Department of Public Health, University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
O.L.V. van Lourdes Ziekenhuis Waregem, Waregem, Belgium.
Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):1041-1051. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12758. Epub 2017 May 26.
The aim of this study was to develop a tool to measure the knowledge of nurses on pressure ulcer prevention. PUKAT 2·0 is a revised and updated version of the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool (PUKAT) developed in 2010 at Ghent University, Belgium. The updated version was developed using state-of-the-art techniques to establish evidence concerning validity and reliability. Face and content validity were determined through a Delphi procedure including both experts from the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP) and the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) (n = 15). A subsequent psychometric evaluation of 342 nurses and nursing students evaluated the item difficulty, discriminating power and quality of the response alternatives. Furthermore, construct validity was established through a test-retest procedure and the known-groups technique. The content validity was good and the difficulty level moderate. The discernment was found to be excellent: all groups with a (theoretically expected) higher level of expertise had a significantly higher score than the groups with a (theoretically expected) lower level of expertise. The stability of the tool is sufficient (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0·69). The PUKAT 2·0 demonstrated good psychometric properties and can be used and disseminated internationally to assess knowledge about pressure ulcer prevention.
本研究旨在开发一种测量护士预防压疮知识的工具。PUKAT 2·0 是比利时根特大学于 2010 年开发的压疮知识评估工具(PUKAT)的修订和更新版本。新版本使用最先进的技术开发,旨在建立关于有效性和可靠性的证据。通过包括欧洲压疮咨询小组(EPUAP)和国家压疮咨询小组(NPUAP)的专家在内的德尔菲程序(n = 15)确定了表面效度和内容效度。随后对 342 名护士和护理学生进行了心理测量学评估,评估了项目难度、区分力和反应选择的质量。此外,还通过测试-重测程序和已知群体技术建立了结构有效性。内容效度良好,难度水平适中。辨别力非常出色:所有(理论上预期)具有更高专业知识水平的组的得分都明显高于(理论上预期)具有较低专业知识水平的组。该工具的稳定性足够(组内相关系数=0.69)。PUKAT 2.0 具有良好的心理测量学特性,可在国际上用于评估预防压疮的知识,并进行推广。