Bourel-Ponchel Emilie, Mahmoudzadeh Mahdi, Delignières Aline, Berquin Patrick, Wallois Fabrice
INSERM U 1105, GRAMFC, CURS, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Amiens, F-80054 Amiens, France; Service d'explorations fonctionnelles du système nerveux pédiatrique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Amiens, F-80054 Amiens, France.
INSERM U 1105, GRAMFC, CURS, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Amiens, F-80054 Amiens, France; Service d'explorations fonctionnelles du système nerveux pédiatrique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Amiens, F-80054 Amiens, France.
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 May 13;15:359-366. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.05.004. eCollection 2017.
Although infantile spasms can be caused by a variety of etiologies, the clinical features are stereotypical. The neuronal and vascular mechanisms that contribute to the emergence of infantile spasms are not well understood. We performed a multimodal study by simultaneously recording electroencephalogram and functional Near-infrared spectroscopy in an intentionally heterogeneous population of six children with spasms in clusters. Regardless of the etiology, spasms were accompanied by two phases of hemodynamic changes; an initial change in the cerebral blood volume (simultaneously with each spasm) followed by a neurovascular coupling in all children except for the one with a large porencephalic cyst. Changes in cerebral blood volume, like the neurovascular coupling, occurred over frontal areas in all patients regardless of any brain damage suggesting a diffuse hemodynamic cortical response. The simultaneous motor activation and changes in cerebral blood volume might result from the involvement of the brainstem. The inconstant neurovascular coupling phase suggests a diffuse activation of the brain likely resulting too from the brainstem involvement that might trigger diffuse changes in cortical excitability.
尽管婴儿痉挛症可由多种病因引起,但其临床特征具有刻板性。导致婴儿痉挛症出现的神经元和血管机制尚未完全明确。我们对一组6名患有成串痉挛的儿童进行了多模态研究,同时记录脑电图和功能性近红外光谱。无论病因如何,痉挛均伴有两个阶段的血流动力学变化;首先是脑血容量的初始变化(与每次痉挛同时发生),随后除了一名患有大的脑穿通畸形囊肿的儿童外,所有儿童均出现神经血管耦合。所有患者无论有无脑损伤,脑血容量的变化均发生在额叶区域,如同神经血管耦合一样,提示存在弥漫性血流动力学皮质反应。同时出现的运动激活和脑血容量变化可能是由于脑干受累所致。不稳定的神经血管耦合阶段提示大脑可能发生弥漫性激活,这也可能是由于脑干受累引发皮质兴奋性的弥漫性变化所致。