• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机森林中的树木计数:预测精神病学入院报告中的症状严重程度。

Counting trees in Random Forests: Predicting symptom severity in psychiatric intake reports.

机构信息

University of Antwerp, Computational Linguistics and Psycholinguistics (CLiPS) Research Center, Lange Winkelstraat 40-42, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Advanced Database Research and Modelling Research Group (ADReM), Middelheimlaan 1, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium; Antwerp University Hospital, ICT Department, Wilrijkstraat 10, B-2650 Edegem, Belgium.

University of Antwerp, Computational Linguistics and Psycholinguistics (CLiPS) Research Center, Lange Winkelstraat 40-42, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium; Antwerp University Hospital, ICT Department, Wilrijkstraat 10, B-2650 Edegem, Belgium.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2017 Nov;75S:S112-S119. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2017.06.007
PMID:28602906
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5705466/
Abstract

The CEGS N-GRID 2016 Shared Task (Filannino et al., 2017) in Clinical Natural Language Processing introduces the assignment of a severity score to a psychiatric symptom, based on a psychiatric intake report. We present a method that employs the inherent interview-like structure of the report to extract relevant information from the report and generate a representation. The representation consists of a restricted set of psychiatric concepts (and the context they occur in), identified using medical concepts defined in UMLS that are directly related to the psychiatric diagnoses present in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) ontology. Random Forests provides a generalization of the extracted, case-specific features in our representation. The best variant presented here scored an inverse mean absolute error (MAE) of 80.64%. A concise concept-based representation, paired with identification of concept certainty and scope (family, patient), shows a robust performance on the task.

摘要

CEGS N-GRID 2016 共享任务(Filannino 等人,2017)在临床自然语言处理中,根据精神科入院报告,为精神症状分配严重程度评分。我们提出了一种方法,该方法利用报告固有的类似访谈的结构,从报告中提取相关信息并生成表示。表示由一组受限的精神科概念(及其出现的上下文)组成,这些概念是使用与精神障碍诊断与统计手册第 4 版(DSM-IV)本体中存在的精神科诊断直接相关的 UMLS 中定义的医学概念识别的。随机森林为我们表示中提取的特定于病例的特征提供了泛化。这里呈现的最佳变体的逆平均绝对误差(MAE)为 80.64%。简洁的基于概念的表示,结合概念确定性和范围(家族、患者)的识别,在该任务上表现出稳健的性能。

相似文献

1
Counting trees in Random Forests: Predicting symptom severity in psychiatric intake reports.随机森林中的树木计数:预测精神病学入院报告中的症状严重程度。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Nov;75S:S112-S119. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
2
Automatic recognition of symptom severity from psychiatric evaluation records.从精神科评估记录中自动识别症状严重程度。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Nov;75S:S71-S84. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 May 30.
3
Symptom severity prediction from neuropsychiatric clinical records: Overview of 2016 CEGS N-GRID shared tasks Track 2.从神经精神临床记录中预测症状严重程度:2016 年 CEGS N-GRID 共享任务第 2 轨道概述。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Nov;75S:S62-S70. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
4
Predictive modeling for classification of positive valence system symptom severity from initial psychiatric evaluation records.从初始精神评估记录中预测积极情绪系统症状严重程度的分类模型。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Nov;75S:S94-S104. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.05.019. Epub 2017 May 29.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Ordinal convolutional neural networks for predicting RDoC positive valence psychiatric symptom severity scores.用于预测 RDoC 正性情绪症状严重程度评分的序贯卷积神经网络。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Nov;75S:S85-S93. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 May 12.
7
A hybrid approach to automatic de-identification of psychiatric notes.一种混合方法,用于自动识别精神科病历中的身份信息。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Nov;75S:S19-S27. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
8
Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.给编辑的信:《ICD-11 与 DSM-5 心境障碍分类的趋同与分歧》
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):293-295. doi: 10.5080/u26899.
9
Medical subdomain classification of clinical notes using a machine learning-based natural language processing approach.基于机器学习的自然语言处理方法对临床笔记进行医学子域分类。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Dec 1;17(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0556-8.
10
Psychiatric symptom recognition without labeled data using distributional representations of phrases and on-line knowledge.使用短语的分布表示和在线知识进行无标记数据的精神症状识别。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Nov;75S:S129-S137. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling the Determinants of Subjective Well-Being in Schizophrenia.精神分裂症主观幸福感决定因素的建模
Schizophr Bull. 2025 Jul 7;51(4):1118-1133. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae156.
2
Enhancing post-traumatic stress disorder patient assessment: leveraging natural language processing for research of domain criteria identification using electronic medical records.利用自然语言处理技术从电子病历中研究领域标准识别,以增强创伤后应激障碍患者评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Jun 4;24(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02554-8.
3
Descriptive forest: experiments on a novel tree-structure-generalization method for describing cardiovascular diseases.描述性森林:一种新颖的树结构泛化方法在描述心血管疾病中的实验。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jul 28;23(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02228-x.
4
Informatics Research on Mental Health Functioning: Decision Support for the Social Security Administration Disability Program.心理健康功能信息学研究:社会保障署残障计划的决策支持。
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Jan 1;74(1):56-62. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202200056. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
5
Entropy-based discrimination between translated Chinese and original Chinese using data mining techniques.基于数据挖掘技术的翻译中文与原文中文的熵判别。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0265633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265633. eCollection 2022.
6
Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing in Mental Health: Systematic Review.机器学习和自然语言处理在心理健康中的应用:系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 4;23(5):e15708. doi: 10.2196/15708.
7
Clinical Text Data in Machine Learning: Systematic Review.机器学习中的临床文本数据:系统综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Mar 31;8(3):e17984. doi: 10.2196/17984.
8
Use of machine-learning algorithms to determine features of systolic blood pressure variability that predict poor outcomes in hypertensive patients.使用机器学习算法来确定收缩压变异性的特征,这些特征可预测高血压患者的不良预后。
Clin Kidney J. 2018 Jul 3;12(2):206-212. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfy049. eCollection 2019 Apr.
9
Assessing the severity of positive valence symptoms in initial psychiatric evaluation records: Should we use convolutional neural networks?评估初始精神评估记录中积极效价症状的严重程度:我们是否应该使用卷积神经网络?
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 16;13(10):e0204493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204493. eCollection 2018.
10
A natural language processing challenge for clinical records: Research Domains Criteria (RDoC) for psychiatry.临床记录面临的自然语言处理挑战:精神病学的研究领域标准(RDoC)
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Nov;75S:S1-S3. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Symptom severity prediction from neuropsychiatric clinical records: Overview of 2016 CEGS N-GRID shared tasks Track 2.从神经精神临床记录中预测症状严重程度:2016 年 CEGS N-GRID 共享任务第 2 轨道概述。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Nov;75S:S62-S70. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
2
Improving a full-text search engine: the importance of negation detection and family history context to identify cases in a biomedical data warehouse.改进全文搜索引擎:否定检测和家族病史背景对在生物医学数据仓库中识别病例的重要性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 May 1;24(3):607-613. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw144.
3
Data integration of structured and unstructured sources for assigning clinical codes to patient stays.用于为患者住院分配临床代码的结构化和非结构化数据源的数据整合。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Apr;23(e1):e11-9. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv115. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
4
Identifying risk factors for heart disease over time: Overview of 2014 i2b2/UTHealth shared task Track 2.随着时间推移识别心脏病的风险因素:2014年i2b2/德克萨斯大学健康科学中心共享任务第2轨道概述
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Dec;58 Suppl(Suppl):S67-S77. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
5
The role of fine-grained annotations in supervised recognition of risk factors for heart disease from EHRs.细粒度注释在基于电子健康记录的心脏病风险因素监督识别中的作用。
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Dec;58 Suppl(Suppl):S111-S119. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.06.010. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
6
Evaluating the state of the art in disorder recognition and normalization of the clinical narrative.评估临床病历中疾病识别和规范化的当前技术水平。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jan;22(1):143-54. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002544. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
7
Automatic identification of heart failure diagnostic criteria, using text analysis of clinical notes from electronic health records.利用电子健康记录中的临床记录进行文本分析,自动识别心力衰竭诊断标准。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Dec;83(12):983-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
8
Enhancing clinical concept extraction with distributional semantics.利用分布语义增强临床概念提取。
J Biomed Inform. 2012 Feb;45(1):129-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.10.007. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
9
Text mining for the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System: medical text classification using informative feature selection.疫苗不良事件报告系统的文本挖掘:使用信息特征选择的医学文本分类。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):631-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000022. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
10
2010 i2b2/VA challenge on concepts, assertions, and relations in clinical text.2010 i2b2/VA 挑战赛:临床文本中的概念、断言和关系
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):552-6. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000203. Epub 2011 Jun 16.