Reyes-Castro Pablo A, Castro-Luque Lucía, Díaz-Caravantes Rolando, Walker Kathleen R, Hayden Mary H, Ernst Kacey C
Center for Studies on Health and Society, El Colegio de Sonora, Hermosillo, Sonora, México.
University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 May 17;11(5):e0005611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005611. eCollection 2017 May.
Government-administered adulticiding is frequently conducted in response to dengue transmission worldwide. Anecdotal evidence suggests that spraying may create a "false sense of security" for residents. Our objective was to determine if there was an association between residents' reporting outdoor spatial insecticide spraying as way to prevent dengue transmission and both their reported frequency of dengue prevention practices and household entomological indices in Hermosillo, Mexico.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A non-probabilistic survey of 400 households was conducted in August 2014. An oral questionnaire was administered to an adult resident and the outer premises of the home were inspected for water-holding containers and presence of Ae. aegypti larvae and pupae. Self-reported frequency of prevention practices were assessed among residents who reported outdoor spatial spraying as a strategy to prevent dengue (n = 93) and those who did not (n = 307). Mixed effects negative binomial regression was used to assess associations between resident's reporting spraying as a means to prevent dengue and container indices. Mixed effects logistic regression was used to determine associations with presence/absence of larvae and pupae. Those reporting spatial spraying disposed of trash less frequently and spent less time indoors to avoid mosquitoes. They also used insecticides and larvicides more often and covered their water containers more frequently. Their backyards had more containers positive for Ae. aegypti (RR = 1.92) and there was a higher probability of finding one or more Ae. aegypti pupae (OR = 2.20). Survey respondents that reported spatial spraying prevented dengue were more likely to be older and were exposed to fewer media sources regarding prevention.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results suggest that the perception that outdoor spatial spraying prevents dengue is associated with lower adoption of prevention practices and higher entomological risk. This provides some support to the hypothesis that spraying may lead to a "false sense of security". Further investigations to clarify this relationship should be conducted. Government campaigns should emphasize the difficulty in controlling Ae. aegypti mosquitoes and the need for both government and community action to minimize risk of dengue transmission.
为应对全球范围内的登革热传播,政府经常开展成蚊消杀工作。有传闻证据表明,喷洒杀虫剂可能会给居民营造一种“安全感错觉”。我们的目标是确定在墨西哥埃莫西约,居民将户外空间喷洒杀虫剂作为预防登革热传播的方式与他们所报告的登革热预防措施频率以及家庭昆虫学指标之间是否存在关联。
方法/主要发现:2014年8月对400户家庭进行了非概率抽样调查。向一名成年居民发放了一份口头调查问卷,并检查房屋外部场所是否有蓄水容器以及埃及伊蚊幼虫和蛹的存在情况。在报告将户外空间喷洒作为预防登革热策略的居民(n = 93)和未报告的居民(n = 307)中评估自我报告的预防措施频率。使用混合效应负二项回归来评估居民报告喷洒作为预防登革热手段与容器指数之间的关联。使用混合效应逻辑回归来确定与幼虫和蛹的存在与否的关联。报告进行空间喷洒的居民较少处理垃圾,在室内躲避蚊子的时间也较少。他们也更频繁地使用杀虫剂和杀幼虫剂,并且更频繁地遮盖他们的水容器。他们的后院有更多埃及伊蚊呈阳性的容器(相对风险 = 1.92),并且发现一只或多只埃及伊蚊蛹的概率更高(比值比 = 2.20)。报告空间喷洒预防登革热的调查受访者更有可能年龄较大,并且接触到的关于预防的媒体来源较少。
结论/意义:结果表明,认为户外空间喷洒可预防登革热的观念与预防措施采用率较低和昆虫学风险较高相关。这为喷洒可能导致“安全感错觉”这一假设提供了一些支持。应开展进一步调查以阐明这种关系。政府宣传活动应强调控制埃及伊蚊的难度以及政府和社区采取行动以尽量降低登革热传播风险的必要性。