Suppr超能文献

将API ZYM系统与API AN-Ident、API 20A、Minitek Anaerobe II和RapID-ANA系统用于艰难梭菌鉴定的比较。

Comparison of API ZYM system with API AN-Ident, API 20A, Minitek Anaerobe II, and RapID-ANA systems for identification of Clostridium difficile.

作者信息

Head C B, Ratnam S

机构信息

Newfoundland Public Health Laboratory, St. John's, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Jan;26(1):144-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.1.144-146.1988.

Abstract

The API ZYM system was compared with four anaerobe identification systems for the definitive identification of Clostridium difficile by using 88 cultures of C. difficile grown on Mueller-Hinton blood agar medium. The API ZYM system yielded a distinct and consistent enzyme profile for all test strains, whereas the sensitivities of the other systems in identifying C. difficile ranged from 78 to 96% (AN-Ident, 77.9%; RapID-ANA, 88.6%; Minitek Anaerobe II, 90.9%; and API 20A, 95.5%). The API ZYM system is highly reliable in identifying C. difficile accurately, is rapid, and is relatively simple to use.

摘要

使用在穆勒-欣顿血琼脂培养基上培养的88株艰难梭菌培养物,将API ZYM系统与四种厌氧菌鉴定系统进行比较,以明确鉴定艰难梭菌。API ZYM系统对所有测试菌株产生了独特且一致的酶谱,而其他系统鉴定艰难梭菌的敏感性范围为78%至96%(AN-Ident为77.9%;RapID-ANA为88.6%;Minitek Anaerobe II为90.9%;API 20A为95.5%)。API ZYM系统在准确鉴定艰难梭菌方面高度可靠,速度快且使用相对简单。

相似文献

7
Comparison of three methods for anaerobe identification.三种厌氧菌鉴定方法的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):614-21. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.614-621.1983.

引用本文的文献

1
Laboratory diagnostics of botulism.肉毒中毒的实验室诊断
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006 Apr;19(2):298-314. doi: 10.1128/CMR.19.2.298-314.2006.
2
Clostridium difficile: clinical disease and diagnosis.艰难梭菌:临床疾病与诊断
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993 Jul;6(3):251-65. doi: 10.1128/CMR.6.3.251.
4
Evaluation of AN-Ident.AN识别评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Feb;29(2):231-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.2.231-235.1991.
5
Evaluation of the An-Ident system and an indole spot test for the rapid differentiation of porcine treponemes.
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Aug;29(8):1727-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.8.1727-1729.1991.
6
New rapid identification test for Clostridium difficile.艰难梭菌新型快速鉴定试验
J Clin Pathol. 1992 Nov;45(11):956-8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.45.11.956.

本文引用的文献

1
Simple method for isolation and presumptive identification of Clostridium difficile.艰难梭菌分离与初步鉴定的简易方法
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol. 1981;250(1-2):142-6.
7
Comparison of three methods for anaerobe identification.三种厌氧菌鉴定方法的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):614-21. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.614-621.1983.
8
Preliminary investigation of Candida albicans biovars.白色念珠菌生物变种的初步调查
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Aug;18(2):430-1. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.2.430-431.1983.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验