Nikhil N Joshi, Lim Joel Wei-An, Yeo William, Yue Wai-Mun
Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedics, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Asian Spine J. 2017 Apr;11(2):230-242. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.2.230. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
Retrospective analysis of prospective database.
To compare 2-year clinical and radiological outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) among "middle-age" (50-64.99 years), "young-old" (65-74.99 years), and "old-old" (>75 years) patients.
Owing to higher perioperative morbidity and mortality rates, elderly patients with degenerative lumbar conditions are occasionally denied surgical care, even after conservative treatment failure. MIS-TLIF advantages include reduced blood loss, reduced analgesia requirements, early mobilization, and shorter hospital stays.
Between 2007 and 2012, 22 patients (age >75 years) treated with 1-2 level MIS-TLIF were matched with "young-old" and "middle-age" patients (22 each) based on race, body mass index (BMI), diagnosis, spinal level, number of spinal levels operated upon, and bone graft type. Clinical outcomes included the Oswestry disability index (ODI), neurogenic symptom score (NSS), 36-item short form health survey (SF-36), and visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain. Radiological assessment included plain radiographs and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and plain radiographs at 1, 3, 6, and 24 months postoperatively. Fusion grade, loosening, cage migration, and adjacent segment degeneration were assessed.
The groups had similar fluoroscopy time, operation duration, and postoperative analgesia type used. "Old-old" patients took longer to ambulate (1.6 days) and had longer hospital stays (6 days). All patients showed significant improvement in clinical outcome scores at all time-points compared with the preoperative status. "Middle-age" patients showed better ODI and SF-36 physical function scores than "old-old" patients preoperatively and 2 years post surgery. NSS, VAS (back and leg), and SF-36 mental function scores were similar between groups preoperatively and at every time-point postoperatively. Minimal clinical important differences (63.6%-95.5% at 2 years) were achieved. Grade 1 fusion occurred in a minimum of 80% patients in each group 2 years post surgery. Complication rates were similar. Adjacent segment disease occurred in 2 patients from the "young-old" group, with no significant differences between groups.
MIS-TLIF showed comparable results in selected "old-old" patients compared with "young-old" and "middle-age" patients without increased complication risks.
对前瞻性数据库进行回顾性分析。
比较“中年”(50 - 64.99岁)、“年轻老年”(65 - 74.99岁)和“老年老年”(>75岁)患者接受微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS - TLIF)后2年的临床和影像学结果。
由于围手术期发病率和死亡率较高,即使保守治疗失败,患有退行性腰椎疾病的老年患者有时也会被拒绝手术治疗。MIS - TLIF的优点包括减少失血、减少镇痛需求、早期活动和缩短住院时间。
在2007年至2012年期间接受1 - 2节段MIS - TLIF治疗的22例患者(年龄>75岁),根据种族、体重指数(BMI)、诊断、脊柱节段、手术的脊柱节段数量和骨移植类型,与“年轻老年”和“中年”患者(各22例)进行匹配。临床结果包括奥斯威斯功能障碍指数(ODI)、神经源性症状评分(NSS)、36项简短健康调查问卷(SF - 36)以及背部和腿部疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)。影像学评估包括术前平片和磁共振成像(MRI)以及术后1、3、6和24个月的平片。评估融合分级、松动、椎间融合器移位和相邻节段退变情况。
各组的透视时间、手术时长和术后使用的镇痛类型相似。“老年老年”患者下床活动时间较长(1.6天),住院时间较长(6天)。与术前状态相比,所有患者在所有时间点的临床结果评分均有显著改善。术前及术后2年,“中年”患者的ODI和SF - 36身体功能评分优于“老年老年”患者。术前及术后各时间点,各组间的NSS、VAS(背部和腿部)和SF - 36心理功能评分相似。在2年时达到了最小临床重要差异(63.6% - 95.5%)。术后2年,每组至少80%的患者实现了1级融合。并发症发生率相似。“年轻老年”组有2例患者发生相邻节段疾病,各组间无显著差异。
与“年轻老年”和“中年”患者相比,MIS - TLIF在选定的“老年老年”患者中显示出可比的结果,且并发症风险未增加。