Grandemange Erik, Perrin Pierre-Alexandre, Cvejic Dejean, Haas Miriam, Rowan Tim, Hellmann Klaus
Vetoquinol SA, Research and Development Centre, B.P. 189, 70204 Lure Cedex, France.
Klifovet AG, Geyerspergerstr 27, D-80689 Munich, Germany.
Porcine Health Manag. 2017 May 10;3:10. doi: 10.1186/s40813-017-0057-2. eCollection 2017.
Acute outbreaks of (APP) require rapid, effective, parenteral antimicrobial treatment. The efficacy and safety of a single, short-acting, high dose of marbofloxacin (Forcyl® swine 160 mg/mL) compared with 1 or 2 doses of 7.5 mg/kg enrofloxacin in APP outbreaks in European farms was studied.
A controlled, randomised block, blinded, multicentre, field study was conducted on four farms with acute respiratory disease associated with APP. Animals with clinical signs of respiratory disease were allocated similarly to intramuscular treatments of either a single dose 8 mg/kg marbofloxacin on day 0 or, 7.5 mg/kg enrofloxacin (Baytril 1nject®) on day 0 and again on day 2, if clinical signs had not improved.
The results were similar for intention to treat (242 pigs) and per protocol populations (239 pigs). On day 0, all pigs had pyrexia (means, 40.6 °C), moderate to severe clinical signs (depression, cough, dyspnoea). Following treatment, animals improved rapidly and on day 7, clinical signs were absent or mild in all pigs and mean temperatures for each treatment were <39.5 °C ( > 0.05). The primary efficacy criterion, animals cured, for marbofloxacin and enrofloxacin was 81.8 and 81.4% on day 7, and 84.2 and 82.2% on day 21, respectively. Results for cure, respiratory disease removals and mortalities, and relapses were compared using confidence intervals and confirmed that marbofloxacin was non-inferior to enrofloxacin ( > 0.05). There were no significant treatment differences in live weight gains, adverse events and injection site reactions (<2.5% animals) ( > 0.05). Significantly more animals developed concurrent disorders in the enrofloxacin (7.5%) than marbofloxacin (0.0%) group ( < 0.01). On day 0, the MIC values of APP for marbofloxacin and enrofloxacin were 0.06 μg/mL for APP, less than the clinical breakpoints.
Marbofloxacin (single dose of 8 mg/kg) and enrofloxacin (1 or 2 doses of 7.5 mg/kg) were clinically safe and effective in the treatment of clinical respiratory disease associated predominantly with APP in four European commercial, fattening pig herds.
猪传染性胸膜肺炎(APP)急性暴发需要快速、有效的肠外抗菌治疗。研究了单剂量、短效、高剂量的麻保沙星(Forcyl®猪用160mg/mL)与1或2剂7.5mg/kg恩诺沙星在欧洲农场APP暴发中的疗效和安全性。
在四个患有与APP相关的急性呼吸道疾病的农场进行了一项对照、随机区组、盲法、多中心现场研究。有呼吸道疾病临床症状的动物被类似地分配接受肌肉注射治疗,即第0天单剂量8mg/kg麻保沙星,或者如果临床症状没有改善,则在第0天和第2天分别注射7.5mg/kg恩诺沙星(拜有利1注射液®)。
意向性治疗人群(242头猪)和符合方案人群(239头猪)的结果相似。第0天,所有猪均发热(平均体温40.6°C),有中度至重度临床症状(精神沉郁、咳嗽、呼吸困难)。治疗后,动物迅速好转,第7天,所有猪的临床症状消失或轻微,各治疗组的平均体温均<39.5°C(P>0.05)。主要疗效标准,即治愈的动物,麻保沙星组和恩诺沙星组在第7天分别为81.8%和81.4%,在第21天分别为84.2%和82.2%。使用置信区间比较了治愈、呼吸道疾病消除、死亡率和复发率的结果,证实麻保沙星不劣于恩诺沙星(P>0.05)。在体重增加、不良事件和注射部位反应方面(<2.5%的动物),治疗组之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。恩诺沙星组(7.5%)出现并发疾病的动物明显多于麻保沙星组(0.0%)(P<0.01)。第0天,APP对麻保沙星和恩诺沙星的MIC值均为0.06μg/mL,低于临床断点值。
麻保沙星(单剂量8mg/kg)和恩诺沙星(1或2剂7.5mg/kg)在治疗四个欧洲商业育肥猪群中主要与APP相关的临床呼吸道疾病方面临床安全有效。