Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Schizophr Res. 2018 Feb;192:281-286. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.04.031. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
Impairments in cognitive insight-the capacity to appraise and modify one's own distorted beliefs-are believed to be associated with the formation of psychosis. Nevertheless, the association between cognitive insight and cognitive function among people with at-risk mental state (ARMS) for developing psychotic illness has not been made clear. In this study, we used the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS) to assess cognitive insight and the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) to assess cognitive functions. Fifty subjects with ARMS and 29 healthy volunteers were recruited as participants. The scores for the two groups on the BCIS, BACS, and WCST were compared and Spearman's rank correlations between the domains of the BCIS and cognitive performance were examined in each group. No significant differences were found in BCIS scores between these groups, whereas all of the cognitive function scores were poorer in the participants with ARMS. In the ARMS group, higher self-certainty on the BCIS was significantly correlated with lower performance in the mean number of categories achieved (ρ=-0.31, P=0.03) and perseverative errors of the Nelson type (ρ=0.29, P=0.04) on the WCST. This indicates that excessively high self-certainty might be linked with weaknesses in cognitive flexibility or set-shifting ability in people with ARMS.
认知洞察力的损害——即评估和修正自身扭曲信念的能力——被认为与精神病的形成有关。然而,处于精神病发病风险状态(ARMS)的人群的认知洞察力与认知功能之间的关联尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们使用贝克认知洞察力量表(BCIS)评估认知洞察力,并用简明精神分裂症认知评估量表(BACS)和威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)评估认知功能。招募了 50 名 ARMS 患者和 29 名健康志愿者作为参与者。比较了两组在 BCIS、BACS 和 WCST 上的得分,并在每组中检查了 BCIS 各领域与认知表现之间的斯皮尔曼等级相关。这两组在 BCIS 评分上没有发现显著差异,而 ARMS 组的所有认知功能评分都较差。在 ARMS 组中,BCIS 上的自我确信程度越高,在 WCST 上达到的平均类目数(ρ=-0.31,P=0.03)和纳尔逊型持续错误(ρ=0.29,P=0.04)的表现越差。这表明,过度的自我确信可能与 ARMS 人群的认知灵活性或定势转移能力较弱有关。