Suppr超能文献

感知到的创造机会量表的构建与验证

Construction and Validation of the Perceived Opportunity to Craft Scale.

作者信息

van Wingerden Jessica, Niks Irene M W

机构信息

Centre of Knowledge and Innovation, Schouten GlobalZaltbommel, Netherlands.

Department of Work and Organizational Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 12;8:573. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00573. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

We developed and validated a scale to measure employees' perceived opportunity to craft (POC) in two separate studies conducted in the Netherlands (total = 2329). POC is defined as employees' perception of their opportunity to craft their job. In Study 1, the perceived opportunity to craft scale (POCS) was developed and tested for its factor structure and reliability in an explorative way. Study 2 consisted of confirmatory analyses of the factor structure and reliability of the scale as well as examination of the discriminant and criterion-related validity of the POCS. The results indicated that the scale consists of one dimension and could be reliably measured with five items. Evidence was found for the discriminant validity of the POCS. The scale also showed criterion-related validity when correlated with job crafting (+), job resources (autonomy +; opportunities for professional development +), work engagement (+), and the inactive construct cynicism (-). We discuss the implications of these findings for theory and practice.

摘要

我们在荷兰进行的两项独立研究(共2329人)中开发并验证了一个量表,用于衡量员工感知到的工作塑造机会(POC)。POC被定义为员工对其塑造自身工作机会的感知。在研究1中,以探索性方式开发了感知工作塑造机会量表(POCS),并对其因子结构和信度进行了测试。研究2包括对该量表的因子结构和信度进行验证性分析,以及对POCS的区分效度和效标关联效度进行检验。结果表明,该量表由一个维度组成,可以用五个项目进行可靠测量。发现了POCS具有区分效度的证据。当该量表与工作塑造(正相关)、工作资源(自主性正相关;职业发展机会正相关)、工作投入(正相关)以及消极构念犬儒主义(负相关)相关时,也显示出效标关联效度。我们讨论了这些发现对理论和实践的意义。

相似文献

1
Construction and Validation of the Perceived Opportunity to Craft Scale.
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 12;8:573. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00573. eCollection 2017.
3
Employees' Perceived Opportunities to Craft and In-Role Performance: The Mediating Role of Job Crafting and Work Engagement.
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 25;8:1876. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01876. eCollection 2017.
4
Validation of the Japanese version of the job crafting scale.
J Occup Health. 2016 Jun 16;58(3):231-40. doi: 10.1539/joh.15-0173-OA. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
5
The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2013 Apr;18(2):230-40. doi: 10.1037/a0032141. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
6
The development and validation of a job crafting measure for use with blue-collar workers.
Work Stress. 2012 Oct;26(4):365-384. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2012.733543. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
7
I believe I can craft! introducing Job Crafting Self-Efficacy Scale (JCSES).
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 10;15(8):e0237250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237250. eCollection 2020.
8
The Spanish version of the Job Crafting Scale.
Psicothema. 2018 Feb;30(1):136-142. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.293.
9
Job crafting, work engagement, and psychological distress among Japanese employees: a cross-sectional study.
Biopsychosoc Med. 2017 Feb 10;11:6. doi: 10.1186/s13030-017-0091-y. eCollection 2017.
10
Validation of a Short Form of Job Crafting Scale in a Spanish Sample.
Span J Psychol. 2018 Nov 19;21:E51. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2018.52.

引用本文的文献

1
Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction, Job Crafting, and Meaningful Work: Network Analysis.
Trends Psychol. 2022 Jul 7:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s43076-022-00203-5.
3
When high work engagement is negative for family tasks: mechanisms and boundary conditions.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 27;15:1403701. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1403701. eCollection 2024.
4
The Holistic Life-Crafting Model: a systematic literature review of meaning-making behaviors.
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 23;14:1271188. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1271188. eCollection 2023.
5
Evaluating employability in contexts of change: validation of a scale.
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 1;14:1150008. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1150008. eCollection 2023.
6
Assessing Teaching Compassion, Work Engagement and Compassion Fatigue Among Teachers During the Pandemic.
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Sep 13;15:2561-2571. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S383292. eCollection 2022.
7
Individual Workplace Well-Being Captured into a Literature- and Stakeholders-Based Causal Loop Diagram.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;19(15):8925. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19158925.
8
Measuring sustainable employability: psychometric properties of the capability set for work questionnaire.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 14;22(1):1184. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13609-8.
9
Occupational Stress and Catholic Priests: A Scoping Review of the Literature.
J Relig Health. 2021 Dec;60(6):3807-3870. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01352-0. Epub 2021 Aug 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
2
Burnout and engagement at work as a function of demands and control.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001 Aug;27(4):279-86. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.615.
3
Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures?
J Appl Psychol. 1997 Apr;82(2):247-52. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.247.
4
5
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验