Golder Su, Ahmed Shahd, Norman Gill, Booth Andrew
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 6;19(6):e195. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7082.
Although primarily used for social networking and often used for social support and dissemination, data on social media platforms are increasingly being used to facilitate research. However, the ethical challenges in conducting social media research remain of great concern. Although much debated in the literature, it is the views of the public that are most pertinent to inform future practice.
The aim of our study was to ascertain attitudes on the ethical considerations of using social media as a data source for research as expressed by social media users and researchers.
A systematic review was conducted, wherein 16 databases and 2 Internet search engines were searched in addition to handsearching, reference checking, citation searching, and contacting authors and experts. Studies that conducted any qualitative methods to collect data on attitudes on the ethical implications of research using social media were included. Quality assessment was conducted using the quality of reporting tool (QuaRT) and findings analyzed using inductive thematic synthesis.
In total, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. Attitudes varied from overly positive with people expressing the views about the essential nature of such research for the public good, to very concerned with views that social media research should not happen. Underlying reasons for this variation related to issues such as the purpose and quality of the research, the researcher affiliation, and the potential harms. The methods used to conduct the research were also important. Many respondents were positive about social media research while adding caveats such as the need for informed consent or use restricted to public platforms only.
Many conflicting issues contribute to the complexity of good ethical practice in social media research. However, this should not deter researchers from conducting social media research. Each Internet research project requires an individual assessment of its own ethical issues. Guidelines on ethical conduct should be based on current evidence and standardized to avoid discrepancies between, and duplication across, different institutions, taking into consideration different jurisdictions.
尽管社交媒体主要用于社交网络,且常被用于提供社会支持和信息传播,但社交媒体平台上的数据越来越多地被用于促进研究。然而,开展社交媒体研究中的伦理挑战仍然备受关注。尽管在文献中有诸多讨论,但公众的观点对于指导未来实践最为相关。
我们研究的目的是确定社交媒体用户和研究人员对将社交媒体用作研究数据源的伦理考量的态度。
进行了一项系统综述,除了手工检索、参考文献核对、引文检索以及联系作者和专家外,还检索了16个数据库和2个互联网搜索引擎。纳入了采用任何定性方法收集关于使用社交媒体进行研究的伦理影响的态度数据的研究。使用报告质量工具(QuaRT)进行质量评估,并采用归纳主题综合法分析研究结果。
共有17项研究符合纳入标准。态度各不相同,从过度积极(人们表达了此类研究对公共利益的本质重要性的观点)到非常担忧(认为社交媒体研究不应进行)。这种差异的潜在原因与研究目的和质量、研究人员所属机构以及潜在危害等问题有关。开展研究的方法也很重要。许多受访者对社交媒体研究持积极态度,但也提出了一些附加条件,如需要知情同意或仅限于在公共平台使用。
许多相互冲突的问题导致了社交媒体研究中良好伦理实践的复杂性。然而,这不应阻碍研究人员开展社交媒体研究。每个互联网研究项目都需要对其自身的伦理问题进行单独评估。伦理行为准则应以当前证据为基础并实现标准化,以避免不同机构之间的差异和重复,同时考虑不同的司法管辖区。