Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, 3/F., 161 Main Street, Ap Lei Chau Clinic, Ap Lei Chau, Hong Kong.
School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, 4/F, William M.W. Mong Block, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Patient. 2017 Dec;10(6):799-808. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0256-6.
Our aim was to compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients and the Hong Kong general population to identify how the mode of dialysis and other factors were associated with HRQOL.
We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 253 hemodialysis (HD) patients and 103 peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients recruited in 2014-2015. Their HRQOL was evaluated using Kidney Disease and Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36) sub-scale scores and the Short Form-6 Dimensions (SF-6D) health preference score. One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the difference in mean KDQOL-36 and SF-6D scores among PD patients, HD patients, and an exact age- and sex-matched general population. Multiple linear regressions were conducted to evaluate factors associated with the KDQOL-36 and SF-6D scores.
The physical HRQOL of ESRD patients on dialysis was worse than that of the age- and sex-matched general population (38.4 vs. 49.6), but mental HRQOL was similar (50.7 vs. 52.0). After adjusting for all baseline characteristics, male subjects was associated with higher physical component summary (PCS), SF-6D, and symptom scores. A higher level of education (secondary or tertiary) was associated with higher mental component summary (MCS), SF-6D, symptom, and effects scores. Patients who were female, younger, married, and less educated and had a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and did not achieve target hemoglobin and albumin levels were associated with poorer HRQOL outcomes.
HD was associated with a greater negative impact of ESRD on daily lives than was PD, which may be a consideration when deciding on the dialysis modality for first-line renal replacement therapy. To improve HRQOL among patients on maintenance dialysis, more attention should be paid to those with demographic risk factors, preventing CVD, and meeting clinical dialysis outcome targets such as hemoglobin and albumin levels.
本研究旨在比较终末期肾病(ESRD)患者与香港普通人群的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL),以确定透析方式和其他因素与 HRQOL 的相关性。
我们进行了一项横断面研究,纳入了 2014 年至 2015 年间招募的 253 名血液透析(HD)患者和 103 名腹膜透析(PD)患者。使用肾脏病生活质量量表 36 项简表(KDQOL-36)评分和健康调查简表 6 维度(SF-6D)健康偏好评分评估其 HRQOL。采用单因素方差分析比较 PD 患者、HD 患者和年龄、性别匹配的普通人群的 KDQOL-36 和 SF-6D 评分均值差异。采用多元线性回归分析评估与 KDQOL-36 和 SF-6D 评分相关的因素。
接受透析治疗的 ESRD 患者的生理 HRQOL 差于年龄和性别匹配的普通人群(38.4 分比 49.6 分),但心理 HRQOL 相似(50.7 分比 52.0 分)。调整所有基线特征后,男性患者的生理成分综合评分(PCS)、SF-6D 和症状评分较高。受教育程度较高(中学或大学)与心理成分综合评分(MCS)、SF-6D、症状和影响评分较高相关。女性、年龄较小、已婚、受教育程度较低、有心血管疾病(CVD)病史且未达到目标血红蛋白和白蛋白水平的患者,其 HRQOL 结局较差。
与 PD 相比,HD 对 ESRD 患者日常生活的负面影响更大,这可能是在决定一线肾脏替代治疗的透析方式时需要考虑的因素。为了提高维持性透析患者的 HRQOL,应更加关注具有人口统计学风险因素、预防 CVD 并达到血红蛋白和白蛋白水平等临床透析结局目标的患者。