Suppr超能文献

压力性尿失禁女性疾病认知问卷修订版中文版的心理测量学验证

Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised for women with stress urinary incontinence.

作者信息

Fan Yijun, Huang Zhaohui, Zhang Dazhao, Chang Jun, Jia Yun, He Shuihong, Wei Bing

机构信息

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.

Anhui Provincial Family Planning Institute of Science and Technology, Hefei, Anhui, China.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017 Aug;43(8):1305-1316. doi: 10.1111/jog.13351. Epub 2017 Jun 6.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised (IPQ-R) in patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

METHODS

A total of 256 patients with SUI and 76 patients with myoma of the uterus were recruited to complete the Chinese IPQ-R. For the reliability, the key tests included Cronbach's α coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficients. For the validity, the key tests included factor analysis, Spearman's correlation coefficient, and the Student's t-test.

RESULTS

Cronbach's α values ranged from 0.68 to 0.90 for each subscale and the intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.80 to 0.94. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis showed that the seven-factor structure as proposed by the original IPQ-R fit the data poorly. Although removal of three items improved the model's fit, the goodness-of-fit statistics were still below acceptable standards. We identified an acceptable seven-factor solution from the 38 items on Illness Beliefs using an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), which accounted for 68.12% of the variance. For the concurrent validity, Consequences and Emotional Representation both had good correlations with anxiety and depression (r = 0.52-0.62) and better quality of life (r = 0.58-0.73). The inter-correlation coefficient of the seven factors ranged from 0.05 to 0.59, suggesting acceptable discriminant validity. There were significant differences on the scale scores of Disease Identity (t = 9.39, P < 0.01), Timeline-Acute/Chronic (t = 3.69, P < 0.01), Consequences (t = 4.53, P < 0.01), Illness Coherence (t = 7.73, P < 0.01), Timeline-Cyclical (t = 6.48, P < 0.01), Emotional Representation (t = 6.40, P < 0.01), and Cause (t = 4.29, P < 0.01) between the patients with SUI and with myoma of the uterus, which also indicated acceptable discriminant validity.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study supported the Chinese IPQ-R as being a reliable and valid tool for measuring illness perception among patients with SUI.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验修订后的疾病认知问卷(IPQ-R)在压力性尿失禁(SUI)患者中的信度和效度。

方法

共招募了256例SUI患者和76例子宫肌瘤患者来完成中文版IPQ-R。对于信度,关键测试包括克朗巴哈α系数和组内相关系数。对于效度,关键测试包括因子分析、斯皮尔曼相关系数和学生t检验。

结果

各分量表的克朗巴哈α值在0.68至0.90之间,组内相关系数在0.80至0.94之间。验证性因子分析结果表明,原始IPQ-R提出的七因子结构与数据拟合不佳。虽然删除三个项目改善了模型的拟合,但拟合优度统计仍低于可接受标准。我们使用探索性因子分析(EFA)从38个疾病信念项目中确定了一个可接受的七因子解决方案,该方案解释了68.12%的方差。对于同时效度,后果和情感表征与焦虑和抑郁均具有良好的相关性(r = 0.52 - 0.62),与生活质量的相关性更好(r = 0.58 - 0.73)。七个因子的相互相关系数在0.05至0.59之间,表明具有可接受的区分效度。SUI患者和子宫肌瘤患者在疾病认同(t = 9.39,P < 0.01)、时间线 - 急性/慢性(t = 3.69,P < 0.01)、后果(t = 4.53,P < 0.01)、疾病连贯性(t = 7.73,P < 0.01)、时间线 - 周期性(t = 6.48,P < 0.01)、情感表征(t = 6.40,P < 0.01)和病因(t = 4.29,P < 0.01)的量表得分上存在显著差异,这也表明具有可接受的区分效度。

结论

本研究结果支持中文版IPQ-R作为测量SUI患者疾病认知的可靠且有效的工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验