MacAskill Findlay, Lee Su-Min, Eldred-Evans David, Wulaningsih Wahyu, Popert Rick, Wolfe Konrad, Van Hemelrijck Mieke, Rottenberg Giles, Liyanage Sidath H, Acher Peter
Department of Urology, Southend University Hospital, Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex, UK.
Department of Urology, Weston General Hospital, Weston-super-Mare, Somerset, UK.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Aug;49(8):1335-1342. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1609-8. Epub 2017 May 5.
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density (PSAD) has potential to increase the diagnostic utility of PSA, yet has had poor uptake in clinical practice. We aimed to determine the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging-derived PSAD (MR-PSAD) in predicting transperineal sector-guided prostate biopsy (TPSB) outcomes.
Men presenting for primary TPSB from 2007 to 2014 were considered. Histological outcomes were assessed and defined as: presence of any cancer or significant cancer defined as presence of Gleason 4 and/or maximum tumour core length (MCCL) ≥ 4 mm (G4); or Gleason 4 and/or MCCL ≥ 6 mm (G6). Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were calculated, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were generated to compare MR-PSAD and PSA.
Six hundred fifty-nine men were evaluated with mean age 62.5 ± 9 years, median PSA 6.7 ng/ml (range 0.5-40.0), prostate volume 40 cc (range 7-187) and MR-PSAD 0.15 ng/ml/cc (range 0.019-1.3). ROC area under the curve (95% CI) was significantly better for MR-PSAD than PSA for all cancer definitions (p < 0.001): 0.73 (0.70-0.76) versus 0.61 (0.57-0.64) for any cancer; 0.75 (0.71-0.78) versus 0.66 (0.62-0.69) for G4; and 0.77 (0.74-0.80) versus 0.68 (0.64-0.71) for G6. Sensitivities for MR-PSAD < 0.1 ng/ml/cc were 85.0, 89.9 and 91.9% for any, G4 and G6 cancer, respectively.
MR-PSAD may be better than total PSA in determining risk of positive biopsy outcome. Its use may improve risk stratification and reduce unnecessary biopsies.
前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度(PSAD)有可能提高PSA的诊断效用,但在临床实践中的应用并不广泛。我们旨在确定磁共振成像衍生的PSAD(MR-PSAD)在预测经会阴扇形引导前列腺穿刺活检(TPSB)结果方面的诊断价值。
纳入2007年至2014年接受初次TPSB的男性。评估组织学结果并定义为:存在任何癌症或定义为存在 Gleason 4级和/或最大肿瘤核心长度(MCCL)≥4 mm(G4)的显著癌症;或 Gleason 4级和/或MCCL≥6 mm(G6)。计算敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值,并生成受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线以比较MR-PSAD和PSA。
对659名男性进行了评估,平均年龄62.5±9岁,PSA中位数为6.7 ng/ml(范围0.5 - 40.0),前列腺体积40 cc(范围7 - 187),MR-PSAD为0.15 ng/ml/cc(范围0.019 - 1.3)。对于所有癌症定义,MR-PSAD的曲线下面积(95%CI)显著优于PSA(p < 0.001):任何癌症的曲线下面积分别为0.73(0.70 - 0.76)和0.61(0.57 - 0.64);G4癌症为0.75(0.71 - 0.78)和0.66(0.62 - 0.69);G6癌症为0.77(0.74 - 0.80)和0.68(0.64 - 0.71)。对于任何癌症、G4癌症和G6癌症,MR-PSAD < 0.1 ng/ml/cc时的敏感性分别为85.0%、89.9%和91.9%。
在确定穿刺活检阳性结果的风险方面,MR-PSAD可能优于总PSA。其应用可能改善风险分层并减少不必要的活检。