• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体中文药物信息的数字流行病学研究结果与方法学启示:潜在狄利克雷分配模型(LDA)分析。

Results and Methodological Implications of the Digital Epidemiology of Prescription Drug References Among Twitter Users: Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) Analyses.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.

Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 28;25:e48405. doi: 10.2196/48405.

DOI:10.2196/48405
PMID:37505795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10422173/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social media is an important information source for a growing subset of the population and can likely be leveraged to provide insight into the evolving drug overdose epidemic. Twitter can provide valuable insight into trends, colloquial information available to potential users, and how networks and interactivity might influence what people are exposed to and how they engage in communication around drug use.

OBJECTIVE

This exploratory study was designed to investigate the ways in which unsupervised machine learning analyses using natural language processing could identify coherent themes for tweets containing substance names.

METHODS

This study involved harnessing data from Twitter, including large-scale collection of brand name (N=262,607) and street name (N=204,068) prescription drug-related tweets and use of unsupervised machine learning analyses (ie, natural language processing) of collected data with data visualization to identify pertinent tweet themes. Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) with coherence score calculations was performed to compare brand (eg, OxyContin) and street (eg, oxys) name tweets.

RESULTS

We found people discussed drug use differently depending on whether a brand name or street name was used. Brand name categories often contained political talking points (eg, border, crime, and political handling of ongoing drug mitigation strategies). In contrast, categories containing street names occasionally referenced drug misuse, though multiple social uses for a term (eg, Sonata) muddled topic clarity.

CONCLUSIONS

Content in the brand name corpus reflected discussion about the drug itself and less often reflected personal use. However, content in the street name corpus was notably more diverse and resisted simple LDA categorization. We speculate this may reflect effective use of slang terminology to clandestinely discuss drug-related activity. If so, straightforward analyses of digital drug-related communication may be more difficult than previously assumed. This work has the potential to be used for surveillance and detection of harmful drug use information. It also might be used for appropriate education and dissemination of information to persons engaged in drug use content on Twitter.

摘要

背景

社交媒体是越来越多人群的重要信息来源,可利用其来深入了解不断演变的药物过量流行情况。Twitter 可以提供有关趋势的有价值的见解,提供潜在用户可获得的通俗信息,以及网络和交互性如何影响人们接触到的内容以及他们如何围绕药物使用进行交流。

目的

本探索性研究旨在调查使用自然语言处理进行无监督机器学习分析的方法,以识别包含物质名称的推文的连贯主题。

方法

本研究涉及利用来自 Twitter 的数据,包括对品牌名(N=262607)和街头名(N=204068)处方药物相关推文的大规模收集,并使用无监督机器学习分析(即自然语言处理)对收集的数据进行可视化,以识别相关推文主题。进行潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA)和连贯性得分计算,以比较品牌(例如奥施康定)和街头(例如 oxy)名称的推文。

结果

我们发现,人们根据使用的是品牌名还是街头名而以不同的方式讨论药物使用情况。品牌名称类别通常包含政治话题(例如,边境、犯罪和对正在进行的药物缓解策略的政治处理)。相比之下,包含街头名称的类别偶尔会提到药物滥用,但术语的多种社会用途(例如,Sonata)使主题的清晰度变得混乱。

结论

品牌名称语料库中的内容反映了对药物本身的讨论,而很少反映个人使用情况。但是,街头名称语料库中的内容明显更加多样化,难以进行简单的 LDA 分类。我们推测这可能反映了使用俚语术语来秘密讨论与药物相关的活动。如果是这样,那么对数字药物相关交流的直接分析可能比以前假设的要困难。这项工作有可能用于监测和检测有害药物使用信息。它也可以用于向在 Twitter 上从事药物使用内容的人进行适当的教育和信息传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5196/10422173/aad9f16538d2/jmir_v25i1e48405_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5196/10422173/f0462d1b01b3/jmir_v25i1e48405_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5196/10422173/0a7476fa7356/jmir_v25i1e48405_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5196/10422173/44fa14a7b25b/jmir_v25i1e48405_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5196/10422173/f0119c6f50b7/jmir_v25i1e48405_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5196/10422173/aad9f16538d2/jmir_v25i1e48405_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5196/10422173/f0462d1b01b3/jmir_v25i1e48405_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5196/10422173/0a7476fa7356/jmir_v25i1e48405_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5196/10422173/44fa14a7b25b/jmir_v25i1e48405_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5196/10422173/f0119c6f50b7/jmir_v25i1e48405_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5196/10422173/aad9f16538d2/jmir_v25i1e48405_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Results and Methodological Implications of the Digital Epidemiology of Prescription Drug References Among Twitter Users: Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) Analyses.社交媒体中文药物信息的数字流行病学研究结果与方法学启示:潜在狄利克雷分配模型(LDA)分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 28;25:e48405. doi: 10.2196/48405.
2
Digital Epidemiology of Prescription Drug References on X (Formerly Twitter): Neural Network Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis.X(前身为 Twitter)上处方药引用的数字流行病学:神经网络主题建模和情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 23;26:e57885. doi: 10.2196/57885.
3
Social media mining for birth defects research: A rule-based, bootstrapping approach to collecting data for rare health-related events on Twitter.社交媒体挖掘在出生缺陷研究中的应用:一种基于规则和自举的方法,用于在 Twitter 上收集罕见健康相关事件的数据。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Nov;87:68-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
4
Exploring trends of nonmedical use of prescription drugs and polydrug abuse in the Twittersphere using unsupervised machine learning.使用无监督机器学习探索推特圈中处方药非医疗用途和多药滥用的趋势。
Addict Behav. 2017 Feb;65:289-295. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.08.019. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
5
Applying Multiple Data Collection Tools to Quantify Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Communication on Twitter.应用多种数据收集工具量化推特上的人乳头瘤病毒疫苗传播情况
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 5;18(12):e318. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6670.
6
Using Natural Language Processing to Explore "Dry January" Posts on Twitter: Longitudinal Infodemiology Study.使用自然语言处理技术探索 Twitter 上关于“干一月”的帖子:纵向信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 18;24(11):e40160. doi: 10.2196/40160.
7
Establishing a Link Between Prescription Drug Abuse and Illicit Online Pharmacies: Analysis of Twitter Data.建立处方药滥用与非法在线药房之间的联系:推特数据的分析
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 16;17(12):e280. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5144.
8
Using Tweets to Understand How COVID-19-Related Health Beliefs Are Affected in the Age of Social Media: Twitter Data Analysis Study.利用推文了解社交媒体时代 COVID-19 相关健康信念如何受到影响:推特数据分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 22;23(2):e26302. doi: 10.2196/26302.
9
Twitter Discussions and Emotions About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Machine Learning Approach.关于新冠疫情的推特讨论与情绪:机器学习方法
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 25;22(11):e20550. doi: 10.2196/20550.
10
Epidemiology from Tweets: Estimating Misuse of Prescription Opioids in the USA from Social Media.推特中的流行病学:通过社交媒体估算美国处方阿片类药物的滥用情况
J Med Toxicol. 2017 Dec;13(4):278-286. doi: 10.1007/s13181-017-0625-5. Epub 2017 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing Themes, Sentiments, and Coping Strategies Regarding Online News Coverage of Depression in Hong Kong: Mixed Methods Study.分析香港抑郁症在线新闻报道的主题、情感及应对策略:混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 13;27:e66696. doi: 10.2196/66696.
2
Digital Epidemiology of Prescription Drug References on X (Formerly Twitter): Neural Network Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis.X(前身为 Twitter)上处方药引用的数字流行病学:神经网络主题建模和情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 23;26:e57885. doi: 10.2196/57885.
3
Understanding public perceptions and discussions on diseases involving chronic pain through social media: cross-sectional infodemiology study.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying accurate pro-choice and pro-life identity labels in Spanish: Social media insights and implications for comparative survey research.识别西班牙语中准确的支持选择和支持生命的身份标签:社交媒体的洞察及其对比较调查研究的影响。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2022 Dec;54(4):166-176. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12208. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
2
#TurntTrending: a systematic review of substance use portrayals on social media platforms.#Turning Trends:社交媒体平台上物质使用呈现方式的系统评价
Addiction. 2023 Feb;118(2):206-217. doi: 10.1111/add.16020. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
3
Declining well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic reveals US social inequities.
通过社交媒体了解公众对涉及慢性疼痛疾病的看法和讨论:横断面信息流行病学研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jul 22;25(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07687-5.
新冠疫情期间幸福感下降揭示了美国的社会不平等。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 8;16(7):e0254114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254114. eCollection 2021.
4
The rise of illicit fentanyls, stimulants and the fourth wave of the opioid overdose crisis.非法芬太尼、兴奋剂的兴起和阿片类药物过量危机的第四波。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 1;34(4):344-350. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000717.
5
Language Bias in Health Research: External Factors That Influence Latent Language Patterns.健康研究中的语言偏见:影响潜在语言模式的外部因素。
Front Res Metr Anal. 2020 Aug 20;5:4. doi: 10.3389/frma.2020.00004. eCollection 2020.
6
Individuals with depression express more distorted thinking on social media.抑郁个体在社交媒体上表达出更多扭曲的想法。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):458-466. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01050-7. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
7
Social Media Insights Into US Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Analysis of Twitter Data.社交媒体洞察美国在 COVID-19 大流行期间的心理健康状况:对 Twitter 数据的纵向分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 14;22(12):e21418. doi: 10.2196/21418.
8
COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data.新冠疫情与5G阴谋论:基于推特数据的社交网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19458. doi: 10.2196/19458.
9
Exploring Substance Use Tweets of Youth in the United States: Mixed Methods Study.探索美国青少年的物质使用推文:混合方法研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Mar 26;6(1):e16191. doi: 10.2196/16191.
10
Twin epidemics: The surging rise of methamphetamine use in chronic opioid users.双重流行:慢性阿片类药物使用者中甲基苯丙胺使用的急剧上升。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Dec 1;193:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.08.029. Epub 2018 Oct 10.