• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鲁迪研究:利用数字技术促成研究合作关系。

The RUDY study: using digital technologies to enable a research partnership.

作者信息

Teare Harriet J A, Hogg Joanna, Kaye Jane, Luqmani Raashid, Rush Elaine, Turner Alison, Watts Laura, Williams Melanie, Javaid M Kassim

机构信息

HeLEX Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Jun;25(7):816-822. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.57. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1038/ejhg.2017.57
PMID:28443622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5520069/
Abstract

Patients have extensive experience of their disease that can enhance the design and execution of research leading to significant innovations and efficiencies in the research process. The research community on the whole have been slow to adopt practices that enable patients to become active partners in research. Digital technologies are providing the means to do this more easily and so are increasingly being used to interact with patients and involve them in the design and execution of research. The RUDY (Rare UK Diseases of bone, joints and blood vessels) study's pioneering approach applies a custom-developed electronic platform where patients can contribute information over time about their disease experience, lifestyle and clinical history. This is combined with a state-of-the-art Dynamic Consent model and a commitment to patient-driven research, to further our understanding of rare diseases. This paper describes the RUDY study and the benefits that have been gained from adopting this partnership approach to research.

摘要

患者对自身疾病有着丰富的经验,这能够提升研究的设计与实施水平,从而在研究过程中带来重大创新并提高效率。总体而言,研究界在采用能使患者成为研究中积极伙伴的做法方面进展缓慢。数字技术正提供了更便捷地做到这一点的手段,因此越来越多地被用于与患者互动,并让他们参与研究的设计与实施。鲁迪(英国骨骼、关节和血管罕见病)研究的开创性方法应用了一个定制开发的电子平台,患者可以随着时间推移提供有关其疾病经历、生活方式和临床病史的信息。这与最先进的动态同意模型以及对患者驱动研究的承诺相结合,以增进我们对罕见病的了解。本文描述了鲁迪研究以及采用这种合作式研究方法所获得的益处。

相似文献

1
The RUDY study: using digital technologies to enable a research partnership.鲁迪研究:利用数字技术促成研究合作关系。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Jun;25(7):816-822. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.57. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
2
The practice of active patient involvement in rare disease research using ICT: experiences and lessons from the RUDY JAPAN project.利用信息通信技术让患者积极参与罕见病研究的实践:来自“鲁迪日本”项目的经验与教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Feb 1;7(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00253-6.
3
The RUDY study platform - a novel approach to patient driven research in rare musculoskeletal diseases.鲁迪研究平台——一种针对罕见肌肉骨骼疾病开展患者驱动型研究的新方法。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 Nov 8;11(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0528-6.
4
Physical therapists and importance of work participation in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a focus group study.物理治疗师以及肌肉骨骼疾病患者工作参与的重要性:一项焦点小组研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 May 16;18(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1546-9.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Patient partner engagement in the publication process: challenges and possible solutions.患者伴侣参与出版过程:挑战与可能的解决方案。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Feb 15;25(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02495-4.
7
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
8
The effects of integrating work-related factors and improving cooperation in musculoskeletal physical therapy practice: protocol for the 'WORK TO BE DONE' cluster randomised controlled trial.将工作相关因素整合并改善肌肉骨骼物理治疗实践中的合作效果:“待完成的工作”集群随机对照试验方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jun 8;21(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03375-2.
9
[PartnerREC network: Result from a process of coconstruction with patient partners and researchers].[合作伙伴研究伦理委员会网络:与患者合作伙伴和研究人员共同构建过程的结果]
Rev Med Suisse. 2024 Oct 9;20(890):1825-1829. doi: 10.53738/REVMED.2024.20.890.1825.
10
A new paradigm for musculoskeletal clinical trials in the UK: the Arthritis Research Campaign (ARC) Clinical Studies Groups initiative.英国肌肉骨骼临床试验的新范式:关节炎研究运动(ARC)临床研究小组倡议。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008 Jun;47(6):777-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken097. Epub 2008 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Public Preferences for Digital Health Data Sharing: Discrete Choice Experiment Study in 12 European Countries.公众对数字健康数据共享的偏好:12 个欧洲国家的离散选择实验研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 23;25:e47066. doi: 10.2196/47066.
2
Evaluation of CTRL: a web application for dynamic consent and engagement with individuals involved in a cardiovascular genetic disorders cohort.评估 CTRL:一个用于心血管遗传疾病队列中个体的动态同意和参与的网络应用程序。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jan;32(1):61-68. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01454-1. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
3
A GDPR-Compliant Dynamic Consent Mobile Application for the Australasian Type-1 Diabetes Data Network.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards 'Engagement 2.0': Insights from a study of dynamic consent with biobank participants.迈向“参与2.0”:一项关于生物样本库参与者动态同意的研究见解
Digit Health. 2015 Sep 28;1:2055207615605644. doi: 10.1177/2055207615605644. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.
2
Health-related quality of life and a cost-utility simulation of adults in the UK with osteogenesis imperfecta, X-linked hypophosphatemia and fibrous dysplasia.英国成骨不全症、X连锁低磷血症和骨纤维发育不良患者的健康相关生活质量及成本效用模拟
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 Nov 28;11(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0538-4.
3
The Cooperative Health Research in South Tyrol (CHRIS) study: rationale, objectives, and preliminary results.
一款符合通用数据保护条例(GDPR)的动态同意移动应用程序,用于澳大拉西亚1型糖尿病数据网络。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 8;11(4):496. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11040496.
4
Co-creation with research participants to inform the design of electronic informed consent.与研究参与者共同创造,为电子知情同意书的设计提供信息。
Digit Health. 2022 Jun 26;8:20552076221109068. doi: 10.1177/20552076221109068. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
5
Framework and Practical Guidance for the Ethical Use of Electronic Methods for Communication With Participants in Medical Research.电子通讯在医学研究中使用的伦理框架和实用指南
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 20;24(4):e33167. doi: 10.2196/33167.
6
Simulating the Genetics Clinic of the Future - whether undergoing whole-genome sequencing shapes professional attitudes.模拟未来的遗传学诊所——接受全基因组测序是否会塑造专业态度。
J Community Genet. 2022 Apr;13(2):247-256. doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00561-0. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
7
Preferences for Updates on General Research Results: A Survey of Participants in Genomic Research from Two Institutions.对一般研究结果更新的偏好:来自两个机构的基因组研究参与者调查
J Pers Med. 2021 May 11;11(5):399. doi: 10.3390/jpm11050399.
8
The PICASO cloud platform for improved holistic care in rheumatoid arthritis treatment-experiences of patients and clinicians.PICASO 云平台改善类风湿关节炎治疗中的整体护理:患者和临床医生的体验。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 May 27;23(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02526-7.
9
What can data trusts for health research learn from participatory governance in biobanks?健康研究的数据信托可以从生物库的参与式治理中学到什么?
J Med Ethics. 2022 May;48(5):323-328. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107020. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
10
Adding dynamic consent to a longitudinal cohort study: A qualitative study of EXCEED participant perspectives.将动态同意纳入纵向队列研究:关于EXCEED参与者观点的定性研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Feb 9;22(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00583-w.
南蒂罗尔合作健康研究(CHRIS):原理、目标及初步结果
J Transl Med. 2015 Nov 5;13:348. doi: 10.1186/s12967-015-0704-9.
4
Rethinking the relationship between science and society: Has there been a shift in attitudes to Patient and Public Involvement and Public Engagement in Science in the United Kingdom?重新思考科学与社会的关系:英国对患者及公众参与科学以及公众参与科学的态度是否发生了转变?
Health Expect. 2016 Jun;19(3):592-601. doi: 10.1111/hex.12295. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
5
Re-contacting participants for inclusion in the database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP): Findings from three case-control studies of lung cancer.重新联系参与者以纳入基因型和表型数据库(dbGaP):三项肺癌病例对照研究的结果。
Genome Med. 2014 Jul 23;6(7):54. doi: 10.1186/s13073-014-0054-x. eCollection 2014.
6
Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks.动态同意:21世纪研究网络的患者界面
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Feb;23(2):141-6. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.71. Epub 2014 May 7.
7
Patient-initiated research in rheumatic diseases in Sweden--dignity, identity and quality of life in focus when patients set the research agenda.瑞典风湿性疾病患者发起的研究——当患者设定研究议程时,尊严、身份认同和生活质量成为关注焦点。
Musculoskeletal Care. 2014 Sep;12(3):194-7. doi: 10.1002/msc.1073. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
8
Finding people who will tell you their thoughts on genomics-recruitment strategies for social sciences research.寻找愿意告诉你他们对社会科学研究中基因组学招募策略看法的人。
J Community Genet. 2014 Oct;5(4):291-302. doi: 10.1007/s12687-014-0184-2. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
9
From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research.从患者到合作伙伴:生物医学研究中的以参与者为中心的举措。
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Apr 3;13(5):371-6. doi: 10.1038/nrg3218.
10
Algorithm discovery by protein folding game players.通过蛋白质折叠游戏玩家发现算法。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 22;108(47):18949-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115898108. Epub 2011 Nov 7.