Bourji Khalil I, Kelemen Benjamin W, Mathai Stephen C, Damico Rachel L, Kolb Todd M, Mercurio Valentina, Cozzi Franco, Tedford Ryan J, Hassoun Paul M
1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
2 Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Pulm Circ. 2017 Apr-Jun;7(2):409-420. doi: 10.1177/2045893217700438. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
Pulmonary hypertension due to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (PH-HFpEF) has been poorly studied in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). We sought to compare clinical characteristics and survival of SSc patients with PH-HFpEF (SSc-PH-HFpEF) versus pulmonary arterial hypertension (SSc-PAH). We hypothesized that patients with SSc-PH-HFpEF have a similar poor overall prognosis compared with patients with SSc-PAH when matched for total right ventricular load. The analysis included 117 patients with SSc-PH (93 with SSc-PAH versus 24 with SSc-PH-HFpEF) enrolled prospectively in the Johns Hopkins PH Registry. We examined baseline demographics and hemodynamics at diagnostic right heart catheterization (RHC), two-dimensional echocardiographic characteristics, six-minute walking distance (6MWD), treatment modalities, and laboratory values (serum NT-proBNP, creatinine, uric acid, and sodium), and assessed survival. Demographics and clinical features were similar between the two groups. Baseline RHC showed significantly higher pulmonary and right heart pressures in the SSc-PH-HFpEF compared with the SSc-PAH group. Trans-pulmonary gradient (TPG), however, was equally elevated without significant difference between the groups. SSc-PH-HFpEF patients had left atrial enlargement on echocardiography compared with SSc-PAH patients. No significant differences were found between groups for 6MWD, NT-proBNP, and other laboratory values. Although overall median survival time was 4.6 years with no difference in mortality rate between the two groups (SSc-PH-HFpEF versus SSc-PAH: 75% versus 59%; P = 0.26), patients with SSc-PH-HFpEF had a twofold increased risk of death compared with SSc-PAH patients after adjusting for hemodynamics. Concomitant intrinsic pulmonary vascular disease and HFpEF likely contribute to very poor survival in patients with SSc-PH-HFpEF.
射血分数保留的心力衰竭所致肺动脉高压(PH-HFpEF)在系统性硬化症(SSc)患者中研究较少。我们试图比较SSc合并PH-HFpEF(SSc-PH-HFpEF)患者与肺动脉高压(SSc-PAH)患者的临床特征和生存率。我们假设,当总右心室负荷相匹配时,SSc-PH-HFpEF患者与SSc-PAH患者的总体预后同样较差。分析纳入了前瞻性登记于约翰霍普金斯肺动脉高压登记处的117例SSc-PH患者(93例SSc-PAH患者和24例SSc-PH-HFpEF患者)。我们检查了诊断性右心导管检查(RHC)时的基线人口统计学和血流动力学、二维超声心动图特征、六分钟步行距离(6MWD)、治疗方式以及实验室检查值(血清N末端脑钠肽前体、肌酐、尿酸和钠),并评估了生存率。两组的人口统计学和临床特征相似。基线RHC显示,与SSc-PAH组相比,SSc-PH-HFpEF组的肺和右心压力显著更高。然而,跨肺压差(TPG)同样升高,两组之间无显著差异。与SSc-PAH患者相比,SSc-PH-HFpEF患者在超声心动图上有左心房扩大。两组在6MWD、N末端脑钠肽前体和其他实验室检查值方面未发现显著差异。尽管总体中位生存时间为4.6年,两组死亡率无差异(SSc-PH-HFpEF组与SSc-PAH组:75%对59%;P = 0.26),但在调整血流动力学后,SSc-PH-HFpEF患者的死亡风险是SSc-PAH患者的两倍。合并存在的内在肺血管疾病和HFpEF可能导致SSc-PH-HFpEF患者的生存率极低。