Nässi Anu, Ferrauti Alexander, Meyer Tim, Pfeiffer Mark, Kellmann Michael
a Faculty of Sport Science , Ruhr University Bochum , Bochum , Germany.
b Institute of Sports and Preventive Medicine, University of Saarland , Saarbrücken , Germany.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2017 Aug;17(7):894-903. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2017.1318180. Epub 2017 May 2.
The Acute Recovery and Stress Scale (ARSS) and the Short Recovery and Stress Scale were first established in German for the purposes of monitoring athletes' current recovery-stress states in an economical and multidimensional manner. The aim of this paper is to document the development and initial validation of the English versions of these two psychometric monitoring tools. A total of 267 English-speaking athletes from a variety of team and individual sports participated in the study. The English versions demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency for both instruments (Cronbach α of .74-.89). Furthermore, good model fit was found for the eight scales of the ARSS, matching the structure and results of the German counterparts. Correlations among and between the scales reciprocate the theoretical constructs of stress and recovery, supporting the construct validity of the scales. Correlation coefficients within stress and recovery ranged between r = .29 and .68. The correlations between stress and recovery varied between r = -.29 and -.64. These constructs were further supported by correlations with the scores of the Recovery-Stress Questionnaire for Athletes, thereby showing convergent validity. The findings demonstrate initial validity and reliability of the two measures and reflect the results of the German versions. However, further research is needed before applying these scales in practical settings.
急性恢复与压力量表(ARSS)和简短恢复与压力量表最初是在德国制定的,目的是以经济且多维度的方式监测运动员当前的恢复-压力状态。本文旨在记录这两种心理测量监测工具英文版本的开发及初步验证情况。共有267名来自各种团队和个人运动项目、说英语的运动员参与了这项研究。这两个英文版本在两种工具上均显示出令人满意的内部一致性(克朗巴哈α系数为0.74 - 0.89)。此外,ARSS的八个量表显示出良好的模型拟合度,与德语版本的结构和结果相符。量表之间的相关性体现了压力和恢复的理论结构,支持了量表的结构效度。压力和恢复量表内部的相关系数在r = 0.29至0.68之间。压力与恢复之间的相关性在r = -0.29至-0.64之间。这些结构进一步通过与运动员恢复-压力问卷得分的相关性得到支持,从而显示出收敛效度。研究结果证明了这两种测量方法的初步效度和信度,并反映了德语版本的结果。然而,在实际应用这些量表之前,还需要进一步的研究。