• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Update to 'Re: Tarazona et al. (2017): glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5'.

作者信息

Portier Christopher J, Clausing Peter

机构信息

, Thun, Switzerland.

PAN Germany, Nernstweg 32, 22765, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Toxicol. 2018 Mar;92(3):1341. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-2138-z. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00204-017-2138-z
PMID:29230486
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Update to 'Re: Tarazona et al. (2017): glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5'.
Arch Toxicol. 2018 Mar;92(3):1341. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-2138-z. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
2
Re: Tarazona et al. (2017): Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5.
Arch Toxicol. 2017 Sep;91(9):3195-3197. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-2009-7. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
3
Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC.草甘膦的毒性与致癌性：欧盟评估的科学依据及其与国际癌症研究机构评估差异的综述
Arch Toxicol. 2017 Aug;91(8):2723-2743. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
4
Response to the reply by C. J. Portier and P. Clausing, concerning our review "Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC".
Arch Toxicol. 2017 Sep;91(9):3199-3203. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-2032-8. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
5
Genotoxicity Expert Panel review: weight of evidence evaluation of the genotoxicity of glyphosate, glyphosate-based formulations, and aminomethylphosphonic acid.遗传毒性专家小组审查：草甘膦、草甘膦基制剂和氨甲基膦酸遗传毒性的证据权重评估
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2016 Sep;46(sup1):56-74. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2016.1214680.
6
Carcinogenicity of glyphosate: why is New Zealand's EPA lost in the weeds?草甘膦的致癌性：为何新西兰环境保护局深陷困境？
N Z Med J. 2018 Mar 23;131(1472):82-89.
7
A review of the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate by four independent expert panels and comparison to the IARC assessment.四个独立专家小组对草甘膦致癌潜力的审查以及与国际癌症研究机构评估结果的比较。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2016 Sep;46(sup1):3-20. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2016.1214677.
8
Selecting the dose metric in reverse dosimetry based QIVIVE : Reply to 'Comment on 'Use of an in vitro-in silico testing strategy to predict inter-species and inter-ethnic human differences in liver toxicity of the pyrrolizidine alkaloids lasiocarpine and riddelliine' by Ning et al., Arch Toxicol doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02397-7', Arch Toxicol doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s0020 4-019-02421-w.基于反向剂量测定法的定量体外-体内外相关性研究中剂量指标的选择：对“Ning等人对‘使用体外-计算机模拟测试策略预测吡咯里西啶生物碱阔叶千里光碱和瑞德利碱肝脏毒性的种间和种族间人类差异’的评论”的回复，《毒理学文献》，doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02397-7，《毒理学文献》，doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02421-w 。
Arch Toxicol. 2019 May;93(5):1467-1469. doi: 10.1007/s00204-019-02438-1. Epub 2019 May 7.
9
10
Letter to the Editor : Comment on 'Use of an in vitro-in silico testing strategy to predict inter-species and inter-ethnic human differences in liver toxicity of the pyrrolizidine alkaloids lasiocarpine and riddelliine' by Ning et al., Arch Toxicol doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02397-7.
Arch Toxicol. 2019 May;93(5):1465-1466. doi: 10.1007/s00204-019-02421-w. Epub 2019 May 10.