Arp H P H, Brown T N, Berger U, Hale S E
Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Postboks 3930 Ullevål Stadion, NO-0806 Oslo, Norway.
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2017 Jul 19;19(7):939-955. doi: 10.1039/c7em00158d.
The contaminants that have the greatest chances of appearing in drinking water are those that are mobile enough in the aquatic environment to enter drinking water sources and persistent enough to survive treatment processes. Herein a screening procedure to rank neutral, ionizable and ionic organic compounds for being persistent and mobile organic compounds (PMOCs) is presented and applied to the list of industrial substances registered under the EU REACH legislation as of December 2014. This comprised 5155 identifiable, unique organic structures. The minimum cut-off criteria considered for PMOC classification herein are a freshwater half-life >40 days, which is consistent with the REACH definition of freshwater persistency, and a log D < 4.5 between pH 4-10 (where D is the organic carbon-water distribution coefficient). Experimental data were given the highest priority, followed by data from an array of available quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs), and as a third resort, an original Iterative Fragment Selection (IFS) QSAR. In total, 52% of the unique REACH structures made the minimum criteria to be considered a PMOC, and 21% achieved the highest PMOC ranking (half-life > 40 days, log D < 1.0 between pH 4-10). Only 9% of neutral substances received the highest PMOC ranking, compared to 30% of ionizable compounds and 44% of ionic compounds. Predicted hydrolysis products for all REACH parents (contributing 5043 additional structures) were found to have higher PMOC rankings than their parents, due to increased mobility but not persistence. The fewest experimental data available were for ionic compounds; therefore, their ranking is more uncertain than neutral and ionizable compounds. The most sensitive parameter for the PMOC ranking was freshwater persistency, which was also the parameter that QSARs performed the most poorly at predicting. Several prioritized drinking water contaminants in the EU and USA, and other contaminants of concern, were identified as PMOCs. This identification and ranking procedure for PMOCs can be part of a strategy to better identify contaminants that pose a threat to drinking water sources.
最有可能出现在饮用水中的污染物是那些在水生环境中具有足够的迁移性从而能够进入饮用水源,并且具有足够的持久性从而能够在处理过程中存活下来的污染物。本文提出了一种筛选程序,用于对持久性和迁移性有机化合物(PMOCs)中的中性、可离子化和离子型有机化合物进行排名,并将其应用于截至2014年12月根据欧盟化学品注册、评估、授权和限制法规(REACH)注册的工业物质清单。这包括5155种可识别的独特有机结构。本文中考虑的PMOC分类的最低截止标准是淡水半衰期>40天,这与REACH法规中淡水持久性的定义一致,以及在pH值4 - 10之间log D < 4.5(其中D是有机碳 - 水分配系数)。实验数据被赋予最高优先级,其次是一系列可用的定量构效关系(QSARs)数据,作为第三选择的是原始的迭代片段选择(IFS)QSAR。总体而言,52%的独特REACH结构符合被视为PMOC的最低标准,21%达到了最高的PMOC排名(半衰期> 40天,在pH值4 - 10之间log D < 1.0)。只有9%的中性物质获得了最高的PMOC排名,相比之下,可离子化化合物为30%,离子型化合物为44%。发现所有REACH母体的预测水解产物(增加了5043种额外结构)由于迁移性增加而非持久性增加,其PMOC排名高于其母体。离子型化合物可用的实验数据最少;因此,它们的排名比中性和可离子化化合物更不确定。PMOC排名中最敏感的参数是淡水持久性,这也是QSARs在预测时表现最差的参数。欧盟和美国的几种优先饮用水污染物以及其他受关注的污染物被确定为PMOCs。这种PMOCs的识别和排名程序可以成为更好地识别对饮用水源构成威胁的污染物的策略的一部分。