Suppr超能文献

儿童营养不良的双重负担还是双重计算?中低收入国家中发育迟缓与超重并存的方法学和理论意义。

Double burden or double counting of child malnutrition? The methodological and theoretical implications of stuntingoverweight in low and middle income countries.

机构信息

Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Aug;71(8):779-785. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209008. Epub 2017 May 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is increasing concern at research and policy levels about the double burden of child malnutrition (DBCM)-with stunting and overweight found across different groups of children. Despite some case studies suggesting that stunting and overweight can occur concurrently in children, here known as 'stuntingoverweight', and major drives to reduce all forms of malnutrition in low and middle income countries (LMICs), stuntingoverweight is continually overlooked. This research evidences the prevalence of stuntingoverweight across LMICs, exploring the theoretical and methodological implications of failing to acknowledge this form of malnutrition.

METHODS

Prevalence estimates of stuntingoverweight are constructed from 79 LMICs with nationally representative anthropometric survey data. Stunting and overweight estimates are amended to exclude stuntedoverweight children. These estimates are compared with those published in the Joint Child Malnutrition Estimates (JMEs)-evidencing overestimation and double counting of stuntedoverweight children.

RESULTS

Children can be concurrently stunted and overweight. Stuntedoverweight children are found in all LMICs, from 0.3% to 11.7% of under-fives and are included in both stunting and overweight rates. Analysed together, this leads to double counting of stuntedoverweight children. This artificial inflation of stunting and overweight rates can give a false impression of a DBCM, obscuring the true diversity of malnutrition present. Over 10 million children are stuntedoverweight in the world.

CONCLUSIONS

Stuntingoverweight is a newly recognised, understudied phenomenon. Affected children are included in both stunting and overweight prevalence estimates, introducing unobserved heterogeneity to both individual-level and population-level research and double counting to population-level research. Overlooking stuntedoverweight children has great implications for methodology, theory, policies, programmes and the health of affected children.

摘要

背景

在研究和政策层面上,人们越来越关注儿童营养双重负担(DBCM)——不同儿童群体中存在发育迟缓与超重现象。尽管一些案例研究表明,儿童可能同时存在发育迟缓与超重,即“超重型发育迟缓”,且中低收入国家(LMICs)主要致力于减少所有形式的营养不良,但超重型发育迟缓仍未得到重视。本研究证实了超重型发育迟缓在 LMICs 中的普遍存在,探讨了忽视这种营养不良形式的理论和方法学意义。

方法

从具有全国代表性人体测量调查数据的 79 个 LMIC 中构建超重型发育迟缓的流行率估计值。将发育迟缓与超重的估计值进行修正,排除超重型发育迟缓的儿童。将这些估计值与联合儿童营养不良估计数(JME)中的估计值进行比较,表明存在对超重型发育迟缓儿童的高估和重复计数。

结果

儿童可能同时存在发育迟缓与超重。在所有的 LMIC 中都发现了超重型发育迟缓的儿童,0.3%至 11.7%的五岁以下儿童属于这一类别,且同时被归入发育迟缓与超重的比例中。如果一起分析,这会导致对超重型发育迟缓儿童的重复计数。这种对发育迟缓与超重比例的人为夸大可能会给人造成 DBCM 的错误印象,掩盖了当前营养不良的真实多样性。世界上有超过 1000 万名超重型发育迟缓的儿童。

结论

超重型发育迟缓是一种新出现的、研究不足的现象。受影响的儿童同时被纳入发育迟缓与超重的流行率估计中,这为个体和人群层面的研究引入了未观察到的异质性,并对人群层面的研究造成了重复计数。忽视超重型发育迟缓儿童对方法学、理论、政策、项目和受影响儿童的健康都具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dd6/5537509/360cd89c60a7/jech-2017-209008f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验