• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字健康素养作为国家网络个人健康记录的知晓度、参与度和使用度的预测因素:基于人群的调查研究。

Digital Health Literacy as a Predictor of Awareness, Engagement, and Use of a National Web-Based Personal Health Record: Population-Based Survey Study.

机构信息

Centre for Global Health and Equity, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia.

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 16;24(9):e35772. doi: 10.2196/35772.

DOI:10.2196/35772
PMID:36112404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9526109/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Web-based personal health records (PHRs) have the potential to improve the quality, accuracy, and timeliness of health care. However, the international uptake of web-based PHRs has been slow. Populations experiencing disadvantages are less likely to use web-based PHRs, potentially widening health inequities within and among countries.

OBJECTIVE

With limited understanding of the predictors of community uptake and use of web-based PHR, the aim of this study was to identify the predictors of awareness, engagement, and use of the Australian national web-based PHR, My Health Record (MyHR).

METHODS

A population-based survey of adult participants residing in regional Victoria, Australia, was conducted in 2018 using telephone interviews. Logistic regression, adjusted for age, was used to assess the relationship among digital health literacy, health literacy, and demographic characteristics, and the 3 dependent variables of MyHR: awareness, engagement, and use. Digital health literacy and health literacy were measured using multidimensional tools, using all 7 scales of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire and 4 out of the 9 scales of the Health Literacy Questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 998 responses were analyzed. Many elements of digital health literacy were strongly associated with MyHR awareness, engagement, and use. A 1-unit increase in each of the 7 eHealth Literacy Questionnaire scales was associated with a 2- to 4-fold increase in the odds of using MyHR: using technology to process health information (odds ratio [OR] 4.14, 95% CI 2.34-7.31), understanding of health concepts and language (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.08-4.69), ability to actively engage with digital services (OR 4.44, 95% CI 2.55-7.75), feel safe and in control (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.43-3.88), motivated to engage with digital services (OR 4.24, 95% CI 2.36-7.61), access to digital services that work (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.32-4.69), and digital services that suit individual needs (OR 3.48, 95% CI 1.97-6.15). The Health Literacy Questionnaire scales of health care support, actively managing health, and social support were also associated with a 1- to 2-fold increase in the odds of using MyHR. Using the internet to search for health information was another strong predictor; however, older people and those with less education were less likely to use MyHR.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed strong and consistent patterns of association between digital health literacy and the use of a web-based PHR. The results indicate potential actions for promoting PHR uptake, including improving digital technology and skill experiences that may improve digital health literacy and willingness to engage in web-based PHR. Uptake may also be improved through more responsive digital services, strengthened health care, and better social support. A holistic approach, including targeted solutions, is needed to ensure that web-based PHR can realize its full potential to help reduce health inequities.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1969/9526109/df366121e573/jmir_v24i9e35772_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1969/9526109/df366121e573/jmir_v24i9e35772_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1969/9526109/df366121e573/jmir_v24i9e35772_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

基于网络的个人健康记录(PHR)有可能提高医疗保健的质量、准确性和及时性。然而,基于网络的 PHR 在国际上的采用率一直很低。处于不利地位的人群不太可能使用基于网络的 PHR,这可能会在国家内部和国家之间扩大健康不平等。

目的

由于对社区对基于网络的 PHR 的了解有限,本研究旨在确定澳大利亚全国性基于网络的 PHR(My Health Record,MyHR)的意识、参与和使用的预测因素。

方法

2018 年,我们在澳大利亚维多利亚州的地区使用电话访谈对成年参与者进行了一项基于人群的调查。使用逻辑回归(按年龄调整)评估数字健康素养、健康素养和人口统计学特征与 MyHR 的 3 个依赖变量(意识、参与和使用)之间的关系。使用多维工具测量数字健康素养和健康素养,使用电子健康素养问卷的所有 7 个量表和健康素养问卷的 9 个量表中的 4 个。

结果

共分析了 998 份回复。数字健康素养的许多要素与 MyHR 的意识、参与和使用密切相关。每个电子健康素养问卷量表增加 1 个单位,使用 MyHR 的几率就会增加 2 到 4 倍:使用技术处理健康信息(比值比[OR]4.14,95%CI 2.34-7.31)、理解健康概念和语言(OR 2.25,95%CI 1.08-4.69)、积极参与数字服务的能力(OR 4.44,95%CI 2.55-7.75)、感到安全和掌控(OR 2.36,95%CI 1.43-3.88)、有动力参与数字服务(OR 4.24,95%CI 2.36-7.61)、获得可行的数字服务(OR 2.49,95%CI 1.32-4.69)和适合个人需求的数字服务(OR 3.48,95%CI 1.97-6.15)。健康素养问卷的医疗保健支持、积极管理健康和社会支持量表也与使用 MyHR 的几率增加 1 到 2 倍有关。使用互联网搜索健康信息也是一个强有力的预测因素;然而,老年人和受教育程度较低的人不太可能使用 MyHR。

结论

本研究揭示了数字健康素养与基于网络的 PHR 使用之间存在强烈且一致的关联模式。结果表明,可能需要采取行动来促进 PHR 的采用,包括改善数字技术和技能体验,这可能会提高数字健康素养和参与基于网络的 PHR 的意愿。通过更具响应能力的数字服务、加强医疗保健和更好的社会支持,也可以提高采用率。需要采取整体方法,包括有针对性的解决方案,以确保基于网络的 PHR 能够充分发挥其潜力,帮助减少健康不平等。

相似文献

1
Digital Health Literacy as a Predictor of Awareness, Engagement, and Use of a National Web-Based Personal Health Record: Population-Based Survey Study.数字健康素养作为国家网络个人健康记录的知晓度、参与度和使用度的预测因素:基于人群的调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 16;24(9):e35772. doi: 10.2196/35772.
2
Patients' Willingness and Ability to Identify and Respond to Errors in Their Personal Health Records: Mixed Methods Analysis of Cross-sectional Survey Data.患者识别和回应个人健康记录错误的意愿和能力:基于横断面调查数据的混合方法分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 8;24(7):e37226. doi: 10.2196/37226.
3
Validity Evidence Based on Relations to Other Variables of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): Bayesian Approach to Test for Known-Groups Validity.基于与其他变量关系的电子健康素养问卷 (eHLQ) 的有效性证据:用于检验已知组有效性的贝叶斯方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 14;23(10):e30243. doi: 10.2196/30243.
4
A content analysis of the consumer-facing online information about My Health Record: Implications for increasing knowledge and awareness to facilitate uptake and use.对面向消费者的 My Health Record 在线信息进行内容分析:提高知识和认识水平以促进采用和使用的意义。
Health Inf Manag. 2018 Sep;47(3):106-115. doi: 10.1177/1833358317712200. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
5
A Multidimensional Tool Based on the eHealth Literacy Framework: Development and Initial Validity Testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ).基于电子健康素养框架的多维工具:电子健康素养问卷(eHLQ)的开发与初始效度测试
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 12;20(2):e36. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8371.
6
Listening to Communities: Mixed-Method Study of the Engagement of Disadvantaged Mothers and Pregnant Women With Digital Health Technologies.倾听社区声音:对弱势母亲和孕妇参与数字健康技术情况的混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 5;19(7):e240. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7736.
7
Consumers' perceptions about and use of the internet for personal health records and health information exchange: analysis of the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey.消费者对互联网用于个人健康记录和健康信息交换的认知与使用:2007年健康信息国家趋势调查分析
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Dec 18;12(4):e73. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1668.
8
Healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitude and its associated factors toward electronic personal health record system in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study.在资源有限的环境下,医疗保健专业人员对电子个人健康记录系统的知识、态度及其相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 15;11:1114456. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1114456. eCollection 2023.
9
Sociodigital Determinants of eHealth Literacy and Related Impact on Health Outcomes and eHealth Use in Korean Older Adults: Community-Based Cross-Sectional Survey.社会数字因素对韩国老年人电子健康素养的影响及其对健康结果和电子健康使用的相关影响:基于社区的横断面调查。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Aug 13;7:e56061. doi: 10.2196/56061.
10
Valuing Citizen Access to Digital Health Services: Applied Value-Based Outcomes in the Canadian Context and Tools for Modernizing Health Systems.重视公民对数字健康服务的获取:加拿大背景下基于价值的应用成果及卫生系统现代化工具
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 6;21(6):e12277. doi: 10.2196/12277.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond the interface: benchmarking pediatric mobile health applications for monitoring child growth using the Mobile App Rating Scale.超越界面:使用移动应用评分量表对监测儿童生长的儿科移动健康应用程序进行基准测试。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jun 18;7:1621293. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1621293. eCollection 2025.
2
Determinants of Digital Health Literacy: International Cross-Sectional Study.数字健康素养的决定因素:国际横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 30;27:e66631. doi: 10.2196/66631.
3
eHealth Solutions for Symptom Assessment and Monitoring in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of the English Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) with Health Science University Students in Nepal: A Validity Testing Study.尼泊尔卫生科学大学生使用英语健康素养问卷(HLQ):一项效度测试研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 9;19(6):3241. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063241.
2
Validity Evidence of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) Part 2: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Test Content, Response Process, and Internal Structure in the Australian Community Health Setting.电子健康素养问卷(eHLQ)第二部分的有效性证据:在澳大利亚社区卫生环境中评估测试内容、反应过程和内部结构的混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 8;24(3):e32777. doi: 10.2196/32777.
3
慢性肾脏病成人患者症状评估与监测的电子健康解决方案:一项系统综述
J Clin Nurs. 2025 Sep;34(9):3560-3591. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17827. Epub 2025 May 14.
4
Harnessing an Artificial Intelligence-Based Large Language Model With Personal Health Record Capability for Personalized Information Support in Postsurgery Myocardial Infarction: Descriptive Qualitative Study.利用具有个人健康记录功能的基于人工智能的大语言模型为术后心肌梗死提供个性化信息支持:描述性定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 30;27:e68762. doi: 10.2196/68762.
5
Health Literacy and Acceptance of COVID-19 Preventive Measures and Vaccination in the European Union: A Scoping Review.欧盟中健康素养与对COVID-19预防措施及疫苗接种的接受度:一项范围综述
Health Lit Res Pract. 2025 Jan;9(1):e46-e55. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20250219-01. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
6
Digital health literacy and sociodemographic factors among students in western Iran: a cross-sectional study.伊朗西部学生的数字健康素养与社会人口学因素:一项横断面研究
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 7;25(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06774-y.
7
Performance comparison in workflow efficiency between a remotely installed 3D workstation and an on-premises image processing workstation for dental cone-beam CT image reconstruction.远程安装的3D工作站与本地图像处理工作站在牙科锥形束CT图像重建工作流程效率方面的性能比较。
Oral Radiol. 2025 Jan 24. doi: 10.1007/s11282-025-00806-5.
8
The Association Between the Digital Divide and Health Inequalities Among Older Adults in China: Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey.中国老年人数字鸿沟与健康不平等之间的关联:全国代表性横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 15;27:e62645. doi: 10.2196/62645.
9
Variations in digital health literacy for pediatric caregivers of hospitalized children: implications for digital health equity.住院儿童的儿科护理人员数字健康素养的差异:对数字健康公平性的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Mar 1;32(3):572-578. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae305.
10
eHealth Literacy and Health-Related Internet Use Among Swedish Primary Health Care Visitors: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.瑞典初级卫生保健就诊者的电子健康素养与健康相关互联网使用情况:横断面问卷调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 5;8:e63288. doi: 10.2196/63288.
Validity Evidence Based on Relations to Other Variables of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): Bayesian Approach to Test for Known-Groups Validity.
基于与其他变量关系的电子健康素养问卷 (eHLQ) 的有效性证据:用于检验已知组有效性的贝叶斯方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 14;23(10):e30243. doi: 10.2196/30243.
4
Health Literacy Co-Design in a Low Resource Setting: Harnessing Local Wisdom to Inform Interventions across Fishing Villages in Egypt to Improve Health and Equity.健康素养共同设计在资源匮乏环境下的应用:利用本土智慧为埃及渔村的干预措施提供信息,以改善健康和公平状况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 24;18(9):4518. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094518.
5
Co-designing eHealth and Equity Solutions: Application of the Ophelia (Optimizing Health Literacy and Access) Process.共同设计电子健康和公平解决方案:奥菲莉亚(优化健康素养和获取)过程的应用。
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 20;8:604401. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.604401. eCollection 2020.
6
Towards a comprehensive, person-centred assessment of health literacy: translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric test of the Dutch Health Literacy Questionnaire.迈向全面、以人为本的健康素养评估:荷兰健康素养问卷的翻译、文化调适和心理计量学测试。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 2;20(1):1850. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09963-0.
7
Translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Ghanaian language (Akan; Asante Twi) version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire.《健康素养问卷》加纳语(阿坎语;阿散蒂特维语)版本的翻译、文化调适及心理测量学特性
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):1064. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05932-w.
8
Theory-based E-health literacy interventions in older adults: a systematic review.针对老年人的基于理论的电子健康素养干预措施:一项系统综述。
Arch Public Health. 2020 Aug 10;78:72. doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00455-6. eCollection 2020.
9
A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model.挪威版健康素养问卷的验证研究:一个稳健的九维度因素模型。
Scand J Public Health. 2021 Jun;49(4):471-478. doi: 10.1177/1403494820926428. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
10
Improving Organizational Health Literacy Responsiveness in Cardiac Rehabilitation Using a Co-Design Methodology: Results from The Heart Skills Study.运用共同设计方法提高心脏康复中组织健康素养回应性:来自心脏技能研究的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 5;17(3):1015. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031015.