• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估经静脉导线拔除患者死亡风险的风险评分。

Risk score to assess mortality risk in patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction.

作者信息

Oszczygieł Ewa, Kutarski Andrzej, Oszczygieł Andrzej, Mańkowska-Załuska Beata, Chudzik Michał, Wranicz Jerzy Krzysztof, Cygankiewicz Iwona

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Heart Rhythm Disorders, Medical University, Łódź, Poland.

Departmenf of Cardiology, Medical University, Lublin, Poland.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Aug;40(8):918-923. doi: 10.1111/pace.13127. Epub 2017 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1111/pace.13127
PMID:28569386
Abstract

AIMS

The main aim of this study was to assess 1-year mortality and its predictors in a cohort of patients who underwent transvenous lead extraction (TLE) procedure.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and 1-year follow-up of patients referred for a TLE procedure in a single, high-volume center between June 2006 and October 2014 was performed.

RESULTS

The studied population included 130 patients (82 males; mean age 64 ± 15 years) implanted with pacemakers (74%), implantable cardioverter defibrillators (15%), or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (11%). Indications for the extraction included infective endocarditis (40.5%), pocket infection (18.5%), and lead fault or failure (41%). Total radiological success rate was 90% while clinical success rate was 93.5%. The cumulative 1-year mortality was 28%. Mortality was higher in a group of older patients (94.4% vs 68%, P = 0.001) and those with chronic kidney disease (33.3% vs 4.3 %, P = 0.0002) as well as in patients after removal of high voltage lead (88.9% vs 26.3%, P = 0.01). Higher mortality was also related to infection as an indication for TLE (37.2% vs 13.5%, P = 0.002). Following these findings a new risk score model named IKAR (I = infective indications; K = kidney dysfunction; A = age ≥ 56; R = removal of high voltage lead) was constructed. Patients with IKAR score ≥3 points were characterized by 79% mortality as compared to 16% in those with a score 1-2 points.

CONCLUSIONS

One-year mortality of patients undergoing TLE procedure can be predicted by using IKAR risk score.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是评估接受经静脉导线拔除术(TLE)的患者队列的1年死亡率及其预测因素。

方法

对2006年6月至2014年10月期间在一个高容量单一中心接受TLE手术的患者的临床特征进行回顾性分析,并进行1年随访。

结果

研究人群包括130例患者(82例男性;平均年龄64±15岁),植入起搏器的患者占74%,植入式心脏复律除颤器的患者占15%,心脏再同步化治疗除颤器的患者占11%。拔除导线的指征包括感染性心内膜炎(40.5%)、囊袋感染(18.5%)和导线故障或失效(41%)。总放射学成功率为90%,临床成功率为93.5%。1年累计死亡率为28%。老年患者组(94.4%对68%,P=0.001)、患有慢性肾病的患者(33.3%对4.3%,P=0.0002)以及拔除高压导线后的患者(88.9%对26.3%,P=0.01)的死亡率更高。较高的死亡率也与作为TLE指征的感染有关(37.2%对13.5%,P=0.002)。基于这些发现,构建了一个名为IKAR的新风险评分模型(I=感染指征;K=肾功能不全;A=年龄≥56岁;R=拔除高压导线)。IKAR评分≥3分的患者死亡率为79%,而评分1-2分的患者死亡率为16%。

结论

使用IKAR风险评分可以预测接受TLE手术患者的1年死亡率。

相似文献

1
Risk score to assess mortality risk in patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction.评估经静脉导线拔除患者死亡风险的风险评分。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Aug;40(8):918-923. doi: 10.1111/pace.13127. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
2
Long-term mortality after transvenous lead extraction.经静脉导线拔除后的长期死亡率。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Apr;5(2):252-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.965277. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
3
Risk Factors and Long-Term Survival of Octogenarians and Nonagenarians Undergoing Transvenous Lead Extraction Procedures.八旬和九旬患者行经静脉心脏起搏器和除颤器导线拔除术的风险因素和长期生存。
Gerontology. 2021;67(1):36-48. doi: 10.1159/000511358. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
4
Nomogram for predicting 30-day all-cause mortality after transvenous pacemaker and defibrillator lead extraction.经静脉起搏器和除颤器导线拔除术后30天全因死亡率预测列线图。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Dec;12(12):2381-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.07.024. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
5
Long-Term Outcomes Following Transvenous Lead Extraction.经静脉导线拔除后的长期预后
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Apr;39(4):345-51. doi: 10.1111/pace.12812. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
6
Long-term survival following transvenous lead extraction: Importance of indication and comorbidities.经静脉导线拔除后的长期生存:适应证和合并症的重要性。
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Sep;18(9):1566-1576. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 10.
7
The analysis of indications and early results of transvenous lead extraction in patients with a pacemaker, ICD and CRT - single-center experience.起搏器、植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)和心脏再同步治疗(CRT)患者经静脉导线拔除的适应证分析及早期结果——单中心经验
Acta Cardiol. 2015 Dec;70(6):685-92. doi: 10.2143/AC.70.6.3120181.
8
Clinical predictors of adverse patient outcomes in an experience of more than 5000 chronic endovascular pacemaker and defibrillator lead extractions.在超过 5000 例慢性血管内起搏器和除颤器导联拔除的经验中,预测患者不良结局的临床因素。
Heart Rhythm. 2014 May;11(5):799-805. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
9
Lead-related infective endocarditis: Factors influencing early and long-term survival in patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction.铅相关感染性心内膜炎:影响经静脉拔除导线患者早期和长期生存的因素。
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Jan;14(1):43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
10
Predictors of short-term mortality in patients undergoing a successful uncomplicated extraction procedure.成功施行简单非复杂拔牙术后短期死亡的预测因子。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 May;31(5):1155-1162. doi: 10.1111/jce.14436. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuous, In Situ Targeted, Ultrahigh-Concentration Antibiotics for Infections from Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: The First Taiwan Case Series.用于心脏植入式电子设备感染的连续、原位靶向、超高浓度抗生素:首例台湾病例系列
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2025 Jul;41(4):549-556. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202507_41(4).20250324C.
2
Outcome and microbiological findings of patients with cardiac implantable electronic device infection.心脏植入式电子设备感染患者的转归和微生物学发现。
Heart Vessels. 2024 Jul;39(7):626-639. doi: 10.1007/s00380-024-02380-y. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
3
Incomplete Lead Removal During the Extraction Procedure: Predisposing Factors and Impact on Long-Term Survival in Infectious and Non-Infectious Cases: Analysis of 3741 Procedures.
拔牙过程中铅去除不完全:感染性和非感染性病例的易感因素及对长期生存的影响:3741例手术分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 13;12(8):2837. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082837.
4
Temporal trends in incidence, patient characteristics, microbiology and in-hospital mortality in patients with infective endocarditis: a contemporary analysis of 86,469 cases between 2007 and 2019.2007 年至 2019 年期间 86469 例感染性心内膜炎患者的发病率、患者特征、微生物学和住院死亡率的时间趋势:当代分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Feb;113(2):205-215. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02100-4. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
5
Transesophageal Echocardiography As a Monitoring Tool During Transvenous Lead Extraction-Does It Improve Procedure Effectiveness?经食管超声心动图作为经静脉导线拔除术中的监测工具——它能提高手术效果吗?
J Clin Med. 2020 May 8;9(5):1382. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051382.
6
Transvenous Lead Extraction SAFeTY Score for Risk Stratification and Proper Patient Selection for Removal Procedures Using Mechanical Tools.经静脉导线拔除术用于风险分层及使用机械工具进行拔除手术时恰当患者选择的安全评分
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 28;9(2):361. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020361.
7
Transvenous lead extraction: Can it be simple yet safe?经静脉导线拔除术:能否既简单又安全?
Anatol J Cardiol. 2017 Oct;18(4):296-297. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.25858.