• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习算法来确定收缩压变异性的特征,这些特征可预测高血压患者的不良预后。

Use of machine-learning algorithms to determine features of systolic blood pressure variability that predict poor outcomes in hypertensive patients.

作者信息

Lacson Ronilda C, Baker Bowen, Suresh Harini, Andriole Katherine, Szolovits Peter, Lacson Eduardo

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston MA, USA.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Kidney J. 2018 Jul 3;12(2):206-212. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfy049. eCollection 2019 Apr.

DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfy049
PMID:30976397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6452173/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We re-analyzed data from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) trial to identify features of systolic blood pressure (SBP) variability that portend poor cardiovascular outcomes using a nonlinear machine-learning algorithm.

METHODS

We included all patients who completed 1 year of the study without reaching any primary endpoint during the first year, specifically: myocardial infarction, other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, heart failure or death from a cardiovascular event ( = 8799; 94%). In addition to clinical variables, features representing longitudinal SBP trends and variability were determined and combined in a random forest algorithm, optimized using cross-validation, using 70% of patients in the training set. Area under the curve (AUC) was measured using a 30% testing set. Finally, feature importance was determined by minimizing node impurity averaging over all trees in the forest for a specific feature.

RESULTS

A total of 365 patients (4.1%) reached the combined primary outcome over 37 months of follow-up. The random forest classifier had an AUC of 0.71 on the testing set. The 10 most significant features selected in order of importance by the automated algorithm included the urine albumin/creatinine (CR) ratio, estimated glomerular filtration rate, age, serum CR, history of subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD), cholesterol, a variable representing SBP signals using wavelet transformation, high-density lipoprotein, the 90th percentile of SBP and triglyceride level.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully demonstrated use of random forest algorithm to define best prognostic longitudinal SBP representations. In addition to known risk factors for CVD, transformed variables for time series SBP measurements were found to be important in predicting poor cardiovascular outcomes and require further evaluation.

摘要

背景

我们重新分析了收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)的数据,以使用非线性机器学习算法识别预示心血管不良结局的收缩压(SBP)变异性特征。

方法

我们纳入了所有在第一年完成研究且未达到任何主要终点的患者,具体为:心肌梗死、其他急性冠状动脉综合征、中风、心力衰竭或心血管事件导致的死亡(n = 8799;94%)。除临床变量外,确定了代表纵向SBP趋势和变异性的特征,并将其组合到随机森林算法中,使用训练集中70%的患者进行交叉验证优化。使用30%的测试集测量曲线下面积(AUC)。最后,通过最小化森林中所有树的特定特征的节点杂质平均值来确定特征重要性。

结果

在37个月的随访中,共有365例患者(4.1%)达到联合主要结局。随机森林分类器在测试集上的AUC为0.71。自动算法按重要性顺序选择的10个最重要特征包括尿白蛋白/肌酐(CR)比值、估计肾小球滤过率、年龄、血清CR、亚临床心血管疾病(CVD)病史、胆固醇、使用小波变换表示SBP信号的变量、高密度脂蛋白、SBP的第90百分位数和甘油三酯水平。

结论

我们成功证明了使用随机森林算法来定义最佳预后纵向SBP表现。除了已知的CVD危险因素外,发现时间序列SBP测量的转换变量在预测不良心血管结局方面很重要,需要进一步评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ba2/6452173/5431cac352cc/sfy049f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ba2/6452173/bbe0086da58f/sfy049f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ba2/6452173/d3a2c27b291a/sfy049f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ba2/6452173/5431cac352cc/sfy049f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ba2/6452173/bbe0086da58f/sfy049f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ba2/6452173/d3a2c27b291a/sfy049f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ba2/6452173/5431cac352cc/sfy049f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of machine-learning algorithms to determine features of systolic blood pressure variability that predict poor outcomes in hypertensive patients.使用机器学习算法来确定收缩压变异性的特征,这些特征可预测高血压患者的不良预后。
Clin Kidney J. 2018 Jul 3;12(2):206-212. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfy049. eCollection 2019 Apr.
2
Machine learning algorithms identify hypokalaemia risk in people with hypertension in the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2018.机器学习算法在美国国家健康与营养调查 1999-2018 中识别出高血压人群中的低钾血症风险。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):2209336. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2209336.
3
Outcomes in adults with systolic blood pressure between 130 and 139 mmHg in Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure trial and Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.在 ACTION 研究和 SBP 干预试验中,收缩压在 130 至 139mmHg 的成年人的结局。
J Hypertens. 2020 Aug;38(8):1567-1577. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002437.
4
Treatment of Hypertension: Which Goal for Which Patient?高血压的治疗:针对不同患者应设定何种目标?
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;956:117-127. doi: 10.1007/5584_2016_97.
5
Prediction for cardiovascular diseases based on laboratory data: An analysis of random forest model.基于实验室数据的心血管疾病预测:随机森林模型分析。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2020 Sep;34(9):e23421. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23421. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
6
Applicability and cost-effectiveness of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) in the Chinese population: A cost-effectiveness modeling study.在中国人群中开展收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)的适用性和成本效益:一项成本效益建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2021 Mar 4;18(3):e1003515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003515. eCollection 2021 Mar.
7
Assessment of Risk of Harm Associated With Intensive Blood Pressure Management Among Patients With Hypertension Who Smoke: A Secondary Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.高血压患者强化血压管理相关伤害风险评估:收缩压干预试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190005. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0005.
8
Prognostic interactions between cardiovascular risk factors.心血管危险因素之间的预后相互作用。
Dan Med J. 2014 Jul;61(7):B4892.
9
Influence of baseline systolic blood pressure on the relationship between intensive blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).强化血压控制与心血管结局试验(SPRINT)中基线收缩压对血压控制与心血管结局关系的影响。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2019 Mar;108(3):273-281. doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1353-9. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
10
Achieved diastolic blood pressure and pulse pressure at target systolic blood pressure (120-140 mmHg) and cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients: results from ONTARGET and TRANSCEND trials.在高危患者中实现了目标收缩压(120-140mmHg)下的舒张压和脉压,并取得了心血管结局:ONTARGET 和 TRANSCEND 试验的结果。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3105-3114. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy287.

引用本文的文献

1
Physiological measures variability and risks of heart disease and stroke: evidence from three cohort studies.生理指标变异性与心脏病和中风风险:来自三项队列研究的证据。
BMC Med. 2024 Dec 18;22(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03805-1.
2
Application of artificial intelligence in hypertension.人工智能在高血压中的应用。
Clin Hypertens. 2024 May 1;30(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40885-024-00266-9.
3
Combating hypertension beyond genome-wide association studies: Microbiome and artificial intelligence as opportunities for precision medicine.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine Learning and Prediction in Medicine - Beyond the Peak of Inflated Expectations.医学中的机器学习与预测——超越过高期望的顶峰
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 29;376(26):2507-2509. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1702071.
2
An Integrative Approach for Identifying Network Biomarkers of Breast Cancer Subtypes Using Genomic, Interactomic, and Transcriptomic Data.一种使用基因组、相互作用组和转录组数据识别乳腺癌亚型网络生物标志物的综合方法。
J Comput Biol. 2017 Aug;24(8):756-766. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2017.0010. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
3
The J-shaped Curve for Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Historical Context and Recent Updates.
超越全基因组关联研究对抗高血压:微生物组与人工智能作为精准医学的机遇
Camb Prism Precis Med. 2023 May 16;1:e26. doi: 10.1017/pcm.2023.13. eCollection 2023.
4
Artificial intelligence in the risk prediction models of cardiovascular disease and development of an independent validation screening tool: a systematic review.人工智能在心血管疾病风险预测模型中的应用及独立验证筛选工具的开发:系统评价。
BMC Med. 2024 Feb 5;22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03273-7.
5
Longitudinal machine learning model for predicting systolic blood pressure in patients with heart failure.心力衰竭患者收缩压的纵向机器学习预测模型。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2023 Aug 1;64(2):E226-E231. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.2.2887. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
Survey and Evaluation of Hypertension Machine Learning Research.高血压机器学习研究的调查与评估。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 May 2;12(9):e027896. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027896. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
7
Workplace Predictors of Violence against Nurses Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Cross-Sectional Study Utilizing the National Standard of Psychological Workplace Health and Safety.使用机器学习技术预测针对护士的工作场所暴力行为:一项采用国家工作场所心理健康与安全标准的横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 1;11(7):1008. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11071008.
8
A Systematic Review of Time Series Classification Techniques Used in Biomedical Applications.用于生物医学应用的时间序列分类技术的系统评价
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Oct 20;22(20):8016. doi: 10.3390/s22208016.
9
Interpretable classifiers for prediction of disability trajectories using a nationwide longitudinal database.使用全国性纵向数据库预测残疾轨迹的可解释分类器。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jul 28;22(1):627. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03295-x.
10
Prediction of Masked Hypertension and Masked Uncontrolled Hypertension Using Machine Learning.使用机器学习预测隐匿性高血压和隐匿性未控制高血压
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Nov 19;8:778306. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.778306. eCollection 2021.
血压与心血管疾病风险的J形曲线:历史背景与近期进展
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017 Aug;19(8):34. doi: 10.1007/s11883-017-0670-1.
4
Counting trees in Random Forests: Predicting symptom severity in psychiatric intake reports.随机森林中的树木计数:预测精神病学入院报告中的症状严重程度。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Nov;75S:S112-S119. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
5
Prognostic Value of Variability in Systolic Blood Pressure Related to Vascular Events and Premature Death in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The ADVANCE-ON Study.2 型糖尿病患者收缩压变异性与血管事件及过早死亡的相关性及其预后价值: ADVANCE-ON 研究。
Hypertension. 2017 Aug;70(2):461-468. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09359. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
6
Artificial Intelligence in Precision Cardiovascular Medicine.人工智能在精准心血管医学中的应用。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 30;69(21):2657-2664. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.571.
7
Machine Learning for Predicting Outcomes in Trauma.机器学习在创伤预后预测中的应用。
Shock. 2017 Nov;48(5):504-510. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000898.
8
EEG-Based Computer Aided Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder Using Wavelet, Entropy, and ANN.基于脑电图的自闭症谱系障碍的小波、熵和人工神经网络计算机辅助诊断
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9816591. doi: 10.1155/2017/9816591. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
9
Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.血压变异性与心血管疾病:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ. 2016 Aug 9;354:i4098. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4098.
10
A Multivariate Timeseries Modeling Approach to Severity of Illness Assessment and Forecasting in ICU with Sparse, Heterogeneous Clinical Data.一种利用稀疏、异构临床数据对重症监护病房(ICU)疾病严重程度进行评估和预测的多变量时间序列建模方法。
Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell. 2015 Jan;2015:446-453.