• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Construction and Validation of the Perceived Opportunity to Craft Scale.感知到的创造机会量表的构建与验证
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 12;8:573. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00573. eCollection 2017.
2
Perceived Opportunities to Craft Scale: adaptation and evidence of the construct validity of the Brazilian version.感知到的构建量表的机会:巴西版本的适应性及结构效度证据
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2020 Sep 7;33(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s41155-020-00158-5.
3
Employees' Perceived Opportunities to Craft and In-Role Performance: The Mediating Role of Job Crafting and Work Engagement.员工感知到的塑造机会与角色内绩效:工作塑造与工作投入的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 25;8:1876. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01876. eCollection 2017.
4
Validation of the Japanese version of the job crafting scale.日本版工作重塑量表的验证
J Occup Health. 2016 Jun 16;58(3):231-40. doi: 10.1539/joh.15-0173-OA. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
5
The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being.工作重塑对工作要求、工作资源和幸福感的影响。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2013 Apr;18(2):230-40. doi: 10.1037/a0032141. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
6
The development and validation of a job crafting measure for use with blue-collar workers.一种适用于蓝领工人的工作重塑测量方法的开发与验证。
Work Stress. 2012 Oct;26(4):365-384. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2012.733543. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
7
I believe I can craft! introducing Job Crafting Self-Efficacy Scale (JCSES).我相信我可以进行工作重塑!介绍工作重塑自我效能感量表(JCSES)。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 10;15(8):e0237250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237250. eCollection 2020.
8
The Spanish version of the Job Crafting Scale.工作重塑量表的西班牙语版本。
Psicothema. 2018 Feb;30(1):136-142. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.293.
9
Job crafting, work engagement, and psychological distress among Japanese employees: a cross-sectional study.日本员工的工作重塑、工作投入与心理困扰:一项横断面研究。
Biopsychosoc Med. 2017 Feb 10;11:6. doi: 10.1186/s13030-017-0091-y. eCollection 2017.
10
Validation of a Short Form of Job Crafting Scale in a Spanish Sample.西班牙样本中工作重塑量表简版的验证
Span J Psychol. 2018 Nov 19;21:E51. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2018.52.

引用本文的文献

1
Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction, Job Crafting, and Meaningful Work: Network Analysis.基本心理需求满足、工作重塑与有意义的工作:网络分析
Trends Psychol. 2022 Jul 7:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s43076-022-00203-5.
2
Start Task Crafting, Stay Away from Cyberloafing: The Moderating Role of Supervisor Developmental Feedback.开启任务构思,远离网络怠工:上级发展性反馈的调节作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Oct 17;14(10):960. doi: 10.3390/bs14100960.
3
When high work engagement is negative for family tasks: mechanisms and boundary conditions.当高工作投入对家庭任务产生负面影响时:机制与边界条件
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 27;15:1403701. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1403701. eCollection 2024.
4
The Holistic Life-Crafting Model: a systematic literature review of meaning-making behaviors.整体生活塑造模型:意义建构行为的系统文献综述
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 23;14:1271188. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1271188. eCollection 2023.
5
Evaluating employability in contexts of change: validation of a scale.在变革背景下评估就业能力:一种量表的验证
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 1;14:1150008. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1150008. eCollection 2023.
6
Assessing Teaching Compassion, Work Engagement and Compassion Fatigue Among Teachers During the Pandemic.评估疫情期间教师的教学同情心、工作投入度和同情疲劳状况。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Sep 13;15:2561-2571. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S383292. eCollection 2022.
7
Individual Workplace Well-Being Captured into a Literature- and Stakeholders-Based Causal Loop Diagram.个体工作场所幸福感纳入基于文献和利益相关者的因果关系循环图。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;19(15):8925. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19158925.
8
Measuring sustainable employability: psychometric properties of the capability set for work questionnaire.衡量可持续就业能力:工作能力套件问卷的心理测量特性。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 14;22(1):1184. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13609-8.
9
Occupational Stress and Catholic Priests: A Scoping Review of the Literature.职业压力与天主教神父:文献综述
J Relig Health. 2021 Dec;60(6):3807-3870. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01352-0. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
10
Perceived Opportunities to Craft Scale: adaptation and evidence of the construct validity of the Brazilian version.感知到的构建量表的机会:巴西版本的适应性及结构效度证据
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2020 Sep 7;33(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s41155-020-00158-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
2
Burnout and engagement at work as a function of demands and control.工作倦怠与投入作为需求和控制的函数。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001 Aug;27(4):279-86. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.615.
3
Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures?总体工作满意度:单项测量指标的效果如何?
J Appl Psychol. 1997 Apr;82(2):247-52. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.247.
4
Determination and quantification of content validity.内容效度的确定与量化。
Nurs Res. 1986 Nov-Dec;35(6):382-5.
5
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.结构模型中的比较拟合指数。
Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.

感知到的创造机会量表的构建与验证

Construction and Validation of the Perceived Opportunity to Craft Scale.

作者信息

van Wingerden Jessica, Niks Irene M W

机构信息

Centre of Knowledge and Innovation, Schouten GlobalZaltbommel, Netherlands.

Department of Work and Organizational Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 12;8:573. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00573. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00573
PMID:28446893
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5388759/
Abstract

We developed and validated a scale to measure employees' perceived opportunity to craft (POC) in two separate studies conducted in the Netherlands (total = 2329). POC is defined as employees' perception of their opportunity to craft their job. In Study 1, the perceived opportunity to craft scale (POCS) was developed and tested for its factor structure and reliability in an explorative way. Study 2 consisted of confirmatory analyses of the factor structure and reliability of the scale as well as examination of the discriminant and criterion-related validity of the POCS. The results indicated that the scale consists of one dimension and could be reliably measured with five items. Evidence was found for the discriminant validity of the POCS. The scale also showed criterion-related validity when correlated with job crafting (+), job resources (autonomy +; opportunities for professional development +), work engagement (+), and the inactive construct cynicism (-). We discuss the implications of these findings for theory and practice.

摘要

我们在荷兰进行的两项独立研究(共2329人)中开发并验证了一个量表,用于衡量员工感知到的工作塑造机会(POC)。POC被定义为员工对其塑造自身工作机会的感知。在研究1中,以探索性方式开发了感知工作塑造机会量表(POCS),并对其因子结构和信度进行了测试。研究2包括对该量表的因子结构和信度进行验证性分析,以及对POCS的区分效度和效标关联效度进行检验。结果表明,该量表由一个维度组成,可以用五个项目进行可靠测量。发现了POCS具有区分效度的证据。当该量表与工作塑造(正相关)、工作资源(自主性正相关;职业发展机会正相关)、工作投入(正相关)以及消极构念犬儒主义(负相关)相关时,也显示出效标关联效度。我们讨论了这些发现对理论和实践的意义。