Nygaard Egil, Johansen Venke A, Siqveland Johan, Hussain Ajmal, Heir Trond
Department of Psychology, University of OsloOslo, Norway.
Resource Centre on Violence, Traumatic Stress and Suicide Prevention, Western Norway (RVTS West), Haukeland University HospitalBergen, Norway.
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 1;8:913. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00913. eCollection 2017.
Self-efficacy is assumed to promote posttraumatic adaption, and several cross-sectional studies support this notion. However, there is a lack of prospective longitudinal studies to further illuminate the temporal relationship between self-efficacy and posttraumatic stress symptoms. Thus, an important unresolved research question is whether posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms affect the level of self-efficacy or vice versa or whether they mutually influence each other. The present prospective longitudinal study investigated the reciprocal relationship between general self-efficacy (GSE) and posttraumatic stress symptoms in 143 physical assault victims. We used an autoregressive cross-lagged model across four assessment waves: within 4 months after the assault (T1) and then 3 months (T2), 12 months (T3) and 8 years (T4) after the first assessment. Stress symptoms at T1 and T2 predicted subsequent self-efficacy, while self-efficacy at T1 and T2 was not related to subsequent stress symptoms. These relationships were reversed after T3; higher levels of self-efficacy at T3 predicted lower levels of posttraumatic stress symptoms at T4, while posttraumatic tress symptoms at T3 did not predict self-efficacy at T4. In conclusion, posttraumatic stress symptoms may have a deteriorating effect on self-efficacy in the early phase after physical assault, whereas self-efficacy may promote recovery from posttraumatic stress symptoms over the long term.
自我效能被认为能促进创伤后的适应,多项横断面研究支持这一观点。然而,缺乏前瞻性纵向研究来进一步阐明自我效能与创伤后应激症状之间的时间关系。因此,一个重要的未解决研究问题是创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状是否会影响自我效能水平,反之亦然,或者它们是否相互影响。本前瞻性纵向研究调查了143名身体攻击受害者的一般自我效能(GSE)与创伤后应激症状之间的相互关系。我们在四个评估阶段使用了自回归交叉滞后模型:攻击后4个月内(T1),然后在首次评估后的3个月(T2)、12个月(T3)和8年(T4)。T1和T2时的应激症状预测了随后的自我效能,而T1和T2时的自我效能与随后的应激症状无关。T3之后这些关系发生了逆转;T3时较高水平的自我效能预测了T4时较低水平的创伤后应激症状,而T3时的创伤后应激症状并未预测T4时的自我效能。总之,创伤后应激症状可能在身体攻击后的早期阶段对自我效能产生恶化影响,而自我效能可能在长期内促进从创伤后应激症状中恢复。