• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development and psychometric validation of PUKAT 2·0, a knowledge assessment tool for pressure ulcer prevention.PUKAT 2.0 的制定与心理计量验证,一种用于预防压力性溃疡的知识评估工具。
Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):1041-1051. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12758. Epub 2017 May 26.
2
Pressure ulcer prevention: development and psychometric validation of a knowledge assessment instrument.压力性溃疡预防:知识评估工具的开发和心理测量学验证。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Apr;47(4):399-410. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.08.010. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
3
Psychometric validation of the Korean Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool.韩国压疮知识评估工具的心理计量学验证。
J Wound Care. 2023 Mar 2;32(3):172-181. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2023.32.3.172.
4
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the pressure injury knowledge assessment tool 2.0.压力性损伤知识评估工具2.0土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性。
J Tissue Viability. 2021 Nov;30(4):582-587. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 May 8.
5
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool-updated version (PUKAT 2.0).压疮知识评估工具土耳其语修订版(PUKAT 2.0)的信度和效度。
J Tissue Viability. 2022 Feb;31(1):52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
6
Medical device-related pressure injury knowledge assessment for nurses: development and psychometric validation of a multiple choice test.护士医疗器械相关性压力性损伤知识评估:多项选择测试的编制与心理测量学验证。
J Wound Care. 2023 Jun 1;32(Sup6a):lxxv-lxxxvi. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2023.32.Sup6a.lxxv.
7
Knowledge of nurses and nursing assistants about pressure ulcer prevention: A survey in 16 Belgian hospitals using the PUKAT 2.0 tool.护士和护理助理对压疮预防的认知:一项在比利时16家医院使用PUKAT 2.0工具进行的调查。
J Tissue Viability. 2019 May;28(2):59-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
8
Development and psychometric evaluation of an instrument to assess venous leg ulcer lifestyle knowledge among nurses.评估护士下肢静脉溃疡生活方式知识的工具的开发和心理计量学评估。
J Adv Nurs. 2011 Dec;67(12):2574-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05683.x. Epub 2011 May 19.
9
Development and Psychometric Properties of the Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge Questionnaire in Spanish Nurses.西班牙语护士压力性损伤预防知识问卷的编制及心理测量学特性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 28;17(9):3063. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093063.
10
Nurses' knowledge on pressure ulcer prevention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis based on the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool.护士对压疮预防的知识:基于压疮知识评估工具的最新系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 8;10:964680. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.964680. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Intensive Care Nurses' Perceptions, Knowledge, and Attitudes Toward Pressure Injury Prevention in Prone Position Patients: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study in Shanghai, China.重症监护护士对俯卧位患者压力性损伤预防的认知、知识和态度:中国上海的一项多中心横断面研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Sep 9;18:2935-2950. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S532825. eCollection 2025.
2
Intensive care nurses' knowledge of pressure injury prevention.重症监护护士对压疮预防的知识
BMC Nurs. 2024 Dec 2;23(1):876. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02533-4.
3
Evaluating the Knowledge of Home Caregivers on Pressure Ulcer Signs and Prevention in Elderly Patients in Al Ahsa.评估沙特东部省老年患者家庭护理人员对压疮体征及预防的知识水平。
Cureus. 2024 Nov 7;16(11):e73199. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73199. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
The pressure injury prevalence and practice improvements (PIPPI) study: A multiple methods evaluation of pressure injury prevention practices in an acute-care hospital.压力性损伤发生率和实践改进(PIPPI)研究:对一家急症医院压力性损伤预防实践的多种方法评估。
Int Wound J. 2024 Oct;21(10):e70050. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70050.
5
The Turkish version of the Skin Tear Knowledge Assessment Instrument (OASES): Validity and reliability study.皮肤撕裂知识评估工具(OASES)的土耳其语版本:效度与信度研究。
Int Wound J. 2024 Aug;21(8):e70013. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70013.
6
The knowledge and attitude on the prevention of pressure ulcers in Chinese nurses: A cross-sectional study in 93 tertiary and secondary hospitals.中国护士预防压疮的知识和态度:93 家三级和二级医院的横断面研究。
Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14593. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14593. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
7
Translation and validation: standard Chinese version of the skin tear knowledge assessment instrument (OASES).翻译与验证:皮肤撕裂知识评估工具(OASES)的标准中文版
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Jan 4;10(3):100183. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100183. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Swedish translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool for use in the operating room.瑞典语翻译、文化适应及手术室用压疮知识评估工具的心理计量学评估。
Int Wound J. 2023 May;20(5):1534-1543. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14008. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
9
Development and psychometric evaluation of an instrument to assess Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Family Caregivers at Preventing Pressure Injuries (KAP-PI) in Indonesian community-dwelling older adults.印度尼西亚社区居住老年人家庭照顾者预防压疮知识、态度与实践评估工具(KAP-PI)的开发及心理测量学评价
BMC Nurs. 2022 Aug 11;21(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00957-4.
10
Repositioning Practice of Bedridden Patients: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis.卧床患者的重新安置实践:一项概念演变分析
SAGE Open Nurs. 2022 Jun 13;8:23779608221106443. doi: 10.1177/23779608221106443. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the pressure ulcer prevention knowledge assessment instrument.压力性溃疡预防知识评估工具土耳其语版本的效度和信度
J Tissue Viability. 2016 Nov;25(4):201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
2
A Survey of Australian Nurses' Knowledge of Pressure Injury/Pressure Ulcer Management.澳大利亚护士压力性损伤/压疮管理知识调查
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2015 Sep-Oct;42(5):450-60. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000141.
3
Nursing students' knowledge and attitude on pressure ulcer prevention evidence-based guidelines: a multicenter cross-sectional study.护生对压疮预防循证指南的知识与态度:一项多中心横断面研究
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Apr;35(4):573-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.12.020. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
4
The prevalence, prevention and multilevel variance of pressure ulcers in Norwegian hospitals: a cross-sectional study.挪威医院压疮的患病率、预防措施及多层次差异:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jan;52(1):149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.07.005. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
5
The Pieper-Zulkowski pressure ulcer knowledge test.皮珀 - 祖科夫斯基压疮知识测试。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2014 Sep;27(9):413-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000453210.21330.00.
6
Getting evidence-based pressure ulcer prevention into practice: a multi-faceted unit-tailored intervention in a hospital setting.将基于证据的压疮预防措施付诸实践:医院环境下的多方面单位定制干预措施。
Int Wound J. 2016 Oct;13(5):645-54. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12337. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
7
Pressure ulcer knowledge of registered nurses, assistant nurses and student nurses: a descriptive, comparative multicentre study in Sweden.注册护士、助理护士和实习护士的压疮知识:瑞典一项描述性、比较性多中心研究
Int Wound J. 2015 Aug;12(4):462-8. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12138. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
8
The prevalence of pain at pressure areas and pressure ulcers in hospitalised patients.住院患者压疮及压痛点疼痛的患病率。
BMC Nurs. 2013 Jul 31;12(1):19. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-12-19.
9
Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment knowledge of Jordanian nurses.约旦护士的压疮预防与治疗知识。
J Tissue Viability. 2013 Feb;22(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
10
Nurses' knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention in ogun state, Nigeria: results of a pilot survey .尼日利亚奥贡州护士对压疮预防的认知:一项初步调查结果
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2012 Feb;58(2):24-32.

PUKAT 2.0 的制定与心理计量验证,一种用于预防压力性溃疡的知识评估工具。

Development and psychometric validation of PUKAT 2·0, a knowledge assessment tool for pressure ulcer prevention.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

O.L.V. van Lourdes Ziekenhuis Waregem, Waregem, Belgium.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):1041-1051. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12758. Epub 2017 May 26.

DOI:10.1111/iwj.12758
PMID:28547752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7949519/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a tool to measure the knowledge of nurses on pressure ulcer prevention. PUKAT 2·0 is a revised and updated version of the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool (PUKAT) developed in 2010 at Ghent University, Belgium. The updated version was developed using state-of-the-art techniques to establish evidence concerning validity and reliability. Face and content validity were determined through a Delphi procedure including both experts from the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP) and the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) (n = 15). A subsequent psychometric evaluation of 342 nurses and nursing students evaluated the item difficulty, discriminating power and quality of the response alternatives. Furthermore, construct validity was established through a test-retest procedure and the known-groups technique. The content validity was good and the difficulty level moderate. The discernment was found to be excellent: all groups with a (theoretically expected) higher level of expertise had a significantly higher score than the groups with a (theoretically expected) lower level of expertise. The stability of the tool is sufficient (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0·69). The PUKAT 2·0 demonstrated good psychometric properties and can be used and disseminated internationally to assess knowledge about pressure ulcer prevention.

摘要

本研究旨在开发一种测量护士预防压疮知识的工具。PUKAT 2·0 是比利时根特大学于 2010 年开发的压疮知识评估工具(PUKAT)的修订和更新版本。新版本使用最先进的技术开发,旨在建立关于有效性和可靠性的证据。通过包括欧洲压疮咨询小组(EPUAP)和国家压疮咨询小组(NPUAP)的专家在内的德尔菲程序(n = 15)确定了表面效度和内容效度。随后对 342 名护士和护理学生进行了心理测量学评估,评估了项目难度、区分力和反应选择的质量。此外,还通过测试-重测程序和已知群体技术建立了结构有效性。内容效度良好,难度水平适中。辨别力非常出色:所有(理论上预期)具有更高专业知识水平的组的得分都明显高于(理论上预期)具有较低专业知识水平的组。该工具的稳定性足够(组内相关系数=0.69)。PUKAT 2.0 具有良好的心理测量学特性,可在国际上用于评估预防压疮的知识,并进行推广。