Pelly Fiona E, Broad Elizabeth M, Stuart Natalie, Holmes Mark A
a School of Health and Sport Sciences , University of the Sunshine Coast , Queensland , Australia.
b US Olympic Committee , Chula Vista , California , USA.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2018 Mar;41(2):208-215. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1317060. Epub 2017 May 4.
To investigate whether there are differences in the resting energy expenditure (REE) and body composition of athletes with a spinal cord injury (SCI) compared to active able-bodied controls.
In this cross sectional study, male athletes with a SCI were compared to active able-bodied controls matched for age, stretch stature and body mass. In addition, the accuracy of standard REE prediction equations in estimating REE was assessed.
Seven male wheelchair athletes with a SCI and six matched active able-bodied controls volunteered to participate.
REE was measured using indirect calorimetry and estimated using population-specific prediction equations. Body composition (lean tissue mass, fat mass and bone mineral content) was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
While absolute and adjusted REE in the athletes with SCI was lower than controls, this difference was not significant (P = 0.259). When adjusted for lean tissue mass (LTM), REE was significantly higher (P = 0.038) in the athletes with SCI compared to the controls (146 ± 29kJ/kg LTM vs. 125 ± 8kJ/kg LTM). LTM was significantly lower in the athletes with SCI (44.35 ± 6.98 kg) compared to the able-bodied controls (56.02 ± 4.93 kg; P < 0.01). The differences between predicted and measured REE in the athletes with SCI were not statistically significant (except for the Owen equation), however there was no significant correlation between the measures.
This suggests that existing prediction equations used to estimate energy requirements may require modification for athletes with SCI.
探讨脊髓损伤(SCI)运动员与健康活跃对照组相比,静息能量消耗(REE)和身体成分是否存在差异。
在这项横断面研究中,将男性SCI运动员与年龄、伸展身高和体重相匹配的健康活跃对照组进行比较。此外,评估了标准REE预测方程在估算REE方面的准确性。
7名男性SCI轮椅运动员和6名匹配的健康活跃对照者自愿参与。
使用间接测热法测量REE,并使用特定人群预测方程进行估算。通过双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量身体成分(瘦组织质量、脂肪质量和骨矿物质含量)。
虽然SCI运动员的绝对REE和校正后REE低于对照组,但差异不显著(P = 0.259)。在根据瘦组织质量(LTM)进行校正后,SCI运动员的REE显著高于对照组(P = 0.038)(146±29kJ/kg LTM对125±8kJ/kg LTM)。SCI运动员的LTM显著低于健康对照组(44.35±6.98 kg对56.02±4.93 kg;P < 0.01)。SCI运动员预测REE与实测REE之间的差异无统计学意义(欧文方程除外),但这些测量之间无显著相关性。
这表明用于估算能量需求的现有预测方程可能需要针对SCI运动员进行修改。