Suppr超能文献

与标准听诊法相比,数字听诊器用于检测儿童异常呼吸音。

Digital stethoscopes compared to standard auscultation for detecting abnormal paediatric breath sounds.

作者信息

Kevat Ajay C, Kalirajah Anaath, Roseby Robert

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Monash Health, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.

Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jul;176(7):989-992. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2929-5. Epub 2017 May 16.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Our study aimed to objectively describe the audiological characteristics of wheeze and crackles in children by using digital stethoscope (DS) auscultation, as well as assess concordance between standard auscultation and two different DS devices in their ability to detect pathological breath sounds. Twenty children were auscultated by a paediatric consultant doctor and digitally recorded using the Littman™ 3200 Digital Electronic Stethoscope and a Clinicloud™ DS with smart device. Using spectrographic analysis, we found those with clinically described wheeze had prominent periodic waveform segments spanning expiration for a period of 0.03-1.2 s at frequencies of 100-1050 Hz, and occasionally spanning shorter inspiratory segments; paediatric crackles were brief discontinuous sounds with a distinguishing waveform. There was moderate concordance with respect to wheeze detection between digital and standard binaural stethoscopes, and 100% concordance for crackle detection. Importantly, DS devices were more sensitive than clinician auscultation in detecting wheeze in our study.

CONCLUSION

Objective definition of audio characteristics of abnormal paediatric breath sounds was achieved using DS technology. We demonstrated superiority of our DS method compared to traditional auscultation for detection of wheeze. What is Known: • The audiological characteristics of abnormal breath sounds have been well-described in adult populations but not in children. • Inter-observer agreement for detection of pathological breath sounds using standard auscultation has been shown to be poor, but the clinical value of now easily available digital stethoscopes has not been sufficiently examined. What is New: • Digital stethoscopes can objectively define the nature of pathological breath sounds such as wheeze and crackles in children. • Paediatric wheeze was better detected by digital stethoscopes than by standard auscultation performed by an expert paediatric clinician.

摘要

未标注

我们的研究旨在通过使用数字听诊器(DS)听诊客观描述儿童哮鸣音和湿啰音的听力学特征,并评估标准听诊与两种不同DS设备在检测病理性呼吸音能力方面的一致性。由一名儿科顾问医生对20名儿童进行听诊,并使用Littman™ 3200数字电子听诊器和带有智能设备的Clinicloud™ DS进行数字记录。通过频谱分析,我们发现临床描述为哮鸣音的患者在100 - 1050Hz频率下,呼气期有突出的周期性波形段,持续时间为0.03 - 1.2秒,偶尔也会跨越较短的吸气段;小儿湿啰音是具有独特波形的短暂不连续声音。数字听诊器和标准双耳听诊器在哮鸣音检测方面有中度一致性,在湿啰音检测方面一致性为100%。重要的是,在我们的研究中,DS设备在检测哮鸣音方面比临床医生听诊更敏感。

结论

使用DS技术实现了对小儿异常呼吸音音频特征的客观定义。我们证明了在检测哮鸣音方面,我们的DS方法优于传统听诊。已知信息:• 异常呼吸音的听力学特征在成人中已有详细描述,但在儿童中尚未有报道。• 已证明使用标准听诊检测病理性呼吸音时观察者间的一致性较差,但目前易于获得的数字听诊器的临床价值尚未得到充分研究。新发现:• 数字听诊器可以客观地定义小儿病理性呼吸音如哮鸣音和湿啰音的性质。• 数字听诊器比专家儿科临床医生进行的标准听诊能更好地检测小儿哮鸣音。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验