• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本一家医院中用于注射用抗癌药物的配药机器人APOTECAchemo的性能评估

Performance evaluation of the compounding robot, APOTECAchemo, for injectable anticancer drugs in a Japanese hospital.

作者信息

Iwamoto Takuya, Morikawa Takuya, Hioki Miki, Sudo Hirofumi, Paolucci Demis, Okuda Masahiro

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie 514-8507 Japan.

Loccioni Humancare, Moie di Maiolati, Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2017 Apr 24;3:12. doi: 10.1186/s40780-017-0081-z. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1186/s40780-017-0081-z
PMID:28451441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5402647/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The accuracy, safety and feasibility of, the compounding robot APOTECAchemo were evaluated in the clinical practice of Japan.

METHODS

Accuracy and precision of robotic preparations by APOTECAchemo was evaluated in 20 preparations of fluorouracil (FU) and cyclophosphamide (CPA) infusions by four pharmacists. Environmental and product contaminations with FU and CPA were evaluated by wipe testing. Robotic performance was compared with manual preparation in a biological safety cabinet. The number of robotic products, total compounding time and total pre-reconstitution time of lyophilized drugs between January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015 were investigated.

RESULTS

Robotic preparation resulted more accurate and precise (mean absolute dose error and coefficient of variation were 0.83 and 1.04% for FU and 0.52 and 0.59% for CPA) than those of manual preparation (respective values were 1.20 and 1.46% for FU and 1.70 and 2.20% for CPA). Drug residue was not detected from any of the prepared infusion bags with the robotic preparation, whereas FU was detected in two of four analyzed infusion bags with manual preparation. Average total time to make single anticancer drug preparation (compounding plus reconstitution of lyophilized drugs) was 6.11 min in the second half of 2015. During the study period, the highest percentage of production covered by APOTECAchemo was 70.4% of the total inpatient pharmacy activity.

CONCLUSION

Robotic preparation using APOTECAchemo should give substantial advantages in drug compounding for accuracy and safety and was able to be successfully worked in Mie university hospital.

摘要

背景

在日本的临床实践中评估了复方机器人APOTECAchemo的准确性、安全性和可行性。

方法

由四名药剂师对APOTECAchemo进行的机器人制剂的准确性和精密度在20次氟尿嘧啶(FU)和环磷酰胺(CPA)输注制剂中进行了评估。通过擦拭测试评估了FU和CPA对环境和产品的污染情况。在生物安全柜中,将机器人操作性能与手工制剂进行了比较。调查了2014年1月1日至2015年12月31日期间机器人产品的数量、冻干药物的总配制时间和总复溶前时间。

结果

机器人制剂比手工制剂更准确、精密(FU的平均绝对剂量误差和变异系数分别为0.83和1.04%,CPA分别为0.52和0.59%),手工制剂相应的值FU为1.20和1.46%,CPA为1.70和2.20%。机器人制剂的任何制备输液袋中均未检测到药物残留,而手工制剂的四个分析输液袋中有两个检测到FU。2015年下半年,制备单一抗癌药物制剂(配制加冻干药物复溶)的平均总时间为6.11分钟。在研究期间,APOTECAchemo覆盖的最高生产百分比为住院药房总活动的70.4%。

结论

使用APOTECAchemo进行机器人制剂在药物配制的准确性和安全性方面应具有显著优势,并且能够在三重大学医院成功运行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b431/5402647/e999b16a5b12/40780_2017_81_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b431/5402647/eb0ef2c5348e/40780_2017_81_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b431/5402647/fe8e6dd4d054/40780_2017_81_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b431/5402647/3ba59491c796/40780_2017_81_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b431/5402647/9989277760f9/40780_2017_81_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b431/5402647/e999b16a5b12/40780_2017_81_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b431/5402647/eb0ef2c5348e/40780_2017_81_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b431/5402647/fe8e6dd4d054/40780_2017_81_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b431/5402647/3ba59491c796/40780_2017_81_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b431/5402647/9989277760f9/40780_2017_81_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b431/5402647/e999b16a5b12/40780_2017_81_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance evaluation of the compounding robot, APOTECAchemo, for injectable anticancer drugs in a Japanese hospital.日本一家医院中用于注射用抗癌药物的配药机器人APOTECAchemo的性能评估
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2017 Apr 24;3:12. doi: 10.1186/s40780-017-0081-z. eCollection 2017.
2
Environmental contamination by cyclophosphamide preparation: Comparison of conventional manual production in biological safety cabinet and robot-assisted production by APOTECAchemo.环磷酰胺制剂的环境污染:生物安全柜中传统手工生产与APOTECAchemo机器人辅助生产的比较。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2016 Feb;22(1):37-45. doi: 10.1177/1078155214551316. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
3
The assessment of environmental and external cross-contamination in preparing ready-to-administer cytotoxic drugs: a comparison between a robotic system and conventional manual production.制备即用型细胞毒性药物过程中环境和外部交叉污染的评估:机器人系统与传统手工生产的比较
Int J Pharm Pract. 2020 Feb;28(1):66-74. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12575. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
4
Robotic compounding versus manual compounding of chemotherapy: Comparing dosing accuracy and precision.化疗药物的机器人配制与手工配制:剂量准确性和精密度的比较。
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2020 Dec 1;155:105536. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105536. Epub 2020 Aug 30.
5
Evaluation of external contamination on the vial surfaces of some hazardous drugs that commonly used in Chinese hospitals and comparison between environmental contamination generated during robotic compounding by IV: Dispensing robot vs. manual compounding in biological safety cabinet.评估中国医院常用的一些危害药物的小瓶表面的外源性污染,并比较机器人药物混合与在生物安全柜中手动混合时产生的环境污染:IV 分配机器人与手动混合。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2022 Oct;28(7):1487-1498. doi: 10.1177/10781552211023571. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
6
Implementation and microbiological stability of dose-banded ganciclovir infusion bags prepared in series by a robotic system.通过机器人系统串联制备剂量分段更昔洛韦输液袋的实施和微生物稳定性。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Jul;27(4):209-215. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001745. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
7
Evaluation of Robotic Systems on Cytotoxic Drug Preparation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人系统在细胞毒性药物制备中的评估:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Feb 22;59(3):431. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030431.
8
Efficacy of four cleaning solutions for the decontamination of selected cytotoxic drugs on the different surfaces of an automated compounding system.四种清洁溶液对自动配药系统不同表面上选定细胞毒性药物的去污效果。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2019 Jan;16(1):6-15. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2018.1526384. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
9
Microbiological performance of a robotic system for aseptic compounding of cytostatic drugs.机器人系统无菌配制细胞毒性药物的微生物性能。
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2019 Mar 15;130:181-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2019.01.034. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
10
Aggregate Formation and Antibody Stability in Infusion Bags: The Impact of Manual and Robotic Compounding of Monoclonal Antibodies.输液袋中的聚集形成和抗体稳定性:手动和机器人配制单克隆抗体的影响。
J Pharm Sci. 2024 Apr;113(4):1029-1037. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2023.10.015. Epub 2023 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic evaluation of a robotic chemotherapy compounding system and its service expansion to network hospital in Thailand.泰国机器人化疗配药系统的经济评估及其向网络医院的服务扩展
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):1002. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13186-7.
2
Advancing healthcare through mobile collaboration: a survey of intelligent nursing robots research.通过移动协作推进医疗保健:智能护理机器人研究调查
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 26;12:1368805. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1368805. eCollection 2024.
3
Implementation and Evaluation of APOTECAchemo in a Community Cancer Center: A Comparative Study of Robotic Versus Manual Antineoplastic Preparation.

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacists' roles in oncology pharmacy services: Results of a global survey.药剂师在肿瘤药学服务中的角色:一项全球调查结果
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2017 Apr;23(3):185-194. doi: 10.1177/1078155216629827. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
2
NIOSH Safe Handling of Hazardous Drugs Guidelines Becomes State Law.美国国家职业安全与健康研究所《危险药物安全操作指南》成为州法律。
J Infus Nurs. 2015 Nov-Dec;38 Suppl 6:S25-8. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000141.
3
From a reactive to a proactive safety approach. Analysis of medication errors in chemotherapy using general failure types.
APOTECAchemo在社区癌症中心的实施与评估:机器人与手工抗肿瘤药物制备的比较研究
J Pharm Technol. 2024 Dec;40(6):269-276. doi: 10.1177/87551225241278203. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
4
Computer programs used in the field of hospital pharmacy for the management of dangerous drugs: systematic review of literature.医院药学领域用于管理危险药物的计算机程序:文献系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 30;11:1233264. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1233264. eCollection 2023.
5
Intravenous compounding robots in pharmacy intravenous admixture services: A systematic review.药学静脉药物配置服务中的静脉配置机器人:系统评价。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 May 12;102(19):e33476. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033476.
6
Evaluation of Robotic Systems on Cytotoxic Drug Preparation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人系统在细胞毒性药物制备中的评估:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Feb 22;59(3):431. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030431.
7
Analysis of production time and capacity for manual and robotic compounding scenarios for parenteral hazardous drugs.分析手动和机器人混合配置用于肠外危险药物的生产时间和产能。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2024 Jun 21;31(4):352-357. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003576.
8
Automated preparation of cytotoxic drugs: the evidence for an interface between the robot and computerized provider order entry?细胞毒性药物的自动化配制:机器人与计算机化医嘱录入系统之间接口的证据?
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2023 Mar;30(2):e12. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003234. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
9
Process performance of a new liquid medication dispensing robot.新型液体药物配药机器人的性能。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2023 Nov;30(6):340-346. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-002811. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
10
The impact of pharmacist oriented mode on risk control in a Chinese centralized intravenous admixture service centre.药师主导模式对中国集中化静脉药物配置中心风险控制的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 8;11(1):5445. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85077-w.
从反应式安全方法到主动式安全方法。使用一般故障类型分析化疗中的用药错误。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Jan;26(1). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12348. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
4
ASHP guidelines on preventing medication errors with chemotherapy and biotherapy.美国卫生系统药师协会关于预防化疗和生物治疗用药错误的指南。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Apr 15;72(8):e6-e35. doi: 10.2146/sp150001.
5
Environmental contamination by cyclophosphamide preparation: Comparison of conventional manual production in biological safety cabinet and robot-assisted production by APOTECAchemo.环磷酰胺制剂的环境污染:生物安全柜中传统手工生产与APOTECAchemo机器人辅助生产的比较。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2016 Feb;22(1):37-45. doi: 10.1177/1078155214551316. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
6
Automated preparation of chemotherapy: quality improvement and economic sustainability.化疗的自动化制备:质量改进与经济可持续性
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014 Apr 1;71(7):579-85. doi: 10.2146/ajhp130489.
7
Environmental contamination, product contamination and workers exposure using a robotic system for antineoplastic drug preparation.使用机器人系统进行抗肿瘤药物配制时的环境污染、产品污染及工作人员暴露情况。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2015 Apr;21(2):118-27. doi: 10.1177/1078155214522840. Epub 2014 Feb 23.
8
Implementation of an i.v.-compounding robot in a hospital-based cancer center pharmacy.在一家基于医院的癌症中心药房中实施静脉输液混合机器人。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Nov 15;70(22):2030-7. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120649.
9
Infusional chemotherapy and medication errors in a tertiary care pediatric cancer unit in a resource-limited setting.资源有限环境下三级护理儿科癌症病房中的输注化疗与用药错误
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2014 Oct;36(7):e412-5. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000044.
10
Impact of closed-system drug transfer device on exposure of environment and healthcare provider to cyclophosphamide in Japanese hospital.密闭式药物转移装置对日本医院环境及医护人员接触环磷酰胺的影响。
Springerplus. 2013 Jun 21;2(1):273. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-273. Print 2013 Dec.