Suppr超能文献

个体特征与经验:囚徒困境中合作的实验研究

Individual Characteristics vs. Experience: An Experimental Study on Cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma.

作者信息

Barreda-Tarrazona Iván, Jaramillo-Gutiérrez Ainhoa, Pavan Marina, Sabater-Grande Gerardo

机构信息

LEE and Economics Department, Universitat Jaume ICastellón, Spain.

Departments of Management and Economics, Center for Experimental Research in Management and Economics (CERME), Università Ca'FoscariVenezia, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 20;8:596. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00596. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Cooperative behavior is often assumed to depend on individuals' characteristics, such as altruism and reasoning ability. Evidence is mixed about what the precise impact of these characteristics is, as the subjects of study are generally randomly paired, generating a heterogeneous mix of the two characteristics. In this study we ex-ante create four different groups of subjects by factoring their higher or lower than the median scores in both altruism and reasoning ability. Then we use these groups in order to analyze the joint effect of the two characteristics on the individual choice of cooperating and on successful paired cooperation. Subjects belonging to each group play first 10 one-shot prisoner's dilemma (PD) games with ten random partners and then three consecutive 10-round repeated PD games with three random partners. In all games, we elicit players' beliefs regarding cooperation using an incentive compatible method. Individuals with high altruism are more optimistic about the cooperative behavior of the other player in the one-shot game. They also show higher individual cooperation and paired cooperation rates in the first repetitions of this game. Contrary to the one-shot PD games where high reasoning ability reduces the probability of playing cooperatively, the sign of the relationship is inverted in the first repeated PD game, showing that high reasoning ability individuals better adjust their behavior to the characteristics of the game they are playing. In this sense, the joint effect of reasoning ability and altruism is not linear, with reasoning ability counteracting the cooperative effect of altruism in the one-shot game and reinforcing it in the first repeated game. However, experience playing the repeated PD games takes over the two individual characteristics in explaining individual and paired cooperation. Thus, in a (PD) setting, altruism and reasoning ability significantly affect behavior in single encounters, while in repeated interactions individual and paired cooperation reach similarly high levels independently of these individual characteristics.

摘要

合作行为通常被认为取决于个体特征,如利他主义和推理能力。关于这些特征的确切影响,证据并不一致,因为研究对象通常是随机配对的,导致这两种特征的混合参差不齐。在本研究中,我们通过将个体在利他主义和推理能力方面的得分高于或低于中位数进行因素分析,事前创建了四组不同的研究对象。然后我们使用这些组来分析这两种特征对个体合作选择和成功配对合作的联合影响。每组的研究对象首先与十个随机伙伴进行10次一次性囚徒困境(PD)博弈,然后与三个随机伙伴进行连续三轮、每轮10次的重复PD博弈。在所有博弈中,我们使用一种激励兼容的方法来引出参与者对合作的信念。在一次性博弈中,利他主义程度高的个体对其他参与者的合作行为更为乐观。在该博弈的首次重复中,他们的个体合作率和配对合作率也更高。与一次性PD博弈中高推理能力会降低合作概率不同,在首次重复PD博弈中,这种关系的符号发生了反转,表明高推理能力的个体能更好地根据他们所参与博弈的特征来调整自己的行为。从这个意义上说,推理能力和利他主义的联合效应不是线性的,推理能力在一次性博弈中抵消了利他主义的合作效应,而在首次重复博弈中则加强了这种效应。然而,重复PD博弈的经验在解释个体合作和配对合作方面超过了这两种个体特征。因此,在囚徒困境情境中,利他主义和推理能力在单次互动中会显著影响行为,而在重复互动中,个体合作和配对合作会达到类似的高水平,且与这些个体特征无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a8/5397528/17a3092b0be9/fpsyg-08-00596-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验