韩国版脊柱功能指数的信度和效度。
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the spine functional index.
作者信息
In Tae-Sung
机构信息
Department of Physical Therapy, Gimcheon University, Republic of Korea.
出版信息
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jun;29(6):1082-1084. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1082. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Spine Functional Index (K-SFI), a translated version of the original SFI used with patients with spinal disorders. [Subjects and Methods] Sixty participants with spine disorder, 22 males and 38 females, participated in the study. Reliability was determined by using the intra class correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency. Validity was examined by correlating K-SFI scores with the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Neck Disability index (NDI), and the Functional Rating Index (FRI). [Results] Test-retest reliability was 0.94. The criterion-related validity was established by comparison with the Korean version of the RMDQ, NDI and FRI. [Conclusion] The Korean version of the SFI was shown to be a reliable and valid instrument for assessing spine complaints.
摘要
[目的] 本研究旨在确立脊柱功能指数韩文版（K-SFI）的信度和效度，该版本是用于脊柱疾病患者的原始脊柱功能指数（SFI）的翻译版本。[对象与方法] 60名脊柱疾病患者参与了本研究，其中男性22名，女性38名。通过组内相关系数以及用于内部一致性的Cronbach's α系数来确定信度。通过将K-SFI得分与罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷（RMDQ）、颈部残疾指数（NDI）以及功能评定指数（FRI）进行相关性分析来检验效度。[结果] 重测信度为0.94。通过与RMDQ韩文版、NDI和FRI进行比较，确立了效标关联效度。[结论] 结果表明，SFI韩文版是评估脊柱疾病的可靠且有效的工具。
相似文献
1
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the spine functional index.韩国版脊柱功能指数的信度和效度。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jun;29(6):1082-1084. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1082. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
2
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Upper Limb Functional Index.上肢功能指数韩文版的信度和效度。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jun;29(6):1062-1065. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1062. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the spine functional index.脊柱功能指数土耳其语版本的跨文化适应、信度和效度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Feb 27;13:30. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0219-3.
4
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the foot function index for patients with foot complaints.针对足部不适患者的韩文版足部功能指数的信效度研究。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jan;29(1):53-56. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.53. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
5
Developing a shortened spine functional index (SFI-10) for patients with sub-acute/chronic spinal disorders: a cross-sectional study.开发用于亚急性/慢性脊柱疾病患者的简化脊柱功能指数（SFI-10）：一项横断面研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Mar 26;25(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07352-x.
6
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the lower limb functional index.韩国版下肢功能指数的信度和效度。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2018 Jan;30(1):50-52. doi: 10.1589/jpts.30.50. Epub 2018 Jan 27.
7
Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Persian version of the spine functional index.脊柱功能指数波斯文版的跨文化调适、效度和信度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 May 15;16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0928-5.
8
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the 10-item spine functional index (SFI-10) in the Brazilians with musculoskeletal spine disorders.翻译、跨文化调适及验证 10 项脊柱功能指数（SFI-10）在巴西有肌肉骨骼脊柱疾病患者中的应用。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Apr 5;25(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07406-0.
9
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire.日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷韩文版的信度和效度
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jul;29(7):1250-1253. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1250. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for use in low back pain.用于腰痛的罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷韩文版的跨文化调适与效度验证
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2011;24(2):83-8. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2011-0278.
引用本文的文献
1
A shortened 10-item Spine Functional Index: clinimetric properties indicate a reliable, responsive and practical measure.一个缩短版的10项脊柱功能指数：临床测量特性表明它是一种可靠、灵敏且实用的测量方法。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Apr 16;26(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08604-0.
2
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the 10-item spine functional index (SFI-10) in the Brazilians with musculoskeletal spine disorders.翻译、跨文化调适及验证 10 项脊柱功能指数（SFI-10）在巴西有肌肉骨骼脊柱疾病患者中的应用。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Apr 5;25(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07406-0.
3
Developing a shortened spine functional index (SFI-10) for patients with sub-acute/chronic spinal disorders: a cross-sectional study.开发用于亚急性/慢性脊柱疾病患者的简化脊柱功能指数（SFI-10）：一项横断面研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Mar 26;25(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07352-x.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Lithuanian version of the Spine Functional Index.脊柱功能指数立陶宛语版的跨文化调适与验证。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 13;19(3):e0299719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299719. eCollection 2024.
5
Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Persian version of the spine functional index.脊柱功能指数波斯文版的跨文化调适、效度和信度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 May 15;16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0928-5.
本文引用的文献
1
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the spine functional index.脊柱功能指数土耳其语版本的跨文化适应、信度和效度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Feb 27;13:30. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0219-3.
2
Validation of a Spanish version of the Spine Functional Index.脊柱功能指数西班牙语版本的验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Jun 27;12:96. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-96.
3
The Spine Functional Index: development and clinimetric validation of a new whole-spine functional outcome measure.脊柱功能指数：一种新的全脊柱功能结局测量的制定和临床验证。
Spine J. 2019 Feb;19(2):e19-e27. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.055. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
4
Psychometric properties of the PROMIS physical function item bank in patients with spinal disorders.脊柱疾病患者 PROMIS 身体功能项目库的心理测量学特性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jan 15;39(2):158-63. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000097.
5
Patient-reported outcome measures in spine surgery.脊柱外科中的患者报告结局测量。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013 Feb;21(2):99-107. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-21-02-99.
6
A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain.一项关于全球腰痛患病率的系统评价。
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Jun;64(6):2028-37. doi: 10.1002/art.34347. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
7
Assessing dimensionality and responsiveness of outcomes measures for patients with low back pain.评估腰痛患者结局测量指标的维度和反应度。
Pain Pract. 2011 Jan-Feb;11(1):57-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2010.00390.x.
8
Prevalence, practice patterns, and evidence for chronic neck pain.慢性颈痛的患病率、治疗模式和证据。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Nov;62(11):1594-601. doi: 10.1002/acr.20270. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
9
Rasch analysis provides new insights into the measurement properties of the neck disability index.拉施分析为颈部功能障碍指数的测量特性提供了新的见解。
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Apr 15;61(4):544-51. doi: 10.1002/art.24399.
10
The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index.从患者角度看脊柱手术的质量：第2部分。用核心结局指标指数衡量改善和恶化的最小临床重要差异
Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):374-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0931-y. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
Zotero 插件