Re: Tarazona et al. (2017): Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5.

Suppr

超能文献

作者信息

Portier Christopher J, Clausing Peter

机构信息

, Thun, Switzerland.

PAN Germany, Nernstweg 32, 22765, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Toxicol. 2017 Sep;91(9):3195-3197. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-2009-7. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00204-017-2009-7

PMID:28620672

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Re: Tarazona et al. (2017): Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5.

Arch Toxicol. 2017 Sep;91(9):3195-3197. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-2009-7. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

Response to the reply by C. J. Portier and P. Clausing, concerning our review "Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC".

Arch Toxicol. 2017 Sep;91(9):3199-3203. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-2032-8. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

Update to 'Re: Tarazona et al. (2017): glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5'.

Arch Toxicol. 2018 Mar;92(3):1341. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-2138-z. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC.草甘膦的毒性与致癌性：欧盟评估的科学依据及其与国际癌症研究机构评估差异的综述

Arch Toxicol. 2017 Aug;91(8):2723-2743. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5. Epub 2017 Apr 3.

Differences in the carcinogenic evaluation of glyphosate between the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).国际癌症研究机构（IARC）与欧洲食品安全局（EFSA）对草甘膦致癌性评估的差异。

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Aug;70(8):741-5. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-207005. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

On the International Agency for Research on Cancer classification of glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen.关于国际癌症研究机构将草甘膦归类为可能的人类致癌物。

Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018 Jan;27(1):82-87. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000289.

Pesticides and public health: an analysis of the regulatory approach to assessing the carcinogenicity of glyphosate in the European Union.农药与公共卫生：欧盟评估草甘膦致癌性的监管方法分析。

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Aug;72(8):668-672. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209776. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

Carcinogenicity of glyphosate: why is New Zealand's EPA lost in the weeds?草甘膦的致癌性：为何新西兰环境保护局深陷困境？

N Z Med J. 2018 Mar 23;131(1472):82-89.

The mouse carcinogenicity study is no longer a scientifically justifiable core data requirement for the safety assessment of pesticides.鼠致癌性研究不再是农药安全性评估的科学合理核心数据要求。

Crit Rev Toxicol. 2010 Jan;40(1):35-49. doi: 10.3109/10408440903367741.

Advancing the 3Rs in regulatory toxicology - Carcinogenicity testing: Scope for harmonisation and advancing the 3Rs in regulated sectors of the European Union.推进监管毒理学中的3R原则——致癌性测试：欧盟受监管领域的协调范围及推进3R原则

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Jul;69(2):234-42. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

Effect of zinc supplementation on immunotoxicity induced by subchronic oral exposure to glyphosate-based herbicide (GOBARA®) in Wistar rats.锌补充剂对 Wistar 大鼠亚慢性经口暴露于草甘膦基除草剂（GOBARA®）引起的免疫毒性的影响。

J Int Med Res. 2023 Jan;51(1):3000605221147188. doi: 10.1177/03000605221147188.

Cytotoxic effects of Roundup Classic and its components on NE-4C and MC3T3-E1 cell lines determined by biochemical and flow cytometric assays.通过生化和流式细胞术检测方法确定农达经典款及其成分对NE - 4C和MC3T3 - E1细胞系的细胞毒性作用。

Toxicol Rep. 2022 Apr 20;9:914-926. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2022.04.014. eCollection 2022.

Recent trends in water analysis triggering future monitoring of organic micropollutants.近年来，水质分析的发展趋势促使人们对有机微量污染物进行未来监测。

Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018 Jul;410(17):3933-3941. doi: 10.1007/s00216-018-1015-9. Epub 2018 Mar 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验