Stein Marion, Auerswald Max, Ebersbach Mirjam
Department of Psychology, University of KasselKassel, Germany.
Department of Quantitative Methods in Psychology, Ulm UniversityUlm, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2017 May 30;8:859. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00859. eCollection 2017.
There is growing evidence indicating positive, causal effects of acute physical activity on cognitive performance of school children, adolescents, and adults. However, only a few studies examined these effects in kindergartners, even though correlational studies suggest moderate relationships between motor and cognitive functions in this age group. One aim of the present study was to examine the correlational relationships between motor and executive functions among 5- to 6-year-olds. Another aim was to test whether an acute coordinative intervention, which was adapted to the individual motor functions of the children, causally affected different executive functions (i.e., motor inhibition, cognitive inhibition, and shifting). Kindergartners ( = 102) were randomly assigned either to a coordinative intervention (20 min) or to a control condition (20 min). The coordination group performed five bimanual exercises (e.g., throwing/kicking balls onto targets with the right and left hand/foot), whereas the control group took part in five simple activities that hardly involved coordination skills (e.g., stamping). Children's motor functions were assessed with the Movement Assessment Battery for Children 2 (Petermann, 2009) in a pre-test (T1), 1 week before the intervention took place. Motor inhibition was assessed with the Simon says task (Carlson and Wang, 2007), inhibition and shifting were assessed with the Hearts and Flowers task (Davidson et al., 2006) in the pre-test and again in a post-test (T2) immediately after the interventions. Results revealed significant correlations between motor functions and executive functions (especially shifting) at T1. There was no overall effect of the intervention. However, explorative analyses indicated a three-way interaction, with the intervention leading to accuracy gains only in the motor inhibition task and only if it was tested directly after the intervention. As an unexpected effect, this result needs to be treated with caution but may indicate that the effect of acute coordinative exercise is temporally limited and emerges only for motor inhibition, but not for cognitive inhibition or shifting. More generally, in contrast to other studies including older participants and endurance exercises, no general effect of an acute coordinative intervention on executive functions was revealed for kindergartners.
越来越多的证据表明,急性体育活动对学童、青少年和成年人的认知表现具有积极的因果效应。然而,尽管相关性研究表明该年龄组的运动功能和认知功能之间存在适度的关系,但只有少数研究考察了幼儿园儿童的这些效应。本研究的一个目的是考察5至6岁儿童运动功能与执行功能之间的相关关系。另一个目的是测试一种根据儿童个体运动功能调整的急性协调干预是否会对不同的执行功能(即运动抑制、认知抑制和转换)产生因果影响。幼儿园儿童(n = 102)被随机分配到协调干预组(20分钟)或对照组(20分钟)。协调组进行了五项双手练习(例如,用右手和左手/脚将球投掷/踢向目标),而对照组则参与了五项几乎不涉及协调技能的简单活动(例如,跺脚)。在干预前1周的预测试(T1)中,使用儿童运动评估量表第二版(彼得曼,2009)评估儿童的运动功能。在预测试中使用西蒙说任务(卡尔森和王,2007)评估运动抑制,在预测试和干预后立即进行的后测试(T2)中使用红心与花朵任务(戴维森等人,2006)评估抑制和转换。结果显示,在T1时运动功能与执行功能(尤其是转换)之间存在显著相关性。干预没有总体效果。然而,探索性分析表明存在三因素交互作用,即干预仅在运动抑制任务中导致准确性提高,且仅在干预后直接进行测试时才会如此。作为一个意外的结果,这一结果需要谨慎对待,但可能表明急性协调运动的效果在时间上是有限制的,并且仅在运动抑制方面出现,而在认知抑制或转换方面则没有出现。更普遍地说,与其他包括年龄较大参与者和耐力运动的研究相比,未发现急性协调干预对幼儿园儿童的执行功能有总体影响。