Suppr超能文献

预测老年人生活质量简短问卷(OPQoL-Brief)得分与欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D-5L)效用值的关系。

Predicting EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utilities from Older People's Quality of Life Brief Questionnaire (OPQoL-Brief) Scores.

机构信息

Health Economics Unit, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Health Sciences Building, Bedford Park Campus, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia.

Institute for Choice, Business School, University of South Australia Business School, Way Lee Building, City West Campus, Internal Post Code: CWE-31, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Patient. 2018 Feb;11(1):39-54. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0259-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Economic evaluation of healthcare treatment and services targeted at older people requires measurement of utility-based quality-of-life outcomes but it is not always possible to collect such outcome data. It may, however, be possible to estimate these outcomes using non-utility measures of quality of life where the latter have been collected. The objective of this study was to develop a regression-based algorithm to map a non-utility-based outcome, the Older People's Quality of Life brief questionnaire (OPQoL-brief), onto a utility-based outcome, the EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L).

METHODS

The estimation sample comprised 330 community-based Australian older people (>65 years), while the validation sample consisted of 293 older people from a separate study. Six regression techniques were employed to estimate utilities from OPQoL-brief. The predictive accuracy of 54 regression models (six regression techniques × nine model specifications) was assessed using six criteria: mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), correlation, distribution of predicted utilities, distribution of residuals, and proportion of predictions with absolute errors <0.05.

RESULTS

The 54 regression models predicted EQ-5D-5L utilities that performed differently when assessed by the six criteria. However, best results were obtained from an ordinary least squares (OLS) model where all 13 OPQoL-brief items were included as continuous variables (OLS 4). RMSE and MAE estimates for this model (0.2201 and 0.1638, respectively) were within the range of published estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to predict valid utilities from OPQoL-brief using regression methods. We recommend OLS model (4) for this exercise.

摘要

背景与目的

针对老年人的医疗保健治疗和服务的经济评估需要衡量基于效用的生活质量结果,但并非总能收集到此类结果数据。然而,在已经收集了后者的情况下,可能可以使用非效用的生活质量衡量标准来估计这些结果。本研究的目的是开发一种基于回归的算法,将非效用基础的结果(老年人生活质量简表问卷(OPQoL-brief))映射到基于效用的结果(EuroQoL 5 维度 5 级(EQ-5D-5L))上。

方法

估计样本包括 330 名来自澳大利亚社区的老年人(>65 岁),而验证样本则由来自另一项研究的 293 名老年人组成。采用六种回归技术来从 OPQoL-brief 中估算效用值。使用六种标准评估了 54 个回归模型(六种回归技术×九种模型规格)的预测准确性:平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方根误差(RMSE)、相关性、预测效用的分布、残差的分布以及绝对误差<0.05 的预测比例。

结果

当根据六种标准评估时,这 54 个回归模型预测的 EQ-5D-5L 效用值表现不同。然而,最好的结果是从包含所有 13 个 OPQoL-brief 项目的普通最小二乘法(OLS)模型中获得的(OLS 4)。该模型的 RMSE 和 MAE 估计值(分别为 0.2201 和 0.1638)在已发表的估计值范围内。

结论

使用回归方法可以从 OPQoL-brief 预测有效效用值。我们建议在此类练习中使用 OLS 模型(4)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验