment and value, somewhat increased perceived harm, greater noticeability of GHWs and concealment of packs and more contemplation of quitting. Online survey participants reported increased noticeability of GHWs (33%), decreased appeal of packaging (53%) and reduced consumption of cigars (42%) and cigarillos (44%) since PP implementation.
Non-premium cigarillo smokers appear to have been most exposed and influenced by PP, with cigar smokers less so, especially regular premium cigar smokers who have maintained access to fully branded products.
探讨在澳大利亚法律要求实行平装包装(PP)和强化图形健康警示(GHW)的情况下,雪茄和小雪茄吸烟者的体验。
2014年2月/3月,我们开展了以下工作:对10名经常吸食高档雪茄的吸烟者进行深入访谈;与偶尔吸食高档雪茄和小雪茄的吸烟者进行了两个焦点小组访谈(n = 14);与非高档小雪茄吸烟者进行了四个焦点小组访谈(n = 28);以及对雪茄和/或小雪茄吸烟者进行全国性在线调查(n = 268)。
高档雪茄吸烟者接触平装包装的机会有限,许多人购买盒装全品牌雪茄免税或通过网络购买,购买单支雪茄则是不符合规定包装的。那些接触到平装包装的人注意到了警示并对此感到担忧,试图避开它们,感觉自己更像“脏吸烟者”。对于有经验的高档雪茄吸烟者来说,在口感、危害和价值认知方面的变化微乎其微。偶尔吸食高档雪茄和小雪茄且接触平装包装程度较高(通过购买盒装而非单支获得)的吸烟者认为雪茄/包装的吸引力和价值有所下降,并注意到了图形健康警示。非高档小雪茄吸烟者报告称接触平装包装的程度较高,感知吸引力、质量、口感、享受程度和价值有所降低,感知危害略有增加,图形健康警示的关注度更高,会对烟包进行遮盖,并且更多地考虑戒烟。在线调查参与者报告称,自实行平装包装以来,图形健康警示的关注度有所提高(33%),包装吸引力下降(53%),雪茄消费量减少(42%),小雪茄消费量减少(44%)。
非高档小雪茄吸烟者似乎受平装包装的影响最大,雪茄吸烟者受影响较小,尤其是那些仍能获得全品牌产品的经常吸食高档雪茄的吸烟者。