• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人们在推特上热议寨卡病毒的哪些方面?一项关于其症状、治疗、传播及预防的探索性研究。

What Are People Tweeting About Zika? An Exploratory Study Concerning Its Symptoms, Treatment, Transmission, and Prevention.

作者信息

Miller Michele, Banerjee Tanvi, Muppalla Roopteja, Romine William, Sheth Amit

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, United States.

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Jun 19;3(2):e38. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.7157.

DOI:10.2196/publichealth.7157
PMID:28630032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5495967/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In order to harness what people are tweeting about Zika, there needs to be a computational framework that leverages machine learning techniques to recognize relevant Zika tweets and, further, categorize these into disease-specific categories to address specific societal concerns related to the prevention, transmission, symptoms, and treatment of Zika virus.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the relevancy of the tweets and what people were tweeting about the 4 disease characteristics of Zika: symptoms, transmission, prevention, and treatment.

METHODS

A combination of natural language processing and machine learning techniques was used to determine what people were tweeting about Zika. Specifically, a two-stage classifier system was built to find relevant tweets about Zika, and then the tweets were categorized into 4 disease categories. Tweets in each disease category were then examined using latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) to determine the 5 main tweet topics for each disease characteristic.

RESULTS

Over 4 months, 1,234,605 tweets were collected. The number of tweets by males and females was similar (28.47% [351,453/1,234,605] and 23.02% [284,207/1,234,605], respectively). The classifier performed well on the training and test data for relevancy (F1 score=0.87 and 0.99, respectively) and disease characteristics (F1 score=0.79 and 0.90, respectively). Five topics for each category were found and discussed, with a focus on the symptoms category.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate how categories of discussion on Twitter about an epidemic can be discovered so that public health officials can understand specific societal concerns within the disease-specific categories. Our two-stage classifier was able to identify relevant tweets to enable more specific analysis, including the specific aspects of Zika that were being discussed as well as misinformation being expressed. Future studies can capture sentiments and opinions on epidemic outbreaks like Zika virus in real time, which will likely inform efforts to educate the public at large.

摘要

背景

为了利用人们在推特上发布的有关寨卡病毒的信息,需要一个计算框架,该框架利用机器学习技术来识别相关的寨卡病毒推文,并进一步将这些推文分类到特定疾病类别中,以解决与寨卡病毒预防、传播、症状和治疗相关的特定社会问题。

目的

本研究的目的是确定推文的相关性以及人们在推特上发布的有关寨卡病毒四个疾病特征(症状、传播、预防和治疗)的内容。

方法

结合自然语言处理和机器学习技术来确定人们在推特上发布的有关寨卡病毒的内容。具体而言,构建了一个两阶段分类器系统来查找有关寨卡病毒的相关推文,然后将这些推文分类到4个疾病类别中。然后使用潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA)对每个疾病类别的推文进行检查,以确定每个疾病特征的5个主要推文主题。

结果

在4个月的时间里,共收集到1,234,605条推文。男性和女性发布的推文数量相似(分别为28.47%[351,453/1,234,605]和23.02%[284,207/1,234,605])。该分类器在相关性的训练和测试数据上表现良好(F1分数分别为0.87和0.99)以及疾病特征方面(F1分数分别为0.79和0.90)。每个类别都发现并讨论了5个主题,重点是症状类别。

结论

我们展示了如何发现推特上关于一种流行病的讨论类别,以便公共卫生官员能够了解特定疾病类别中的具体社会问题。我们的两阶段分类器能够识别相关推文,以便进行更具体的分析,包括正在讨论的寨卡病毒的具体方面以及所表达的错误信息。未来的研究可以实时捕捉对寨卡病毒等疫情爆发的情绪和观点,这可能会为向广大公众进行教育的努力提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/489a/5495967/6f6bc121d466/publichealth_v3i2e38_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/489a/5495967/7f8587b4f687/publichealth_v3i2e38_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/489a/5495967/a62b60deed97/publichealth_v3i2e38_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/489a/5495967/c0de85c9b0d2/publichealth_v3i2e38_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/489a/5495967/4ea434a9d1a9/publichealth_v3i2e38_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/489a/5495967/c64c232d4f30/publichealth_v3i2e38_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/489a/5495967/6f6bc121d466/publichealth_v3i2e38_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/489a/5495967/7f8587b4f687/publichealth_v3i2e38_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/489a/5495967/a62b60deed97/publichealth_v3i2e38_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/489a/5495967/c0de85c9b0d2/publichealth_v3i2e38_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/489a/5495967/4ea434a9d1a9/publichealth_v3i2e38_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/489a/5495967/c64c232d4f30/publichealth_v3i2e38_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/489a/5495967/6f6bc121d466/publichealth_v3i2e38_fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
What Are People Tweeting About Zika? An Exploratory Study Concerning Its Symptoms, Treatment, Transmission, and Prevention.人们在推特上热议寨卡病毒的哪些方面?一项关于其症状、治疗、传播及预防的探索性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Jun 19;3(2):e38. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.7157.
2
Identifying Key Topics Bearing Negative Sentiment on Twitter: Insights Concerning the 2015-2016 Zika Epidemic.识别推特上带有负面情绪的关键话题:关于2015 - 2016年寨卡疫情的见解
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019 Jun 4;5(2):e11036. doi: 10.2196/11036.
3
Dynamics of Health Agency Response and Public Engagement in Public Health Emergency: A Case Study of CDC Tweeting Patterns During the 2016 Zika Epidemic.公共卫生紧急事件中卫生机构应对与公众参与的动态:以2016年寨卡疫情期间美国疾病控制与预防中心的推文模式为例
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018 Nov 22;4(4):e10827. doi: 10.2196/10827.
4
Identifying Influential Factors in the Discussion Dynamics of Emerging Health Issues on Social Media: Computational Study.识别社交媒体上新兴健康问题讨论动态中的影响因素:计算研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Jul 28;6(3):e17175. doi: 10.2196/17175.
5
Public Discussion of Anthrax on Twitter: Using Machine Learning to Identify Relevant Topics and Events.Twitter 上炭疽杆菌的公共讨论:使用机器学习识别相关主题和事件。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jun 18;7(6):e27976. doi: 10.2196/27976.
6
Classification of Twitter Users Who Tweet About E-Cigarettes.发布关于电子烟推文的推特用户分类。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Sep 26;3(3):e63. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.8060.
7
Using Twitter to Understand the Human Bowel Disease Community: Exploratory Analysis of Key Topics.利用推特了解人类肠道疾病群体:关键主题的探索性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 15;21(8):e12610. doi: 10.2196/12610.
8
Enhancing Seasonal Influenza Surveillance: Topic Analysis of Widely Used Medicinal Drugs Using Twitter Data.加强季节性流感监测:利用推特数据对广泛使用的药物进行主题分析
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 12;19(9):e315. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7393.
9
Discovering explanatory models to identify relevant tweets on Zika.发现用于识别寨卡相关推文的解释模型。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017 Jul;2017:1194-1197. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037044.
10
Results and Methodological Implications of the Digital Epidemiology of Prescription Drug References Among Twitter Users: Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) Analyses.社交媒体中文药物信息的数字流行病学研究结果与方法学启示:潜在狄利克雷分配模型(LDA)分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 28;25:e48405. doi: 10.2196/48405.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of Digital Tools in Arbovirus Surveillance: Scoping Review.数字工具在虫媒病毒监测中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 18;26:e57476. doi: 10.2196/57476.
2
"Are you listening?": Experiences shared online by family caregivers of patients in the palliative phase during the Covid-19-pandemic.“你在听吗?”:在新冠疫情期间,处于姑息治疗阶段的患者的家庭照护者在网上分享的经验。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 14;19(11):e0310624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310624. eCollection 2024.
3
Patient Experiences and Insights on Chronic Ocular Pain: Social Media Listening Study.

本文引用的文献

1
How people react to Zika virus outbreaks on Twitter? A computational content analysis.人们在推特上如何应对寨卡病毒爆发?一项计算内容分析。
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Dec 1;44(12):1700-1702. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.04.253. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
2
Identifying the public's concerns and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's reactions during a health crisis: An analysis of a Zika live Twitter chat.确定公众在健康危机期间的担忧以及疾病控制与预防中心的反应:对一次寨卡病毒推特实时聊天的分析
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Dec 1;44(12):1709-1711. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.05.025. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
3
Utilizing Nontraditional Data Sources for Near Real-Time Estimation of Transmission Dynamics During the 2015-2016 Colombian Zika Virus Disease Outbreak.
慢性眼痛患者的经历与见解:社交媒体倾听研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Feb 15;8:e47245. doi: 10.2196/47245.
4
Multiple-Perspective Data-Driven Analysis of Online Health Communities.在线健康社区的多视角数据驱动分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 12;11(20):2723. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202723.
5
Content and sentiment surveillance (CSI): A critical component for modeling modern epidemics.内容和情感监测(CSI):建模现代流行病的关键组成部分。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 16;11:1111661. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1111661. eCollection 2023.
6
User-Chatbot Conversations During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Study Based on Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis.用户-聊天机器人在 COVID-19 大流行期间的对话:基于主题建模和情感分析的研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 27;25:e40922. doi: 10.2196/40922.
7
Entomological Surveillance of the Invasive Aedes Species at Higher-Priority Entry Points in Northern Iran: Exploratory Report on a Field Study.伊朗北部高优先级入境点入侵伊蚊种的昆虫学监测:实地研究探索性报告。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Oct 31;8(10):e38647. doi: 10.2196/38647.
8
Smartphone clip-on instrument and microfluidic processor for rapid sample-to-answer detection of Zika virus in whole blood using spatial RT-LAMP.智能手机夹式仪器和微流控处理器,用于使用空间 RT-LAMP 快速对全血中的寨卡病毒进行样本到答案的检测。
Analyst. 2022 Aug 22;147(17):3838-3853. doi: 10.1039/d2an00438k.
9
Using social media listening and data mining to understand travellers' perspectives on travel disease risks and vaccine-related attitudes and behaviours.利用社交媒体监听和数据挖掘来了解旅行者对旅行疾病风险以及疫苗相关态度和行为的看法。
J Travel Med. 2022 Mar 21;29(2). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taac009.
10
Multilingual topic modeling for tracking COVID-19 trends based on Facebook data analysis.基于Facebook数据分析的多语言主题建模用于追踪COVID-19趋势
Appl Intell (Dordr). 2021;51(5):3052-3073. doi: 10.1007/s10489-020-02033-3. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
利用非传统数据源实时估计 2015-2016 年哥伦比亚寨卡病毒病疫情期间的传播动态。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016 Jun 1;2(1):e30. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.5814.
4
Zika virus infection-the next wave after dengue?寨卡病毒感染——继登革热之后的下一波疫情?
J Formos Med Assoc. 2016 Apr;115(4):226-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
5
Ebola, Twitter, and misinformation: a dangerous combination?埃博拉、推特与错误信息:危险组合?
BMJ. 2014 Oct 14;349:g6178. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6178.
6
Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.组内一致性:kappa 统计量。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82.
7
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.分类数据观察者一致性的测量。
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74.