• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主要智能手机操作系统(iOS、安卓)的用户在个性方面差异很小。

Users of the main smartphone operating systems (iOS, Android) differ only little in personality.

作者信息

Götz Friedrich M, Stieger Stefan, Reips Ulf-Dietrich

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 May 3;12(5):e0176921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176921. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0176921
PMID:28467473
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5415193/
Abstract

The increasingly widespread use of mobile phone applications (apps) as research tools and cost-effective means of vast data collection raises new methodological challenges. In recent years, it has become a common practice for scientists to design apps that run only on a single operating system, thereby excluding large numbers of users who use a different operating system. However, empirical evidence investigating any selection biases that might result thereof is scarce. Henceforth, we conducted two studies drawing from a large multi-national (Study 1; N = 1,081) and a German-speaking sample (Study 2; N = 2,438). As such Study 1 compared iOS and Android users across an array of key personality traits (i.e., well-being, self-esteem, willingness to take risks, optimism, pessimism, Dark Triad, and the Big Five). Focusing on Big Five personality traits in a broader scope, in addition to smartphone users, Study 2 also examined users of the main computer operating systems (i.e., Mac OS, Windows). In both studies, very few significant differences were found, all of which were of small or even tiny effect size mostly disappearing after sociodemographics had been controlled for. Taken together, minor differences in personality seem to exist, but they are of small to negligible effect size (ranging from OR = 0.919 to 1.344 (Study 1), ηp2 = .005 to .036 (Study 2), respectively) and may reflect differences in sociodemographic composition, rather than operating system of smartphone users.

摘要

将手机应用程序(应用)作为研究工具以及作为收集大量数据的经济有效手段的使用日益广泛,这带来了新的方法学挑战。近年来,科学家设计仅在单一操作系统上运行的应用程序已成为一种常见做法,从而排除了大量使用不同操作系统的用户。然而,调查由此可能产生的任何选择偏差的实证证据却很匮乏。此后,我们进行了两项研究,一项来自大型跨国样本(研究1;N = 1,081),另一项来自说德语的样本(研究2;N = 2,438)。研究1比较了iOS和安卓用户在一系列关键人格特质(即幸福感、自尊、冒险意愿、乐观主义、悲观主义、黑暗三人格以及大五人格)方面的差异。研究2除了关注智能手机用户外,还在更广泛的范围内聚焦大五人格特质,同时考察了主要计算机操作系统(即Mac OS、Windows)的用户。在两项研究中,发现的显著差异非常少,而且所有差异的效应量都很小甚至极小,在控制了社会人口统计学因素后大多消失。总体而言,人格方面似乎存在微小差异,但效应量小到可以忽略不计(研究1中OR值范围为0.919至1.344,研究2中ηp2值范围为0.005至0.036),这可能反映的是社会人口统计学构成的差异,而非智能手机用户的操作系统差异。

相似文献

1
Users of the main smartphone operating systems (iOS, Android) differ only little in personality.主要智能手机操作系统(iOS、安卓)的用户在个性方面差异很小。
PLoS One. 2017 May 3;12(5):e0176921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176921. eCollection 2017.
2
Predicting Smartphone Operating System from Personality and Individual Differences.从人格和个体差异预测智能手机操作系统。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016 Dec;19(12):727-732. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0324. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
3
Diabetes Applications for Arabic Speakers: A Critical Review of Available Apps for Android and iOS Operated Smartphones.面向阿拉伯语使用者的糖尿病应用程序:对安卓和iOS操作系统智能手机可用应用程序的批判性综述。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;225:587-91.
4
Ecological Momentary Assessment based Differences between Android and iOS Users of the TrackYourHearing mHealth Crowdsensing Platform.基于生态瞬时评估的TrackYourHearing移动健康众包传感平台安卓和iOS用户之间的差异
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2019 Jul;2019:3951-3955. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2019.8857854.
5
Profiling Dating Apps Users: Sociodemographic and Personality Characteristics.交友软件用户画像:社会人口学和人格特征。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 22;17(10):3653. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103653.
6
Reliability and validity of a smartphone pulse rate application for the assessment of resting and elevated pulse rate.一款用于评估静息和升高心率的智能手机心率应用程序的可靠性和有效性。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2016 Aug;32(6):494-499. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2016.1203046. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
7
mHealth intervention to improve medication management in chronically ill patients: analysis of the recruitment process.移动健康干预改善慢性病患者药物管理:招募过程分析
Postgrad Med. 2016 May;128(4):427-31. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1170580. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
8
Smartphones and dental trauma: the current availability of apps for managing traumatic dental injuries.智能手机与牙外伤:当前用于管理牙外伤的应用程序情况
Dent Traumatol. 2016 Feb;32(1):52-7. doi: 10.1111/edt.12217. Epub 2015 Sep 20.
9
Smartphone Applications for the Clinical Oncologist in UK Practice.适用于英国临床肿瘤学家的智能手机应用程序
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Jun;30(2):367-73. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0681-3.
10
The use of a smartphone application for fast lung cancer risk assessment†.使用智能手机应用程序进行快速肺癌风险评估†
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Jun 1;51(6):1171-1176. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw444.

引用本文的文献

1
Boosting Physical Activity Among Individuals With Low Engagement Through Double-Point Incentives in a Community-Based mHealth Intervention: Retrospective Observational Study.在基于社区的移动健康干预中通过双点激励提高低参与度个体的身体活动水平:回顾性观察研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Aug 21;13:e66227. doi: 10.2196/66227.
2
Users' Needs for Mental Health Apps: Quality Evaluation Using the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale.用户对心理健康应用程序的需求:使用移动应用程序评分量表用户版进行质量评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Jul 4;13:e64622. doi: 10.2196/64622.
3
A comparison of self-reported COVID-19 symptoms between android and iOS CoronaCheck app users.安卓和iOS系统的CoronaCheck应用程序用户自我报告的新冠病毒症状比较。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Apr 9;8(1):197. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01595-1.
4
Virtual Reality experiments in the field.虚拟现实领域实验
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 8;20(4):e0318688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318688. eCollection 2025.
5
Samply Stream API: The AI-enhanced method for real-time event data streaming.样本流应用程序编程接口:用于实时事件数据流的人工智能增强方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Mar 17;57(4):119. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02634-1.
6
A Comparative Survey on Daily Health Habits Among iPhone and Android Smartphone Users.iPhone和安卓智能手机用户日常健康习惯的比较调查
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024 Jul 27:15598276241268195. doi: 10.1177/15598276241268195.
7
The predictive value of supervised machine learning models for insomnia symptoms through smartphone usage behavior.通过智能手机使用行为的监督式机器学习模型对失眠症状的预测价值。
Sleep Med X. 2024 May 4;7:100114. doi: 10.1016/j.sleepx.2024.100114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Examining terror management theory in Ukraine: impact of air-raid alarms and explosions on mental health, somatic symptoms, and well-being.在乌克兰检验恐惧管理理论:空袭警报和爆炸对心理健康、躯体症状及幸福感的影响。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 31;14:1244335. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1244335. eCollection 2023.
9
Never miss a beep: Using mobile sensing to investigate (non-)compliance in experience sampling studies.不错过任何一个哔哔声:使用移动感应技术研究(非)经验抽样研究中的依从性。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):4038-4060. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02252-9. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
10
Stress and Mood Associations With Smartphone Use in University Students: A 12-Week Longitudinal Study.大学生智能手机使用与压力和情绪的关联:一项为期12周的纵向研究。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2023 Sep;11(5):921-941. doi: 10.1177/21677026221116889. Epub 2023 Jan 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Can Programming Frameworks Bring Smartphones into the Mainstream of Psychological Science?编程框架能将智能手机带入心理科学的主流吗?
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 23;7:1252. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01252. eCollection 2016.
2
Toward Psychoinformatics: Computer Science Meets Psychology.迈向心理信息学:计算机科学与心理学的交汇
Comput Math Methods Med. 2016;2016:2983685. doi: 10.1155/2016/2983685. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
3
Recorded Behavior as a Valuable Resource for Diagnostics in Mobile Phone Addiction: Evidence from Psychoinformatics.记录行为作为手机成瘾诊断的宝贵资源:来自心理信息学的证据。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2015 Oct 19;5(4):434-42. doi: 10.3390/bs5040434.
4
The landscape of research on smartphone medical apps: Coherent taxonomy, motivations, open challenges and recommendations.智能手机医疗应用研究全景:一致的分类法、动机、开放性挑战和建议。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2015 Dec;122(3):393-408. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.08.015. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
5
Smartphone usage in the 21st century: who is active on WhatsApp?21世纪的智能手机使用情况:谁在WhatsApp上活跃?
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Aug 4;8:331. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1280-z.
6
The Smartphone Psychology Manifesto.智能手机心理学宣言。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 May;7(3):221-37. doi: 10.1177/1745691612441215.
7
Realizing the potential of mobile mental health: new methods for new data in psychiatry.认识到移动心理健康的潜力:精神病学新数据的新方法。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015 Aug;17(8):602. doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0602-0.
8
Soccer results affect subjective well-being, but only briefly: a smartphone study during the 2014 FIFA World Cup.足球比赛结果会影响主观幸福感,但这种影响很短暂:一项在2014年国际足联世界杯期间进行的智能手机研究。
Front Psychol. 2015 May 12;6:497. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00497. eCollection 2015.
9
The uses of smartphones and tablet devices in surgery: A systematic review of the literature.智能手机和平板设备在手术中的应用:文献系统综述
Surgery. 2015 Nov;158(5):1352-71. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.029. Epub 2015 May 9.
10
Time distortion associated with smartphone addiction: Identifying smartphone addiction via a mobile application (App).与智能手机成瘾相关的时间扭曲:通过移动应用程序(App)识别智能手机成瘾
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Jun;65:139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 10.