Werumeus Buning Annabel, Geersing Tjerk H, Crul Mirjam
Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Pharm Pract. 2020 Feb;28(1):66-74. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12575. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
The primary aim of the study was to compare environmental and external (cross-) contamination of traces of cytostatics, during preparation of 5-fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide using a robotic system (APOTECAchemo) or the conventional manual compounding procedure. The secondary aim was to validate the cleaning procedure of the robot.
Eighty ready-to-administer (RTA) infusion bags with 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide or sodium chloride were compounded using both techniques on 3-5 days. Wipe samples were taken from several locations in the compounding room before and after cleaning, and also from the technician's gloves. These samples were analysed for 5-fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide concentrations using GC/MS/MS.
A total of 284 wipe samples were collected during the study (113 from the manual and 171 from the robotic process). External contamination on the outside of infusion bags was 3.75% for both manual and robotic compounding. For manual compounding, external cross-contamination occurred on 2.5% of the prepared infusion bags. External cross-contamination occurred on 1.25% of the infusion bags for the robotic procedure. Inside the compounding room, 9% of the environmental wipe samples were contaminated in case of manual production and 24% for robotic compounding. Since 50% of the contaminated environmental samples for the robotic system were taken after cleaning, the cleaning procedure was extended and parameter setting for cyclophosphamide handling was performed. After this, residual environmental or external contamination was no longer detectable.
Comparison of both preparation methods showed that external (cross-)contamination of infusion bags was lower using the robotic system. An optimized cleaning procedure showed the best results in environmental contamination for the robot.
本研究的主要目的是比较在使用机器人系统(APOTECAchemo)或传统手工配制程序制备5-氟尿嘧啶和环磷酰胺过程中细胞抑制剂痕迹的环境和外部(交叉)污染情况。次要目的是验证机器人的清洁程序。
在3至5天内,使用这两种技术配制了80袋含5-氟尿嘧啶、环磷酰胺或氯化钠的即用型(RTA)输液袋。在清洁前后,从配制室的几个位置以及技术人员的手套上采集擦拭样本。使用气相色谱/串联质谱法分析这些样本中的5-氟尿嘧啶和环磷酰胺浓度。
研究期间共收集了284个擦拭样本(113个来自手工配制过程,171个来自机器人配制过程)。手工和机器人配制时输液袋外部的污染率均为3.75%。对于手工配制,2.5%的已制备输液袋出现外部交叉污染。机器人配制过程中,1.25%的输液袋出现外部交叉污染。在配制室内,手工生产时9%的环境擦拭样本被污染,机器人配制时为24%。由于机器人系统50%的受污染环境样本是在清洁后采集的,因此延长了清洁程序并对环磷酰胺处理的参数设置进行了调整。在此之后,环境或外部的残留污染不再可检测到。
两种制备方法的比较表明,使用机器人系统时输液袋的外部(交叉)污染较低。优化后的清洁程序在机器人的环境污染方面显示出最佳效果。