• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Thresholds for Oxford Knee Score after total knee replacement surgery: a novel approach to post-operative evaluation.全膝关节置换术后牛津膝关节评分阈值:一种术后评估的新方法。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Jun 12;12(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0592-1.
2
Thresholds for the Oxford Hip Score after total hip replacement surgery: a novel approach to postoperative evaluation.全髋关节置换术后牛津髋关节评分的阈值:一种术后评估的新方法。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Dec;18(4):401-406. doi: 10.1007/s10195-017-0465-8. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
3
The Arthroplasty Candidacy Help Engine tool to select candidates for hip and knee replacement surgery: development and economic modelling.人工关节置换候选帮助引擎工具选择髋关节和膝关节置换手术的候选者:开发和经济建模。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jun;23(32):1-216. doi: 10.3310/hta23320.
4
Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS): thresholds for the EQ-5D-5L and Oxford hip and knee scores for patients with total hip and knee replacement.患者可接受症状状态 (PASS):全髋关节和膝关节置换患者的 EQ-5D-5L 和牛津髋关节和膝关节评分的阈值。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Feb;32(2):519-530. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03287-9. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
5
Assessing patients for joint replacement: can pre-operative Oxford hip and knee scores be used to predict patient satisfaction following joint replacement surgery and to guide patient selection?评估患者是否适合关节置换:术前牛津髋关节和膝关节评分能否用于预测关节置换术后的患者满意度并指导患者选择?
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Dec;93(12):1660-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B12.27046.
6
Poor Knee-specific and Generic Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores at 6 Months Are Associated With Early Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.膝关节特异性和通用型患者报告结局测量评分在 6 个月时较差与早期翻修膝关节置换术相关:来自澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处的一项研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Oct 1;480(10):1899-1909. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002301. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
7
Associations between preoperative Oxford hip and knee scores and costs and quality of life of patients undergoing primary total joint replacement in the NHS England: an observational study.英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中初次全关节置换患者术前牛津髋关节与膝关节评分与费用及生活质量的关联:一项观察性研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 10;8(4):e019477. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019477.
8
Oxford Knee Score and EQ-5d poorly predict patient's satisfaction following mechanically aligned total knee replacement: A cross-sectional study.牛津膝关节评分和 EQ-5d 对机械对线全膝关节置换术后患者满意度的预测效果不佳:一项横断面研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 May;107(3):102867. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102867. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
9
Diabetes does not influence the early outcome of total knee replacement: a prospective study assessing the Oxford knee score, short form 12, and patient satisfaction.糖尿病不影响全膝关节置换的早期疗效:一项评估牛津膝关节评分、简明健康状况调查简表12及患者满意度的前瞻性研究。
Knee. 2013 Dec;20(6):437-41. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
10
Geographical Variation in Outcomes of Primary Hip and Knee Replacement.髋膝关节初次置换术后结局的地域差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1914325. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14325.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of total knee arthroplasty on functional outcomes and mental health: A prospective study.全膝关节置换术对功能结局和心理健康的影响:一项前瞻性研究。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jul 18;12(3):e70314. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70314. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Application of the Oxford Arthroplasty Early Recovery Score for patients undergoing Joint arthroplasty.牛津关节置换早期恢复评分在接受关节置换术患者中的应用。
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jan 15;17(1):338-348. doi: 10.62347/YMBI7245. eCollection 2025.
3
Early Outcome of Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Through the Oxford Knee Score in a Developing Country: A Prospective Cohort.通过牛津膝关节评分评估发展中国家同期双侧全膝关节置换术的早期疗效:一项前瞻性队列研究
Cureus. 2024 Jul 28;16(7):e65563. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65563. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Is Posterior Cruciate Ligament Needle Pie-Crusting Safe and Effective in Balancing Cruciate-Retained Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Comparative Study.后交叉韧带针刺松解术在保留交叉韧带的全膝关节置换术中平衡膝关节是否安全有效?一项比较研究。
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Nov 20;24:101277. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101277. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Clinical Outcome Comparison between Staged -Bilateral Versus Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Replacements.分期双侧与同期双侧全膝关节置换术的临床结果比较
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021 Nov;9(6):641-646. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2021.48053.2379.
6
Outcomes of Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty in Indian Population-Case Series with Three Year Clinical Results.印度人群中运动学对齐全膝关节置换术的结果——三年临床结果的病例系列
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Sep 18;55(5):1118-1126. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00521-3. eCollection 2021 Oct.
7
Which Oxford Knee Score level represents a satisfactory symptom state after undergoing a total knee replacement?牛津膝关节评分的哪个等级代表全膝关节置换术后令人满意的症状状态?
Acta Orthop. 2021 Feb;92(1):85-90. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1832304. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
8
Post-arthroscopic osteonecrosis of the knee: A case report and literature review.关节镜术后膝关节骨坏死:一例报告及文献综述
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Oct;20(4):3009-3016. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9056. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
9
Threshold scores for treatment success after arthroscopic bankart repair using Oxford Shoulder Instability Score, Constant-Murley Score, and UCLA shoulder score.使用牛津肩部不稳定评分、Constant-Murley评分和加州大学洛杉矶分校肩部评分评估关节镜下Bankart修复术后治疗成功的阈值分数。
J Orthop. 2020 May 7;22:242-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.05.001. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery.关节置换手术后牛津髋关节和膝关节评分的有意义变化。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;68(1):73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
2
A novel methodological approach for measuring symptomatic change following total joint arthroplasty.一种用于测量全关节置换术后症状变化的新型方法。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Nov;29(11):2140-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
3
Patient acceptable symptom states after totalhip or knee replacement at mid-term follow-up: Thresholds of the Oxford hip and knee scores.中期随访全髋关节或膝关节置换术后患者可接受的症状状态:牛津髋关节和膝关节评分的阈值。
Bone Joint Res. 2014 Jan 13;3(1):7-13. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.31.2000141. Print 2014.
4
Minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients 1 year postoperatively.全髋关节置换术(THA)患者术后 1 年的最小临床重要改善(MCII)和可接受的患者症状状态(PASS)。
Acta Orthop. 2014 Feb;85(1):39-48. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.867782. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
5
What is the optimal time point to assess patient-reported recovery after hip and knee replacement? A systematic review and analysis of routinely reported outcome data from the English patient-reported outcome measures programme.评估髋关节和膝关节置换术后患者报告的康复的最佳时间点是什么?来自英国患者报告结局测量计划的常规报告结局数据的系统回顾和分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Jul 30;11:128. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-128.
6
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish version of the Oxford hip score: Assessed against generic and disease-specific questionnaires.丹麦版牛津髋关节评分的翻译、跨文化适应性和验证:与通用和疾病特异性问卷进行评估。
Bone Joint Res. 2012 Sep 1;1(9):225-33. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.19.2000076. Print 2012 Sep.
7
Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes for hip and knee replacement surgery: identification of thresholds associated with satisfaction with surgery.髋关节和膝关节置换手术患者报告结局的解读:确定与手术满意度相关的阈值
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Mar;94(3):412-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B3.27425.
8
The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores.牛津髋关节和膝关节评分的应用。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Aug;89(8):1010-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19424.
9
Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods.理解最小临床重要差异:概念与方法综述
Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):541-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.008. Epub 2007 Apr 2.
10
Predicting total knee replacement pain: a prospective, observational study.预测全膝关节置换术后疼痛:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Nov(416):27-36. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000092983.12414.e9.

全膝关节置换术后牛津膝关节评分阈值:一种术后评估的新方法。

Thresholds for Oxford Knee Score after total knee replacement surgery: a novel approach to post-operative evaluation.

作者信息

Petersen Christian Lund, Kjærsgaard Jonas Bruun, Kjærgaard Nicolai, Jensen Michael Ulrich, Laursen Mogens Berg

机构信息

School of Medicine and Health, Aalborg University, Niels Jernes Vej 12 A5, 9220, Aalborg Ø, Denmark.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Jun 12;12(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0592-1.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-017-0592-1
PMID:28606159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5469178/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In a prospective cohort study, we wanted to detect thresholds distinguishing between patients with a satisfactory and an unsatisfactory outcome after total knee replacement (TKR) based on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), namely the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), using patient satisfaction and patient-perceived function as global transition items.

METHODS

Seventy-three TKR patients completed the OKS questionnaire before surgery and were invited to complete the same questionnaire again 6 (4 to 9) months after surgery. Correlations between outcome measures and anchors were calculated using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Thresholds were established by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, using multiple anchor-based approaches.

RESULTS

Patients showed a mean increase of 16.5 (SD 9.5) in OKS following TKR. Significant positive correlations were found between outcome measures and anchors. Six different thresholds were determined for outcome measures coupled with satisfaction, patient-perceived function and a combination thereof using a cut-off of 50 and 70.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has established a set of clinically meaningful thresholds for Oxford Knee scores that may help to detect TKR patients who might be in need of post-operative evaluation.

摘要

背景

在一项前瞻性队列研究中,我们希望基于患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs),即牛津膝关节评分(OKS),以患者满意度和患者感知功能作为整体转变项目,检测全膝关节置换术(TKR)后结局满意和不满意的患者之间的分界点。

方法

73例TKR患者在手术前完成了OKS问卷,并被邀请在术后6(4至9)个月再次完成相同问卷。使用Pearson相关系数计算结局测量指标与锚定指标之间的相关性。采用多种基于锚定的方法,通过受试者工作特征(ROC)分析确定分界点。

结果

TKR后患者的OKS平均增加了16.5(标准差9.5)。在结局测量指标与锚定指标之间发现了显著的正相关。使用截断值50和70,针对与满意度、患者感知功能及其组合相关的结局测量指标确定了六个不同的分界点。

结论

本研究为牛津膝关节评分建立了一组具有临床意义的分界点,这可能有助于检测可能需要术后评估的TKR患者。