• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在健康素养框架内评估 的信息质量和可用性:自 2016 年以来有哪些变化?

Assessing the information quality and usability of within a health literacy framework: What's changed since 2016?

机构信息

2080La Trobe University, Australia.

1994University of Technology Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Health Inf Manag. 2021 Jan-May;50(1-2):13-25. doi: 10.1177/1833358319864734. Epub 2019 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1177/1833358319864734
PMID:31370712
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7747035/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study examined the health literacy demands of My Health Record (MyHR) in the context of preparing for a government-announced opt-out system by repeating two studies of health information and usability conducted in 2016.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether Australia's MyHR meets the information and usability needs of people at risk of low health literacy and changes since 2016.

METHOD

: Informed by the 2016 methods and findings, measures of information quality, themes and target audiences were recorded and reported for each online consumer-facing health information resource. : An evaluation of the MyHR and supporting information website was conducted using a predetermined checklist of usability criteria. A list of usability violations for both websites was identified.

RESULTS

Total number of resources grew from 80 in 2016 to 233 in 2018. There was little change since 2016 to average readability levels, target audiences, presentation style, links between resources and usability of MyHR. Compared to 2016, this study demonstrated increases in resources from non-government organisations; video resources; translated resources; and resources with themes of privacy, security and post-registration use.

CONCLUSION

This study identified some improvements in information quality since 2016, but gaps remain in information quality and usability which may negatively impact the ability for people with low health literacy to access and use MyHR.

IMPLICATIONS

This study provides a framework for ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the suitability of MyHR for people at risk of low health literacy.

摘要

背景

本研究在为政府宣布的退出系统做准备的背景下,重复了 2016 年进行的两项健康信息和可用性研究,考察了 My Health Record(MyHR)的健康素养需求。

目的

检验澳大利亚的 MyHR 是否满足低健康素养人群的信息和可用性需求,以及自 2016 年以来是否发生了变化。

方法

根据 2016 年的方法和发现,记录并报告了每个面向消费者的在线健康信息资源的信息质量、主题和目标受众的措施。使用预定的可用性标准检查表对 MyHR 和支持信息网站进行了评估。确定了两个网站的可用性违规清单。

结果

资源总数从 2016 年的 80 个增加到 2018 年的 233 个。自 2016 年以来,平均可读性水平、目标受众、呈现风格、资源之间的链接以及 MyHR 的可用性几乎没有变化。与 2016 年相比,本研究表明,来自非政府组织的资源增加;视频资源;翻译资源;以及与隐私、安全和注册后使用主题相关的资源。

结论

本研究发现自 2016 年以来信息质量有所提高,但信息质量和可用性方面仍存在差距,这可能会对低健康素养人群获取和使用 MyHR 的能力产生负面影响。

意义

本研究为持续监测和评估 MyHR 对低健康素养人群的适宜性提供了框架。

相似文献

1
Assessing the information quality and usability of within a health literacy framework: What's changed since 2016?在健康素养框架内评估 的信息质量和可用性:自 2016 年以来有哪些变化?
Health Inf Manag. 2021 Jan-May;50(1-2):13-25. doi: 10.1177/1833358319864734. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
2
A content analysis of the consumer-facing online information about My Health Record: Implications for increasing knowledge and awareness to facilitate uptake and use.对面向消费者的 My Health Record 在线信息进行内容分析:提高知识和认识水平以促进采用和使用的意义。
Health Inf Manag. 2018 Sep;47(3):106-115. doi: 10.1177/1833358317712200. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
3
The E-health Literacy Demands of Australia's My Health Record: A Heuristic Evaluation of Usability.澳大利亚“我的健康记录”的电子健康素养需求:可用性的启发式评估
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2017 Oct 1;14(Fall):1f. eCollection 2017 Fall.
4
Evaluating the Contextual Integrity of Australia's My Health Record.评估澳大利亚“我的健康记录”的情境完整性。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 9;265:213-218. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190166.
5
Digital Health Literacy as a Predictor of Awareness, Engagement, and Use of a National Web-Based Personal Health Record: Population-Based Survey Study.数字健康素养作为国家网络个人健康记录的知晓度、参与度和使用度的预测因素:基于人群的调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 16;24(9):e35772. doi: 10.2196/35772.
6
Informational content, literacy demands, and usability of websites offering health-related genetic tests directly to consumers.向消费者直接提供与健康相关的基因检测服务的网站的信息内容、文化程度要求和可用性。
Genet Med. 2010 May;12(5):304-12. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181dbd8b2.
7
A health literacy and usability heuristic evaluation of a mobile consumer health application.一款移动消费者健康应用程序的健康素养与可用性启发式评估
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:724-8.
8
Applying usability methods to identify health literacy issues: an example using a Personal Health Record.应用可用性方法识别健康素养问题:以个人健康记录为例
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;183:179-85.
9
Improving accessibility of the Australian My Health Records while preserving privacy and security of the system.在保护系统隐私和安全的同时,提高澳大利亚我的健康记录的可访问性。
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2020 Oct 8;8(1):31. doi: 10.1007/s13755-020-00126-4. eCollection 2020 Dec.
10
Developing a Third-Party Analytics Application Using Australia's National Personal Health Records System: Case Study.利用澳大利亚国家个人健康记录系统开发第三方分析应用程序:案例研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Apr 24;6(2):e28. doi: 10.2196/medinform.7710.

引用本文的文献

1
Incorporating digital health into organizational health literacy: An updated definition, tools, and recommendations.将数字健康纳入组织健康素养:最新定义、工具及建议。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2025 Jul 8;38(5):8404704251356518. doi: 10.1177/08404704251356518.
2
Service Users' Perspectives on an Integrated Electronic Care Record in Mental Health Care: Qualitative Vignette and Interview Study.服务使用者对精神卫生保健中综合电子病历的看法:定性情景与访谈研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 3;13:e64162. doi: 10.2196/64162.
3
Optimising survivorship post-BMT: healthcare professionals' perceptions of long-term care.优化异基因造血干细胞移植后的生存状况:医疗保健专业人员对长期护理的看法。
Ann Hematol. 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1007/s00277-025-06398-8.
4
Usability Evaluation Methods Used in Electronic Discharge Summaries: Literature Review.电子出院小结中使用的可用性评估方法:文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 12;26:e55247. doi: 10.2196/55247.
5
The Implementation of Federated Digital Identifiers in Health Care: Rapid Review.在医疗保健中实施联合数字标识符:快速审查。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 8;26:e45751. doi: 10.2196/45751.
6
What drives the adoption of online health communities? An empirical study from patient-centric perspective.促使人们采用在线健康社区的因素是什么?一项基于以患者为中心视角的实证研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 23;23(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09469-6.
7
Knowledge of Australia's My Health Record and factors associated with opting out: Results from a national survey of the Australian general population and communities affected by HIV and sexually transmissible infections.澳大利亚“我的健康记录”相关知识及与选择退出相关的因素:对澳大利亚普通人群以及受艾滋病毒和性传播感染影响的社区进行全国性调查的结果
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Mar 1;2(3):e0000200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000200. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Digital Health Literacy as a Predictor of Awareness, Engagement, and Use of a National Web-Based Personal Health Record: Population-Based Survey Study.数字健康素养作为国家网络个人健康记录的知晓度、参与度和使用度的预测因素:基于人群的调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 16;24(9):e35772. doi: 10.2196/35772.
9
Patient participation in electronic nursing documentation: An interview study among home-care patients.患者参与电子护理文档记录:家庭护理患者的访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1508-1516. doi: 10.1111/hex.13492. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
10
"Dietitians May Only Have One Chance"-The Realities of Treating Obesity in Private Practice in Australia.“营养师可能只有一次机会”——澳大利亚私人执业中治疗肥胖症的现实情况
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 21;10(2):404. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020404.

本文引用的文献

1
The E-health Literacy Demands of Australia's My Health Record: A Heuristic Evaluation of Usability.澳大利亚“我的健康记录”的电子健康素养需求:可用性的启发式评估
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2017 Oct 1;14(Fall):1f. eCollection 2017 Fall.
2
A content analysis of the consumer-facing online information about My Health Record: Implications for increasing knowledge and awareness to facilitate uptake and use.对面向消费者的 My Health Record 在线信息进行内容分析:提高知识和认识水平以促进采用和使用的意义。
Health Inf Manag. 2018 Sep;47(3):106-115. doi: 10.1177/1833358317712200. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
3
Patient perspectives on a personally controlled electronic health record used in regional Australia.患者对澳大利亚地区使用的个人电子健康记录的看法。
Health Inf Manag. 2017 Jan;46(1):42-48. doi: 10.1177/1833358316661063. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
4
Use of the My Health Record by people with communication disability in Australia: A review to inform the design and direction of future research.澳大利亚沟通障碍者对我的健康记录的使用情况:一项为未来研究的设计和方向提供参考的综述。
Health Inf Manag. 2016 Dec;45(3):107-115. doi: 10.1177/1833358316652060. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
5
What do we know about developing patient portals? a systematic literature review.关于开发患者门户网站我们了解什么?一项系统的文献综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Apr;23(e1):e162-8. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv114. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
6
Evidence-based Heuristics for Evaluating Demands on eHealth Literacy and Usability in a Mobile Consumer Health Application.用于评估移动消费者健康应用中对电子健康素养和可用性需求的循证启发法
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:358-62.
7
Implementation of the Integrated Electronic Patient Portal in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review.儿科人群综合电子患者门户的实施:一项系统评价。
Telemed J E Health. 2016 Feb;22(2):144-152. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0033. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
8
Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review.患者门户网站与患者参与度:科学现状综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 23;17(6):e148. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4255.
9
Low health literacy and evaluation of online health information: a systematic review of the literature.低健康素养与在线健康信息评估:文献系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 7;17(5):e112. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4018.
10
Usability and Safety in Electronic Medical Records Interface Design: A Review of Recent Literature and Guideline Formulation.电子病历界面设计中的可用性与安全性:近期文献综述与指南制定
Hum Factors. 2015 Aug;57(5):805-34. doi: 10.1177/0018720815576827. Epub 2015 Mar 23.