Liang Lei, Zhi Xin, Sun Ya, Li Huarong, Wang Jiajun, Xu Jingxu, Guo Jun
Department of Ultrasound, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Research Collaboration, R&D Center, Beijing Deepwise & League of PHD Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 2;11:610785. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.610785. eCollection 2021.
To evaluate the potential of a clinical-based model, a multiparametric ultrasound-based radiomics model, and a clinical-radiomics combined model for predicting prostate cancer (PCa).
A total of 112 patients with prostate lesions were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 58 patients had no prostate cancer detected by biopsy and 54 patients had prostate cancer. Clinical risk factors related to PCa (age, prostate volume, serum PSA, .) were collected in all patients. Prior to surgery, patients received transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), shear-wave elastography (SWE) and TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. We used the five-fold cross-validation method to verify the results of training and validation sets of different models. The images were manually delineated and registered. All modes of ultrasound radiomics were retrieved. Machine learning used the pathology of "12+X" biopsy as a reference to draw the benign and malignant regions of interest (ROI) through the application of LASSO regression. Three models were developed to predict the PCa: a clinical model, a multiparametric ultrasound-based radiomics model and a clinical-radiomics combined model. The diagnostic performance and clinical net benefit of each model were compared by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis and decision curve.
The multiparametric ultrasound radiomics reached area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85 for predicting PCa, meanwhile, AUC of B-mode radiomics and SWE radiomics were 0.74 and 0.80, respectively. Additionally, the clinical-radiomics combined model (AUC: 0.90) achieved greater predictive efficacy than the radiomics model (AUC: 0.85) and clinical model (AUC: 0.84). The decision curve analysis also showed that the combined model had higher net benefits in a wide range of high risk threshold than either the radiomics model or the clinical model.
Clinical-radiomics combined model can improve the accuracy of PCa predictions both in terms of diagnostic performance and clinical net benefit, compared with evaluating only clinical risk factors or radiomics score associated with PCa.
评估基于临床的模型、基于多参数超声的影像组学模型以及临床-影像组学联合模型预测前列腺癌(PCa)的潜力。
本回顾性研究共纳入112例前列腺病变患者。其中,58例经活检未检测出前列腺癌,54例患有前列腺癌。收集所有患者与PCa相关的临床危险因素(年龄、前列腺体积、血清PSA等)。手术前,患者接受经直肠超声(TRUS)、剪切波弹性成像(SWE)及TRUS引导下的前列腺活检。我们采用五折交叉验证法来验证不同模型训练集和验证集的结果。对图像进行手动勾勒和配准。提取所有超声影像组学模式。机器学习以“12 + X”活检的病理结果为参考,通过应用LASSO回归绘制良性和恶性感兴趣区域(ROI)。开发了三种模型来预测PCa:临床模型、基于多参数超声的影像组学模型和临床-影像组学联合模型。通过受试者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析和决策曲线比较各模型的诊断性能和临床净效益。
多参数超声影像组学预测PCa的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.85,同时,B模式影像组学和SWE影像组学的AUC分别为0.74和0.80。此外,临床-影像组学联合模型(AUC:0.90)比影像组学模型(AUC:0.85)和临床模型(AUC:0.84)具有更高的预测效能。决策曲线分析还表明,在广泛的高风险阈值范围内,联合模型比影像组学模型或临床模型具有更高的净效益。
与仅评估与PCa相关的临床危险因素或影像组学评分相比,临床-影像组学联合模型在诊断性能和临床净效益方面均能提高PCa预测的准确性。