Justino Allisson Benatti, Teixeira Renata Roland, Peixoto Leonardo Gomes, Jaramillo Olga Lucia Bocanegra, Espindola Foued Salmen
a Institute of Genetics and Biochemistry , Federal University of Uberlandia , Uberlândia , MG , Brazil.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2017 Oct;77(6):415-422. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2017.1334261. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of unstimulated and stimulated saliva collection methods, as well as tooth brushing, on the secretion rate of salivary total protein, nitrite, total antioxidant capacity and alpha-amylase. Saliva of 14 healthy individuals were collected with stimulation using Salivette, Parafilm and chewing gum and without stimulation from spit with and without fluid accumulation, before and after oral hygiene. Total protein, nitrite, total antioxidant capacity and alpha-amylase concentration (sAA) were evaluated. The collection of saliva stimulated with Parafilm and chewing gum increased the salivary flow (1.5 ± 0.4 and 3.4 ± 0.7 mL/min, respectively) and the secretion rate of salivary total protein (1.0 ± 0.2 and 2.3 ± 0.5 mg/min, respectively). Also, chewing gum increases the salivary nitrite secretion (213 ± 58 nmol/min) and total antioxidant capacity (410 ± 47 nmol trolox eq/min). Interestingly, the unstimulated method without saliva accumulation prior to collection resulted in low sAA levels (23,531 ± 7979 pixel density). Furthermore, oral hygiene decreased salivary flow (1.3 ± 0.5 to 1.0 ± 0.4 mL/min), reduced the secretion rate of total protein (1.0 ± 0.5 to 0.6 ± 0.2 mg/min, p < .05) and increased sAA (13,159 ± 7114 to 20,075 ± 25,656 pixel density, p < .05). The type of stimulation can activate autonomous receptors responsible for the secretion and composition of saliva. Therefore, the evaluation of saliva collection methods and oral hygiene on salivary biomarkers is important for understanding and standardizing variations in salivary composition to strengthen the use of saliva as a diagnostic fluid.
本研究的目的是评估未刺激和刺激唾液采集方法以及刷牙对唾液总蛋白、亚硝酸盐、总抗氧化能力和α-淀粉酶分泌率的影响。在口腔卫生前后,使用Salivette、Parafilm和口香糖刺激采集了14名健康个体的唾液,同时也采集了未刺激的唾液(有和没有积液的吐口水方式)。评估了总蛋白、亚硝酸盐、总抗氧化能力和α-淀粉酶浓度(sAA)。用Parafilm和口香糖刺激采集唾液增加了唾液流量(分别为1.5±0.4和3.4±0.7 mL/min)以及唾液总蛋白的分泌率(分别为1.0±0.2和2.3±0.5 mg/min)。此外,嚼口香糖增加了唾液亚硝酸盐分泌(213±58 nmol/min)和总抗氧化能力(410±47 nmol Trolox当量/min)。有趣的是,采集前无唾液积聚的未刺激方法导致sAA水平较低(23,531±7,979像素密度)。此外,口腔卫生使唾液流量降低(从1.3±0.5降至1.0±0.4 mL/min),总蛋白分泌率降低(从1.0±0.5降至0.6±0.2 mg/min,p<0.05),sAA增加(从13,159±7,114增至20,075±25,656像素密度,p<0.05)。刺激类型可激活负责唾液分泌和成分的自主受体。因此,评估唾液采集方法和口腔卫生对唾液生物标志物的影响对于理解和规范唾液成分变化以加强唾液作为诊断液的应用很重要。