• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以卓越护理闻名的医院在基于价值的采购指标方面表现更佳。

Hospitals Known for Nursing Excellence Perform Better on Value Based Purchasing Measures.

作者信息

Lasater Karen B, Germack Hayley D, Small Dylan S, McHugh Matthew D

机构信息

1 Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.

2 Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.

出版信息

Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2016 Nov;17(4):177-186. doi: 10.1177/1527154417698144. Epub 2017 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1177/1527154417698144
PMID:28558604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5887159/
Abstract

It is well-established that hospitals recognized for good nursing care - Magnet hospitals - are associated with better patient outcomes. Less is known about how Magnet hospitals compare to non-Magnets on quality measures linked to Medicare reimbursement. The purpose of this study was to determine how Magnet hospitals perform compared to matched non-Magnet hospitals on Hospital Value Based Purchasing (VBP) measures. A cross-sectional analysis of three linked data sources was performed. The sample included 3,021 non-federal acute care hospitals participating in the VBP program (323 Magnets; 2,698 non-Magnets). Propensity score matching was used to match Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals with similar hospital characteristics. After matching, linear and logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between Magnet status and VBP performance. After matching and adjusting for hospital characteristics, Magnet recognition predicted higher scores on Total Performance (Regression Coefficient [RC] = 1.66, p < 0.05), Clinical Processes (RC = 3.85; p < 0.01), and Patient Experience (RC = 6.33; p < 0.001). The relationships between Magnet recognition and the Outcome and Efficiency domains were not statistically significant. Magnet hospitals known for nursing excellence perform better on Hospital VBP measures. As healthcare systems adapt to evolving incentives that reward value, attention to nurses at the front lines may be central to ensuring high-value care for patients.

摘要

众所周知,因优质护理而获得认可的医院——磁石医院——与更好的患者治疗结果相关。关于磁石医院与非磁石医院在与医疗保险报销相关的质量指标方面的比较,人们了解得较少。本研究的目的是确定磁石医院与匹配的非磁石医院在基于医院价值购买(VBP)指标上的表现如何。对三个相关数据源进行了横断面分析。样本包括3021家参与VBP项目的非联邦急症护理医院(323家磁石医院;2698家非磁石医院)。倾向得分匹配用于匹配具有相似医院特征的磁石医院和非磁石医院。匹配后,使用线性和逻辑回归模型来检验磁石状态与VBP表现之间的关系。在匹配并调整医院特征后,磁石认可预示着在总体表现(回归系数[RC]=1.66,p<0.05)、临床流程(RC=3.85;p<0.01)和患者体验(RC=6.33;p<0.001)方面得分更高。磁石认可与结果和效率领域之间的关系无统计学意义。以卓越护理闻名的磁石医院在医院VBP指标上表现更好。随着医疗保健系统适应奖励价值的不断变化的激励措施,关注一线护士可能是确保为患者提供高价值护理的核心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98b3/5887159/3d51be40a23e/nihms954126f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98b3/5887159/7678a95340a4/nihms954126f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98b3/5887159/3d51be40a23e/nihms954126f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98b3/5887159/7678a95340a4/nihms954126f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98b3/5887159/3d51be40a23e/nihms954126f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Hospitals Known for Nursing Excellence Perform Better on Value Based Purchasing Measures.以卓越护理闻名的医院在基于价值的采购指标方面表现更佳。
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2016 Nov;17(4):177-186. doi: 10.1177/1527154417698144. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
2
An advanced look at surgical performance under Medicare's hospital-inpatient value-based purchasing program: who is winning and who is losing?深入探讨在医疗保险的医院住院基于价值的购买计划下的手术表现:谁在赢,谁在输?
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jan;218(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.09.017. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
3
Magnet Hospitals and 30-Day Readmission and Mortality Rates for Medicare Beneficiaries.磁铁医院与医疗保险受益人的30天再入院率和死亡率
Med Care. 2021 Jan;59(1):6-12. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001427.
4
Association of Magnet Nursing Status With Hospital Performance on Nationwide Quality Metrics.磁性护理状况与全国质量指标下医院绩效的关联
J Healthc Qual. 2019 Jul/Aug;41(4):189-194. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000202.
5
Do Magnet®-Designated Hospitals Perform Better on Medicare's Value-Based Purchasing Program?磁铁®指定医院在医疗保险的基于价值的采购计划中表现更好吗?
J Nurs Adm. 2020 Jul/Aug;50(7-8):395-401. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000906.
6
The Association of Hospital Magnet Status and Pay-for-Performance Penalties.医院磁性状态与按绩效付费处罚的关联。
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2021 Nov;22(4):245-252. doi: 10.1177/15271544211053854. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
7
The role of community-level characteristics in comparing United States hospital performance by magnet designation: A propensity score matched study.社区层面特征在美国医院表现比较中磁体指定作用:倾向评分匹配研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 May;79(5):1939-1948. doi: 10.1111/jan.15446. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
8
Magnet® Hospital Recognition Linked to Lower Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Rates.磁铁医院认证与较低的中心静脉导管相关血流感染率相关。
Res Nurs Health. 2016 Apr;39(2):96-104. doi: 10.1002/nur.21709. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
9
Association of the Medicare Value-Based Purchasing Program With Changes in Patient Care Experience at Safety-net vs Non-Safety-net Hospitals.医疗保险基于价值的采购计划与安全网与非安全网医院患者护理体验变化的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Jul 8;3(7):e221956. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1956. eCollection 2022 Jul.
10
Understanding the Role of the Professional Practice Environment on Quality of Care in Magnet® and Non-Magnet Hospitals.了解专业实践环境对磁铁医院和非磁铁医院护理质量的作用。
J Nurs Adm. 2015 Oct;45(10 Suppl):S52-8. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000253.

引用本文的文献

1
Poor Patient Care Outcomes and Nurse Job Outcomes Associated With Unfavorable Intensive Care Unit and Emergency Department Nurse Work Environments: Implications for Critical Care Medicine.与重症监护病房和急诊科护士不良工作环境相关的患者护理不良结局及护士工作结局:对危重病医学的启示
Value Health. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2025.06.017.
2
The Impact of Nursing Resources on Chronic Wound Management: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.护理资源对慢性伤口管理的影响:一项横断面分析。
J Clin Nurs. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17804.
3
Evidence on the effectiveness of value-based payment schemes implemented in a hospital setting: A systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between the Value-Based Purchasing pay for performance program and patient mortality in US hospitals: observational study.美国医院基于价值的购买绩效薪酬计划与患者死亡率之间的关联:观察性研究。
BMJ. 2016 May 9;353:i2214. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2214.
2
Adding A Spending Metric To Medicare's Value-Based Purchasing Program Rewarded Low-Quality Hospitals.在医疗保险基于价值的采购计划中添加支出指标会奖励低质量医院。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 May 1;35(5):898-906. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1190.
3
Improving Medicare's Hospital Compare Mortality Model.
医院环境中实施的基于价值的支付方案有效性的证据:一项系统综述。
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Aug 29;13:327. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_873_23. eCollection 2024.
4
Hospital nurse managers' perspectives of the Magnet Recognition Program using an importance-performance analysis: A quantitative cross-sectional study.医院护士管理者对 Magnet 认可计划的看法:一项重要绩效分析的定量横断面研究。
Nurs Open. 2024 Aug;11(8):e70015. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70015.
5
Hospital Performance on Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and System Ratings: Associations With Nursing Factors.医院在医疗保健提供者和系统评分方面的表现与护理因素的关系。
Med Care. 2024 May 1;62(5):288-295. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001966. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
6
Nurse's experience working 12-hour shift in a tertiary level hospital in Qatar: a mixed method study.卡塔尔一家三级医院护士12小时轮班工作的经历:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Jun 20;22(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01371-0.
7
The Business Case for Magnet ® Designation : Using Data to Support Strategy.《磁性医院认证的商业案例:用数据支持战略》
J Nurs Adm. 2022 Sep 1;52(9):452-461. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000001182.
8
Challenging a Fundamental Proposition of Patient-Centeredness.挑战以患者为中心的一个基本命题。
J Best Pract Health Prof Divers. 2020 Fall;13(2):94-119.
9
The Association of Hospital Magnet Status and Pay-for-Performance Penalties.医院磁性状态与按绩效付费处罚的关联。
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2021 Nov;22(4):245-252. doi: 10.1177/15271544211053854. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
10
The implementation of a professional practice model to improve the nurse work environment in a Dutch hospital: A quasi-experimental study.实施专业实践模式以改善荷兰医院的护士工作环境:一项准实验研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Dec;77(12):4919-4934. doi: 10.1111/jan.15052. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
改进医疗保险的医院比较死亡率模型。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Jun;51 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1229-47. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12478. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
4
Magnet® Hospital Recognition Linked to Lower Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Rates.磁铁医院认证与较低的中心静脉导管相关血流感染率相关。
Res Nurs Health. 2016 Apr;39(2):96-104. doi: 10.1002/nur.21709. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
5
Comparison of the Value of Nursing Work Environments in Hospitals Across Different Levels of Patient Risk.不同患者风险水平医院护理工作环境价值的比较
JAMA Surg. 2016 Jun 1;151(6):527-36. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4908.
6
Missed nursing care is linked to patient satisfaction: a cross-sectional study of US hospitals.护理缺失与患者满意度相关:一项美国医院的横断面研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):535-43. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003961. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
7
Hospitals Known for Nursing Excellence Associated with Better Hospital Experience for Patients.以卓越护理闻名的医院与患者更好的就医体验相关联。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Jun;51(3):1120-34. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12357. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
8
Assessing Medicare's hospital pay-for-performance programs and whether they are achieving their goals.评估医疗保险的医院按绩效付费计划,以及这些计划是否实现了其目标。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Aug;34(8):1281-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0158.
9
Hospitals In 'Magnet' Program Show Better Patient Outcomes On Mortality Measures Compared To Non-'Magnet' Hospitals.与非“磁石”医院相比,参与“磁石”项目的医院在死亡率指标上显示出更好的患者治疗效果。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jun;34(6):986-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0793.
10
Changes in patient and nurse outcomes associated with magnet hospital recognition.与磁石医院认证相关的患者和护士结局的变化。
Med Care. 2015 Jun;53(6):550-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000355.