• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者在接受微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后获得了与年轻患者相当的临床和影像学结果。

Elderly Patients Achieving Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Comparable with Those of Younger Patients Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

作者信息

Nikhil N Joshi, Lim Joel Wei-An, Yeo William, Yue Wai-Mun

机构信息

Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedics, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Asian Spine J. 2017 Apr;11(2):230-242. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.2.230. Epub 2017 Apr 12.

DOI:10.4184/asj.2017.11.2.230
PMID:28443167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5401837/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of prospective database.

PURPOSE

To compare 2-year clinical and radiological outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) among "middle-age" (50-64.99 years), "young-old" (65-74.99 years), and "old-old" (>75 years) patients.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Owing to higher perioperative morbidity and mortality rates, elderly patients with degenerative lumbar conditions are occasionally denied surgical care, even after conservative treatment failure. MIS-TLIF advantages include reduced blood loss, reduced analgesia requirements, early mobilization, and shorter hospital stays.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2012, 22 patients (age >75 years) treated with 1-2 level MIS-TLIF were matched with "young-old" and "middle-age" patients (22 each) based on race, body mass index (BMI), diagnosis, spinal level, number of spinal levels operated upon, and bone graft type. Clinical outcomes included the Oswestry disability index (ODI), neurogenic symptom score (NSS), 36-item short form health survey (SF-36), and visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain. Radiological assessment included plain radiographs and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and plain radiographs at 1, 3, 6, and 24 months postoperatively. Fusion grade, loosening, cage migration, and adjacent segment degeneration were assessed.

RESULTS

The groups had similar fluoroscopy time, operation duration, and postoperative analgesia type used. "Old-old" patients took longer to ambulate (1.6 days) and had longer hospital stays (6 days). All patients showed significant improvement in clinical outcome scores at all time-points compared with the preoperative status. "Middle-age" patients showed better ODI and SF-36 physical function scores than "old-old" patients preoperatively and 2 years post surgery. NSS, VAS (back and leg), and SF-36 mental function scores were similar between groups preoperatively and at every time-point postoperatively. Minimal clinical important differences (63.6%-95.5% at 2 years) were achieved. Grade 1 fusion occurred in a minimum of 80% patients in each group 2 years post surgery. Complication rates were similar. Adjacent segment disease occurred in 2 patients from the "young-old" group, with no significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MIS-TLIF showed comparable results in selected "old-old" patients compared with "young-old" and "middle-age" patients without increased complication risks.

摘要

研究设计

对前瞻性数据库进行回顾性分析。

目的

比较“中年”(50 - 64.99岁)、“年轻老年”(65 - 74.99岁)和“老年老年”(>75岁)患者接受微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS - TLIF)后2年的临床和影像学结果。

文献综述

由于围手术期发病率和死亡率较高,即使保守治疗失败,患有退行性腰椎疾病的老年患者有时也会被拒绝手术治疗。MIS - TLIF的优点包括减少失血、减少镇痛需求、早期活动和缩短住院时间。

方法

在2007年至2012年期间接受1 - 2节段MIS - TLIF治疗的22例患者(年龄>75岁),根据种族、体重指数(BMI)、诊断、脊柱节段、手术的脊柱节段数量和骨移植类型,与“年轻老年”和“中年”患者(各22例)进行匹配。临床结果包括奥斯威斯功能障碍指数(ODI)、神经源性症状评分(NSS)、36项简短健康调查问卷(SF - 36)以及背部和腿部疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)。影像学评估包括术前平片和磁共振成像(MRI)以及术后1、3、6和24个月的平片。评估融合分级、松动、椎间融合器移位和相邻节段退变情况。

结果

各组的透视时间、手术时长和术后使用的镇痛类型相似。“老年老年”患者下床活动时间较长(1.6天),住院时间较长(6天)。与术前状态相比,所有患者在所有时间点的临床结果评分均有显著改善。术前及术后2年,“中年”患者的ODI和SF - 36身体功能评分优于“老年老年”患者。术前及术后各时间点,各组间的NSS、VAS(背部和腿部)和SF - 36心理功能评分相似。在2年时达到了最小临床重要差异(63.6% - 95.5%)。术后2年,每组至少80%的患者实现了1级融合。并发症发生率相似。“年轻老年”组有2例患者发生相邻节段疾病,各组间无显著差异。

结论

与“年轻老年”和“中年”患者相比,MIS - TLIF在选定的“老年老年”患者中显示出可比的结果,且并发症风险未增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a1f/5401837/988c6c15242f/asj-11-230-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a1f/5401837/083f0cbd2fc1/asj-11-230-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a1f/5401837/f1ef12efa227/asj-11-230-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a1f/5401837/cbebca1d0023/asj-11-230-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a1f/5401837/09e571a712ec/asj-11-230-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a1f/5401837/c92c0011717b/asj-11-230-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a1f/5401837/be5c7d8d5044/asj-11-230-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a1f/5401837/1015e2f76122/asj-11-230-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a1f/5401837/988c6c15242f/asj-11-230-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a1f/5401837/083f0cbd2fc1/asj-11-230-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a1f/5401837/f1ef12efa227/asj-11-230-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a1f/5401837/cbebca1d0023/asj-11-230-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a1f/5401837/09e571a712ec/asj-11-230-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a1f/5401837/c92c0011717b/asj-11-230-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a1f/5401837/be5c7d8d5044/asj-11-230-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a1f/5401837/1015e2f76122/asj-11-230-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a1f/5401837/988c6c15242f/asj-11-230-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Elderly Patients Achieving Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Comparable with Those of Younger Patients Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.老年患者在接受微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后获得了与年轻患者相当的临床和影像学结果。
Asian Spine J. 2017 Apr;11(2):230-242. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.2.230. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
2
Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.开放式与微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的临床和影像学结果。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Nov;21(11):2265-70. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2281-4. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
3
Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Provides Sustained Improvements in Clinical and Radiological Outcomes up to 5 Years Postoperatively in Patients with Neurogenic Symptoms Secondary to Spondylolisthesis.对于因腰椎滑脱继发神经症状的患者,单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术在术后长达5年的时间里能持续改善临床和影像学结果。
Asian Spine J. 2017 Apr;11(2):204-212. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.2.204. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
4
[Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].[单节段腰椎退变性疾病的微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术短期疗效比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Mar;27(3):262-7.
5
Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的 5 年疗效比较:配对比较研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Nov 1;38(23):2049-55. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8212d.
6
A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?肥胖患者腰椎手术的前瞻性、多机构比较有效性研究:微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术是否能带来更好的疗效?
World Neurosurg. 2015 May;83(5):860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.034. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
7
[Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].[象限通道下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ度退行性腰椎滑脱症]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Mar 25;32(3):199-206. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.03.002.
8
Intraoperative reduction does not result in better outcomes in low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with neurogenic symptoms after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-a 5-year follow-up study.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后,术中复位对于伴有神经症状的低度腰椎滑脱症并未带来更好的疗效——一项5年随访研究
Spine J. 2016 Feb;16(2):182-90. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.10.026. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
9
Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与后路腰椎椎间融合术疗效的时间进程观察
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2019 Jun 15;59(6):222-230. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2018-0194. Epub 2019 May 9.
10
Associated lumbar scoliosis does not affect outcomes in patients undergoing focal minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MISTLIF) for neurogenic symptoms-a minimum 2-year follow-up study.合并腰椎侧弯不影响因神经源性症状接受局部微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MISTLIF)患者的手术效果——一项至少2年的随访研究。
Spine J. 2017 Jan;17(1):34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.05.022. Epub 2016 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Long term clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for lumbar spondylolisthesis in a geriatric (>65 years) population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年(>65岁)人群腰椎滑脱症的微创经椎间孔椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)的长期临床疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Surg. 2025 Mar 21;12:1517947. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1517947. eCollection 2025.
2
Long-Term Results of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Elderly Patients: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study.老年患者微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的长期疗效:一项5年随访研究
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):838-845. doi: 10.1177/21925682231214067. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的 5 年疗效比较:配对比较研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Nov 1;38(23):2049-55. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8212d.
2
Epidural steroid injections are associated with less improvement in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a subgroup analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial.硬膜外类固醇注射与腰椎椎管狭窄症患者的改善程度较低相关:脊柱患者结局研究试验的亚组分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Feb 15;38(4):279-91. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827ec51f.
3
Is Advanced Age a Factor That Influences the Clinical Outcome of Single- or Double-Level MIS-TLIF? A Single-Center Study with a Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up on 103 Consecutive Cases.
高龄是影响单节段或双节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术临床结果的因素吗?一项对103例连续病例进行至少两年随访的单中心研究。
Life (Basel). 2023 Jun 16;13(6):1401. doi: 10.3390/life13061401.
4
Posterior stabilization with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with titanium rods for single-level lumbar spine degenerative disease in patients above 70 years of age.70 岁以上患者单节段腰椎退变性疾病后路采用聚醚醚酮(PEEK)棒固定和经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(TLIF)联合钛棒固定。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jun;143(6):2831-2843. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04448-8. Epub 2022 May 5.
5
Understanding the Future Prospects of Synergizing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery with Ceramics and Regenerative Cellular Therapies.理解微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与陶瓷和再生细胞疗法协同作用的未来前景。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 31;22(7):3638. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073638.
6
Spinal Surgery in Patients Aged 80 Years and Older: Risk Stratification Using the Modified Frailty Index.80岁及以上患者的脊柱手术:使用改良虚弱指数进行风险分层
Global Spine J. 2021 May;11(4):525-532. doi: 10.1177/2192568220914877. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
7
Are the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal/Posterior Lumbar Fusion Influenced by the Patient's Age or BMI?微创经椎间孔/后路腰椎融合术的疗效是否受患者年龄或 BMI 的影响?
Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;33(7):284-291. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001019.
8
Elderly Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion May Have Similar Clinical Outcomes, Perioperative Complications, and Fusion Rates As Their Younger Counterparts.接受微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的老年患者与年轻患者相比,可能具有相似的临床结果、围手术期并发症和融合率。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Apr;478(4):822-832. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001054.
9
Surgical Risk Assessment and Prevention in Elderly Spinal Deformity Patients.老年脊柱畸形患者的手术风险评估与预防
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019 May 22;10:2151459319851681. doi: 10.1177/2151459319851681. eCollection 2019.
10
Incidence and risk factors of posterior cage migration following decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar disorders.退行性腰椎疾病减压及器械融合术后后路椎间融合器移位的发生率及危险因素
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Aug;96(33):e7804. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007804.
Instrumented Minimally Invasive Spinal-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF): Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up With Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes.
器械辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF):至少5年的临床和影像学结果随访
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Jul;31(6):E302-E309. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827415cd.
4
Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.开放式与微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的临床和影像学结果。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Nov;21(11):2265-70. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2281-4. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
5
Perioperative and postoperative complications of single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly adults.老年人单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的围手术期和术后并发症。
J Clin Neurosci. 2012 Jan;19(1):111-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
6
Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症后评估疼痛、残疾和健康状况的最小临床重要差异的效用。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 May;14(5):598-604. doi: 10.3171/2010.12.SPINE10472. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
7
Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion in patients older than 70 years of age: analysis of peri- and postoperative complications.70 岁以上患者的微创腰椎体间融合术:围手术期并发症分析。
Neurosurgery. 2011 Apr;68(4):897-902; discussion 902. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182098bfa.
8
Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: minimum 3 years of follow-up.经皮椎弓根螺钉固定腰椎体间融合治疗成人低度峡部裂性脊椎滑脱症:至少 3 年随访结果。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Dec;67(6):1600-7; discussion 1607-8. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181f91697.
9
Defining "complications" in spine surgery: neurosurgery and orthopedic spine surgeons' survey.脊柱手术中“并发症”的定义:神经外科与骨科脊柱外科医生的调查
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Dec;23(8):493-500. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181c11f89.
10
Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的临床及影像学结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jun 1;34(13):1385-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a4e3be.