O'Reilly Pauline, Lee Siew Hwa, O'Sullivan Madeleine, Cullen Walter, Kennedy Catriona, MacFarlane Anne
Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Republic of Ireland.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2017 May 18;12(5):e0177026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177026. eCollection 2017.
Interdisciplinary team working is of paramount importance in the reform of primary care in order to provide cost-effective and comprehensive care. However, international research shows that it is not routine practice in many healthcare jurisdictions. It is imperative to understand levers and barriers to the implementation process. This review examines interdisciplinary team working in practice, in primary care, from the perspective of service providers and analyses 1 barriers and facilitators to implementation of interdisciplinary teams in primary care and 2 the main research gaps.
An integrative review following the PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Following a search of 10 international databases, 8,827 titles were screened for relevance and 49 met the criteria. Quality of evidence was appraised using predetermined criteria. Data were analysed following the principles of framework analysis using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), which has four constructs: sense making, enrolment, enactment, and appraisal. The literature is dominated by a focus on interdisciplinary working between physicians and nurses. There is a dearth of evidence about all NPT constructs apart from enactment. Physicians play a key role in encouraging the enrolment of others in primary care team working and in enabling effective divisions of labour in the team. The experience of interdisciplinary working emerged as a lever for its implementation, particularly where communication and respect were strong between professionals.
A key lever for interdisciplinary team working in primary care is to get professionals working together and to learn from each other in practice. However, the evidence base is limited as it does not reflect the experiences of all primary care professionals and it is primarily about the enactment of team working. We need to know much more about the experiences of the full network of primary care professionals regarding all aspects of implementation work.
International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews PROSPERO 2015: CRD42015019362.
跨学科团队协作对于初级医疗改革至关重要,以便提供具有成本效益的全面护理。然而,国际研究表明,在许多医疗辖区,这并非常规做法。了解实施过程中的推动因素和障碍势在必行。本综述从服务提供者的角度审视初级医疗实践中的跨学科团队协作,并分析:1. 初级医疗中跨学科团队实施的障碍和促进因素;2. 主要研究差距。
按照PRISMA指南进行综合综述。在搜索10个国际数据库后,筛选了8827个标题的相关性,49个符合标准。使用预定标准评估证据质量。按照框架分析原则,运用归一化过程理论(NPT)对数据进行分析,该理论有四个构建要素:意义建构、参与、制定和评估。文献主要集中在医生和护士之间的跨学科协作。除了制定要素外,关于所有NPT构建要素的证据都很缺乏。医生在鼓励其他人参与初级医疗团队协作以及实现团队内有效的分工方面发挥着关键作用。跨学科协作的经验成为其实施的一个推动因素,特别是在专业人员之间沟通良好且相互尊重的情况下。
初级医疗中跨学科团队协作的一个关键推动因素是让专业人员共同工作并在实践中相互学习。然而,证据基础有限,因为它没有反映所有初级医疗专业人员的经验,且主要是关于团队协作的实施。我们需要更多地了解初级医疗专业人员整个网络在实施工作各个方面的经验。
国际系统综述前瞻性注册库PROSPERO 2015:CRD42015019362