White Lauren K, Sequeira Stefanie, Britton Jennifer C, Brotman Melissa A, Gold Andrea L, Berman Erin, Towbin Kenneth, Abend Rany, Fox Nathan A, Bar-Haim Yair, Leibenluft Ellen, Pine Daniel S
From NIMH, Bethesda, Md.; Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia; the Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Fla.; the Child Development Laboratory, University of Maryland, College Park; and the Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv.
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 1;174(8):775-784. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16070847. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
In the treatment of anxiety disorders, attention bias modification therapy (ABMT) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) may have complementary effects by targeting different aspects of perturbed threat responses and behaviors. ABMT may target rapid, implicit threat reactions, whereas CBT may target slowly deployed threat responses. The authors used amygdala-based connectivity during a threat-attention task and a randomized controlled trial design to evaluate potential complementary features of these treatments in pediatric anxiety disorders.
Prior to treatment, youths (8-17 years old) with anxiety disorders (N=54), as well as healthy comparison youths (N=51), performed a threat-attention task during functional MRI acquisition. Task-related amygdala-based functional connectivity was assessed. Patients with and without imaging data (N=85) were then randomly assigned to receive CBT paired with either active or placebo ABMT. Clinical response was evaluated, and pretreatment amygdala-based connectivity profiles were compared among patients with varying levels of clinical response.
Compared with the CBT plus placebo ABMT group, the CBT plus active ABMT group exhibited less severe anxiety after treatment. The patient and healthy comparison groups differed in amygdala-insula connectivity during the threat-attention task. Patients whose connectivity profiles were most different from those of the healthy comparison group exhibited the poorest response to treatment, particularly those who received CBT plus placebo ABMT.
The study provides evidence of enhanced clinical effects for patients receiving active ABMT. Moreover, ABMT appears to be most effective for patients with abnormal amygdala-insula connectivity. ABMT may target specific threat processes associated with dysfunctional amygdala-insula connectivity that are not targeted by CBT alone. This may explain the observation of enhanced clinical response to CBT plus active ABMT.
在焦虑症治疗中,注意力偏差修正疗法(ABMT)和认知行为疗法(CBT)可能通过针对受干扰的威胁反应和行为的不同方面而产生互补作用。ABMT可能针对快速、隐性的威胁反应,而CBT可能针对缓慢形成的威胁反应。作者在一项威胁注意力任务和随机对照试验设计中,利用基于杏仁核的连接性来评估这些治疗方法在儿童焦虑症中的潜在互补特征。
治疗前,患有焦虑症的青少年(8 - 17岁,N = 54)以及健康对照青少年(N = 51)在功能磁共振成像采集期间进行一项威胁注意力任务。评估与任务相关的基于杏仁核的功能连接性。然后将有和没有成像数据的患者(N = 85)随机分配接受CBT并搭配主动或安慰剂ABMT。评估临床反应,并比较不同临床反应水平患者的治疗前基于杏仁核的连接性特征。
与CBT加安慰剂ABMT组相比,CBT加主动ABMT组治疗后焦虑症状减轻。在威胁注意力任务期间,患者组和健康对照组在杏仁核 - 脑岛连接性方面存在差异。连接性特征与健康对照组差异最大的患者对治疗反应最差,尤其是那些接受CBT加安慰剂ABMT治疗的患者。
该研究为接受主动ABMT治疗的患者临床效果增强提供了证据。此外,ABMT似乎对杏仁核 - 脑岛连接异常的患者最有效。ABMT可能针对与功能失调的杏仁核 - 脑岛连接相关的特定威胁过程,而这是单独的CBT所不能针对的。这可能解释了观察到的CBT加主动ABMT临床反应增强的现象。