Suppr超能文献

PUKAT 2.0 的制定与心理计量验证,一种用于预防压力性溃疡的知识评估工具。

Development and psychometric validation of PUKAT 2·0, a knowledge assessment tool for pressure ulcer prevention.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

O.L.V. van Lourdes Ziekenhuis Waregem, Waregem, Belgium.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):1041-1051. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12758. Epub 2017 May 26.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a tool to measure the knowledge of nurses on pressure ulcer prevention. PUKAT 2·0 is a revised and updated version of the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool (PUKAT) developed in 2010 at Ghent University, Belgium. The updated version was developed using state-of-the-art techniques to establish evidence concerning validity and reliability. Face and content validity were determined through a Delphi procedure including both experts from the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP) and the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) (n = 15). A subsequent psychometric evaluation of 342 nurses and nursing students evaluated the item difficulty, discriminating power and quality of the response alternatives. Furthermore, construct validity was established through a test-retest procedure and the known-groups technique. The content validity was good and the difficulty level moderate. The discernment was found to be excellent: all groups with a (theoretically expected) higher level of expertise had a significantly higher score than the groups with a (theoretically expected) lower level of expertise. The stability of the tool is sufficient (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0·69). The PUKAT 2·0 demonstrated good psychometric properties and can be used and disseminated internationally to assess knowledge about pressure ulcer prevention.

摘要

本研究旨在开发一种测量护士预防压疮知识的工具。PUKAT 2·0 是比利时根特大学于 2010 年开发的压疮知识评估工具(PUKAT)的修订和更新版本。新版本使用最先进的技术开发,旨在建立关于有效性和可靠性的证据。通过包括欧洲压疮咨询小组(EPUAP)和国家压疮咨询小组(NPUAP)的专家在内的德尔菲程序(n = 15)确定了表面效度和内容效度。随后对 342 名护士和护理学生进行了心理测量学评估,评估了项目难度、区分力和反应选择的质量。此外,还通过测试-重测程序和已知群体技术建立了结构有效性。内容效度良好,难度水平适中。辨别力非常出色:所有(理论上预期)具有更高专业知识水平的组的得分都明显高于(理论上预期)具有较低专业知识水平的组。该工具的稳定性足够(组内相关系数=0.69)。PUKAT 2.0 具有良好的心理测量学特性,可在国际上用于评估预防压疮的知识,并进行推广。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

10
Repositioning Practice of Bedridden Patients: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis.卧床患者的重新安置实践:一项概念演变分析
SAGE Open Nurs. 2022 Jun 13;8:23779608221106443. doi: 10.1177/23779608221106443. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

5
The Pieper-Zulkowski pressure ulcer knowledge test.皮珀 - 祖科夫斯基压疮知识测试。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2014 Sep;27(9):413-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000453210.21330.00.
9
Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment knowledge of Jordanian nurses.约旦护士的压疮预防与治疗知识。
J Tissue Viability. 2013 Feb;22(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Feb 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验