Druery Martha, Newcombe Peter A, Cameron Cate M, Lipman Jeffrey
Burns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.
School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 17;7(6):e017545. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017545.
The goal of burn care is that 'the quality of the outcome must be worth the pain of survival'. More research is needed to understand how best to deliver care for patients with burns to achieve this aim. Loss of independence, function as well as loss of income for patients with burns and carers cause a significant burden at both individual and societal levels. Much is being done to advance knowledge in the clinical care field; however, there has been a paucity of research exploring psychosocial outcomes. This paper describes the study background and methods, as implemented in an Australian cohort study of psychosocial outcomes after major burn injuries.
In this inception cohort study, a target sample of 230 participants, aged 18 years or over, admitted to a single statewide burns centre with a burn injury are identified by hospital staff for inclusion. Baseline survey data are collected either in person or by telephone within 28 days of the injury and participants then followed up with telephone interviews at 3, 6 and 12 months postburn. Injury and burns treatment information is collected from medical records. Social support is measured as a predictor variable using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Outcome data are collected via standardised measures in the domains of Quality of Life (SF-12, EQ-5D, BSHS-B), depression (PHQ-9), post-traumatic stress disorder (PCL-C, PAS), community integration (CIQ-R) and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (EQ-5D). Additional survey questions measure life satisfaction, return to work and public services utilisation at 12 months postinjury. Data analysis methods will include analysis of variance, Pearson correlation and hierarchical multiple regression analyses.
Hospital-based and University of Queensland Human Research Ethics Committees have approved the protocol. Results from the study will be disseminated at national and international conferences, in peer-reviewed journals and in a doctoral thesis.
Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000828426). Retrospectively registered on 23 June 2016; pre-results.
烧伤护理的目标是“结果的质量必须值得生存的痛苦”。需要更多研究来了解如何以最佳方式为烧伤患者提供护理以实现这一目标。烧伤患者及其护理人员失去独立性、功能以及收入,在个人和社会层面都造成了巨大负担。在临床护理领域,人们正在做很多工作来推进知识;然而,探索心理社会结果的研究却很少。本文描述了一项澳大利亚队列研究的背景和方法,该研究针对重度烧伤后的心理社会结果。
在这项初始队列研究中,医院工作人员确定了230名年龄在18岁及以上、因烧伤入住全州唯一烧伤中心的参与者作为目标样本纳入研究。在受伤后28天内通过面对面或电话方式收集基线调查数据,然后在烧伤后3个月、6个月和12个月对参与者进行电话随访。从医疗记录中收集损伤和烧伤治疗信息。使用多维感知社会支持量表将社会支持作为预测变量进行测量。通过生活质量(SF - 12、EQ - 5D、BSHS - B)、抑郁(PHQ - 9)、创伤后应激障碍(PCL - C、PAS)、社区融入(CIQ - R)和质量调整生命年(EQ - 5D)等领域的标准化测量收集结果数据。额外的调查问题测量受伤后12个月时的生活满意度、重返工作岗位情况和公共服务使用情况。数据分析方法将包括方差分析、Pearson相关性分析和分层多元回归分析。
基于医院和昆士兰大学人类研究伦理委员会已批准该方案。研究结果将在国内和国际会议、同行评审期刊以及博士论文中进行传播。
澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12616000828426)。于2016年6月23日追溯注册;预结果。