• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于因腰椎滑脱继发神经症状的患者,单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术在术后长达5年的时间里能持续改善临床和影像学结果。

Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Provides Sustained Improvements in Clinical and Radiological Outcomes up to 5 Years Postoperatively in Patients with Neurogenic Symptoms Secondary to Spondylolisthesis.

作者信息

Bin Abd Razak Hamid Rahmatullah, Dhoke Priyesh, Tay Kae-Sian, Yeo William, Yue Wai-Mun

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

Shanta Spine Institute, Nagpur, India.

出版信息

Asian Spine J. 2017 Apr;11(2):204-212. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.2.204. Epub 2017 Apr 12.

DOI:10.4184/asj.2017.11.2.204
PMID:28443164
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5401834/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospective registry data.

PURPOSE

To determine 5-year clinical and radiological outcomes of single-level instrumented minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in patients with neurogenic symptoms secondary to spondylolisthesis.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

MIS-TLIF and open approaches have been shown to yield comparable outcomes. This is the first study to assess MIS-TLIF outcomes using the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) criterion.

METHODS

The outcomes of 56 patients treated by a single surgeon, including the Oswestry disability index (ODI), neurogenic symptom score, short-form 36 questionnaire (SF-36), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back pain (BP), and leg pain (LP), were collected prospectively for up to 5 years postoperatively. Radiological outcomes included adjacent segment degeneration, fusion, cage subsidence, and screw loosening rates.

RESULTS

Our patients were predominantly female (71.4%) and had a mean age of 53.7±11.3 years and mean body mass index of 25.7±3.7 kg/m. The mean operative time, blood loss, time to ambulation, and hospitalization were 167±49 minutes, 126±107 mL, 1.2±0.4 days, and 2.8±1.1 days, respectively. The mean fluoroscopic time was 58.4±33 seconds, and the mean postoperative intravenous morphine dose was 8±2 mg. Regarding outcomes, postoperative scores improved relative to preoperative scores, and this was sustained across various time points for up to 5 years (<0.001). Improvements in ODI, SF-36, VAS-BP, and VAS-LP all met the MCID criterion. Notably, 5.4% of our patients developed clinically significant adjacent segment disease during follow-up, and 7 minor complications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-level instrumented MIS-TLIF is suitable for patients with neurogenic symptoms secondary to lumbar spondylolisthesis and is associated with an acceptable complication rate. Both clinical and radiological outcomes were sustained up to 5 years postoperatively, with many patients achieving an MCID.

摘要

研究设计

对前瞻性登记数据进行回顾性分析。

目的

确定因腰椎滑脱继发神经症状的患者接受单节段器械辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)后的5年临床和影像学结果。

文献综述

MIS-TLIF和开放手术方法已显示出可比的结果。这是第一项使用最小临床重要差异(MCID)标准评估MIS-TLIF结果的研究。

方法

前瞻性收集由单一外科医生治疗的56例患者的结果,包括Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、神经症状评分、简短36项问卷(SF-36)以及背痛(BP)和腿痛(LP)的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,随访时间长达术后5年。影像学结果包括相邻节段退变、融合、椎间融合器下沉和螺钉松动率。

结果

我们的患者以女性为主(71.4%),平均年龄为53.7±11.3岁,平均体重指数为25.7±3.7kg/m。平均手术时间、失血量、下床活动时间和住院时间分别为167±49分钟、126±107mL、1.2±0.4天和2.8±1.1天。平均透视时间为58.4±33秒,术后平均静脉注射吗啡剂量为8±2mg。关于结果,术后评分相对于术前评分有所改善,并且在长达5年的不同时间点均保持这一趋势(<0.001)。ODI、SF-36、VAS-BP和VAS-LP的改善均符合MCID标准。值得注意的是,我们的患者中有5.4%在随访期间出现了具有临床意义的相邻节段疾病,报告了7例轻微并发症。

结论

单节段器械辅助MIS-TLIF适用于因腰椎滑脱继发神经症状的患者,且并发症发生率可接受。临床和影像学结果在术后长达5年时均保持良好,许多患者达到了MCID。

相似文献

1
Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Provides Sustained Improvements in Clinical and Radiological Outcomes up to 5 Years Postoperatively in Patients with Neurogenic Symptoms Secondary to Spondylolisthesis.对于因腰椎滑脱继发神经症状的患者,单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术在术后长达5年的时间里能持续改善临床和影像学结果。
Asian Spine J. 2017 Apr;11(2):204-212. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.2.204. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
2
Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.评估可活动扩张式椎间融合器在微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症中的影像学和临床结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562.
3
Intraoperative reduction does not result in better outcomes in low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with neurogenic symptoms after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-a 5-year follow-up study.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后,术中复位对于伴有神经症状的低度腰椎滑脱症并未带来更好的疗效——一项5年随访研究
Spine J. 2016 Feb;16(2):182-90. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.10.026. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
4
A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与单纯减压治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症的对比研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E13. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18722.
5
A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?肥胖患者腰椎手术的前瞻性、多机构比较有效性研究:微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术是否能带来更好的疗效?
World Neurosurg. 2015 May;83(5):860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.034. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
6
Elderly Patients Achieving Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Comparable with Those of Younger Patients Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.老年患者在接受微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后获得了与年轻患者相当的临床和影像学结果。
Asian Spine J. 2017 Apr;11(2):230-242. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.2.230. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
7
Revisions for screw malposition and clinical outcomes after robot-guided lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.腰椎滑脱症机器人辅助下腰椎融合术后螺钉位置不当的修正及临床疗效
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 May;42(5):E12. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS16534.
8
Radiological adjacent-segment degeneration in L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison between dynamic stabilization and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.L4-5椎体滑脱症中的放射学相邻节段退变:动态稳定与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的比较
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Sep;29(3):250-258. doi: 10.3171/2018.1.SPINE17993. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
9
[Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].[象限通道下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ度退行性腰椎滑脱症]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Mar 25;32(3):199-206. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.03.002.
10
Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症后评估疼痛、残疾和健康状况的最小临床重要差异的效用。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 May;14(5):598-604. doi: 10.3171/2010.12.SPINE10472. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Unilateral biportal endoscopic versus microscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in China: study protocol for a prospective, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.单侧双通道内镜与显微镜下经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗中国退变性腰椎管狭窄症的前瞻性随机对照非劣效临床试验方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 25;14(9):e083786. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083786.
2
Short-term and mid-term evaluation of three types of minimally invasive lumbar fusion surgery for treatment of L4/L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis.三种微创腰椎融合术治疗 L4/L5 退变性腰椎滑脱的短期和中期评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 21;14(1):4320. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54970-5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Results of 23 consecutive cases.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:23例连续病例的结果
Indian J Orthop. 2014 Nov;48(6):562-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.144217.
2
A comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review and meta-analysis.腰椎后路椎间融合术与经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的比较:文献综述与荟萃分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Nov 5;15:367. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-367.
3
Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF®): how I do it.
Marker Screw Utilization for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MS-MIS TLIF): Promises and Advantages.
标记螺钉在微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(MS-MIS TLIF)中的应用:前景与优势。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 16;59(3):585. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030585.
4
Unilateral pedicle screw fixation of lumber spine: A safe internal fixation method.腰椎单侧椎弓根螺钉固定:一种安全的内固定方法。
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 21;8(11):e11621. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11621. eCollection 2022 Nov.
5
OLIF versus MI-TLIF for patients with degenerative lumbar disease: Is one procedure superior to the other? A systematic review and meta-analysis.退行性腰椎疾病患者的斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)与改良经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MI-TLIF):一种手术方法是否优于另一种?一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 13;9:1014314. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1014314. eCollection 2022.
6
Bone-Mounted Robotic System in Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery for Osteoporosis Patients: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes.骨固定机器人系统在骨质疏松症患者微创脊柱手术中的应用:临床和影像学结果。
Clin Interv Aging. 2022 Apr 22;17:589-599. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S359538. eCollection 2022.
7
Long-Term Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: 10-Year Follow-up Results.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的长期临床和影像学结果:10 年随访结果。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Apr 4;37(13):e105. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e105.
8
Clinical outcomes, complications and fusion rates in endoscopic assisted intraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (iLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF): systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜辅助椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(iLIF)与微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(MI-TLIF)治疗腰椎疾病的临床疗效、并发症和融合率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 8;12(1):2101. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05988-0.
9
Comparison of Perioperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive and Open TLIF in Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta‑Analysis.肥胖患者微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术围手术期及术后结果比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Pain Res. 2022 Jan 6;15:41-52. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S329162. eCollection 2022.
10
Fusion rate and influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review.融合率与手术相关因素对退行性脊柱疾病腰椎体间融合术的影响:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2020 Apr;104(1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s12306-019-00634-x. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
极外侧椎间融合术(XLIF®):我的手术方法。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015 Mar;157(3):547-51. doi: 10.1007/s00701-014-2248-9. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
4
Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion rates performed without posterolateral fusion.对不进行后外侧融合的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Oct;21(10):1686-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
5
Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的 5 年疗效比较:配对比较研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Nov 1;38(23):2049-55. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8212d.
6
Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions.腰椎不同治疗干预后的邻近节段疾病。
Spine J. 2013 Oct;13(10):1339-49. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.020. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
7
Instrumented Minimally Invasive Spinal-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF): Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up With Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes.器械辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF):至少5年的临床和影像学结果随访
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Jul;31(6):E302-E309. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827415cd.
8
Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.开放式与微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的临床和影像学结果。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Nov;21(11):2265-70. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2281-4. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
9
The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的手术技术
J Neurosurg Sci. 2011 Sep;55(3):259-64.
10
Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症后评估疼痛、残疾和健康状况的最小临床重要差异的效用。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 May;14(5):598-604. doi: 10.3171/2010.12.SPINE10472. Epub 2011 Feb 18.