Li Mengjuan, Chen Tong, Zhao Wenlu, Wei Chaogang, Li Xiaobo, Duan Shaofeng, Ji Libiao, Lu Zhihua, Shen Junkang
Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.
GE Healthcare Life Science, Shanghai 200000, China.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020 Feb;10(2):368-379. doi: 10.21037/qims.2019.12.06.
To evaluate the potential of clinical-based model, a biparametric MRI-based radiomics model and a clinical-radiomics combined model for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa).
In total, 381 patients with clinically suspicious PCa were included in this retrospective study; of those, 199 patients did not have PCa upon biopsy, while 182 patients had PCa. All patients underwent 3.0-T MRI examinations with the same acquisition parameters, and clinical risk factors associated with PCa (age, prostate volume, serum PSA, etc.) were collected. We randomly stratified the training and test sets using a 6:4 ratio. The radiomic features included gradient-based histogram features, grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), run-length matrix (RLM), and grey-level size zone matrix (GLSZM). Three models were developed using multivariate logistic regression analysis to predict clinically significant PCa: a clinical model, a radiomics model and a clinical-radiomics combined model. The diagnostic performance and clinical net benefit of each model were compared via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and decision curves, respectively.
Both the radiomics model (AUC: 0.98) and the clinical-radiomics combined model (AUC: 0.98) achieved greater predictive efficacy than the clinical model (AUC: 0.79). The decision curve analysis also showed that the radiomics model and combined model had higher net benefits than the clinical model.
Compared with the evaluation of clinical risk factors associated with PCa only, the radiomics-based machine learning model can improve the predictive accuracy for clinically significant PCa, in terms of both diagnostic performance and clinical net benefit.
为评估基于临床的模型、基于双参数MRI的放射组学模型以及临床-放射组学联合模型预测临床显著性前列腺癌(PCa)的潜力。
本回顾性研究共纳入381例临床怀疑患有PCa的患者;其中,199例患者活检后未患PCa,182例患者患有PCa。所有患者均接受了具有相同采集参数的3.0-T MRI检查,并收集了与PCa相关的临床风险因素(年龄、前列腺体积、血清PSA等)。我们以6:4的比例对训练集和测试集进行随机分层。放射组学特征包括基于梯度的直方图特征、灰度共生矩阵(GLCM)、游程长度矩阵(RLM)和灰度大小区域矩阵(GLSZM)。使用多变量逻辑回归分析开发了三个模型来预测临床显著性PCa:临床模型、放射组学模型和临床-放射组学联合模型。分别通过受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析和决策曲线比较每个模型的诊断性能和临床净效益。
放射组学模型(AUC:0.98)和临床-放射组学联合模型(AUC:0.98)均比临床模型(AUC:0.79)具有更高的预测效能。决策曲线分析还表明,放射组学模型和联合模型比临床模型具有更高的净效益。
与仅评估与PCa相关的临床风险因素相比,基于放射组学的机器学习模型在诊断性能和临床净效益方面均能提高对临床显著性PCa的预测准确性。