Suppr超能文献

在实验室和在线样本中反复未能实现选择性定向遗忘以及刺激的变化。

Repeated failures to obtain selective directed forgetting in lab and online samples and variations in stimuli.

作者信息

Akan Melisa, Sahakyan Lili

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , Champaign , IL , USA.

b Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , Champaign , IL , USA.

出版信息

Memory. 2018 Mar;26(3):294-305. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1327600. Epub 2017 May 15.

Abstract

Previous research has produced mixed findings as to whether it is possible to selectively forget a subset of items while maintaining access to the remaining items from the same episode, using a modified version of the list-method directed forgetting (LMDF) paradigm. The present study includes six attempts to obtain the selective directed forgetting (SDF) effect with the aim of exploring its underlying mechanisms. However, despite variations in the stimuli and samples, which included both lab and online participants, we failed to obtain SDF across five experiments. In one of the experiments, we observed what appeared to be an SDF effect; however, the unexpected baseline differences across the conditions make the interpretation of this result equivocal. In contrast, standard directed forgetting effect was obtained when an LMDF condition was included in the design. An evaluation of the previous literature in combination with the present study raises questions about the reliability of the SDF phenomenon.

摘要

以往的研究对于使用列表法定向遗忘(LMDF)范式的改进版本,是否有可能在选择性遗忘一组项目的同时,仍能获取来自同一事件的其余项目,得出了不一致的结果。本研究进行了六次尝试以获得选择性定向遗忘(SDF)效应,旨在探索其潜在机制。然而,尽管刺激和样本存在差异,包括实验室参与者和在线参与者,但我们在五个实验中均未获得SDF效应。在其中一个实验中,我们观察到了似乎是SDF效应的现象;然而,各条件之间意外的基线差异使得对这一结果的解释模棱两可。相比之下,当设计中包含LMDF条件时,获得了标准的定向遗忘效应。结合本研究对以往文献的评估,引发了对SDF现象可靠性的质疑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验