• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A martingale analysis of first passage times of time-dependent Wiener diffusion models.时变维纳扩散模型首次通过时间的鞅分析
J Math Psychol. 2017 Apr;77:94-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
2
"Reliable organisms from unreliable components" revisited: the linear drift, linear infinitesimal variance model of decision making.“不可靠组件中的可靠生物”再探:决策的线性漂移、线性无穷小方差模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Aug;30(4):1323-1359. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02237-3. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
3
Review and implementation of cure models based on first hitting times for Wiener processes.基于维纳过程首次击中时间的治愈模型的回顾与实现
Lifetime Data Anal. 2009 Jun;15(2):147-76. doi: 10.1007/s10985-008-9108-y. Epub 2009 Jan 4.
4
Audiovisual detection at different intensities and delays.在不同强度和延迟条件下的视听检测。
J Math Psychol. 2019 Aug;91:159-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
5
Fast and accurate Monte Carlo sampling of first-passage times from Wiener diffusion models.来自维纳扩散模型的首次通过时间的快速准确蒙特卡罗采样。
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 11;6:20490. doi: 10.1038/srep20490.
6
Time-varying boundaries for diffusion models of decision making and response time.决策和反应时扩散模型的时变边界。
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 9;5:1364. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01364. eCollection 2014.
7
A Two-Stage Process Model of Sensory Discrimination: An Alternative to Drift-Diffusion.一种感觉辨别两阶段过程模型:漂移扩散模型的替代方案
J Neurosci. 2016 Nov 2;36(44):11259-11274. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1367-16.2016.
8
Sequential sampling models with variable boundaries and non-normal noise: A comparison of six models.具有可变边界和非正态噪声的序贯抽样模型:六种模型的比较。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Jun;26(3):813-832. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1560-4.
9
Survival probability and first-passage-time statistics of a Wiener process driven by an exponential time-dependent drift.由指数时间相关漂移驱动的维纳过程的生存概率和首次通过时间统计。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 Feb;83(2 Pt 1):021102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.021102. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
10
Relating a Spiking Neural Network Model and the Diffusion Model of Decision-Making.关联脉冲神经网络模型与决策扩散模型。
Comput Brain Behav. 2022 Sep;5(3):279-301. doi: 10.1007/s42113-022-00143-4. Epub 2022 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Asynchrony rescues statistically optimal group decisions from information cascades through emergent leaders.异步性通过涌现的领导者从信息级联中拯救了统计上最优的群体决策。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Mar 15;10(3):230175. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230175. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Mixing memory and desire: How memory reactivation supports deliberative decision-making.混合记忆与欲望:记忆再激活如何支持审慎决策。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2022 Mar;13(2):e1581. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1581. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
3
A flexible framework for simulating and fitting generalized drift-diffusion models.用于模拟和拟合广义漂移扩散模型的灵活框架。
Elife. 2020 Aug 4;9:e56938. doi: 10.7554/eLife.56938.
4
Amount and time exert independent influences on intertemporal choice.数量和时间对跨期选择有独立的影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Apr;3(4):383-392. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0537-2. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
5
Information Processing: The Language and Analytical Tools for Cognitive Psychology in the Information Age.信息处理:信息时代认知心理学的语言与分析工具
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 8;9:1270. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01270. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing fixed and collapsing boundary versions of the diffusion model.比较扩散模型的固定边界和塌缩边界版本。
J Math Psychol. 2016 Aug;73:59-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 May 24.
2
Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.扩散决策模型:当前问题与历史
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Apr;20(4):260-281. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
3
Using Covert Response Activation to Test Latent Assumptions of Formal Decision-Making Models in Humans.利用隐蔽反应激活来测试人类正式决策模型的潜在假设。
J Neurosci. 2015 Jul 15;35(28):10371-85. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0078-15.2015.
4
Efficient simulation of diffusion-based choice RT models on CPU and GPU.基于扩散的选择反应时模型在CPU和GPU上的高效模拟。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):13-27. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0569-0.
5
Time-varying boundaries for diffusion models of decision making and response time.决策和反应时扩散模型的时变边界。
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 9;5:1364. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01364. eCollection 2014.
6
Sequential sampling model for multiattribute choice alternatives with random attention time and processing order.具有随机注意时间和处理顺序的多属性选择替代方案的顺序抽样模型。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Sep 9;8:697. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00697. eCollection 2014.
7
Rats and humans can optimally accumulate evidence for decision-making.老鼠和人类都可以最优地积累决策的证据。
Science. 2013 Apr 5;340(6128):95-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1233912.
8
The cost of accumulating evidence in perceptual decision making.在知觉决策中积累证据的成本。
J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 14;32(11):3612-28. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4010-11.2012.
9
Diffusion models of the flanker task: discrete versus gradual attentional selection.Flanker 任务的扩散模型:离散与渐变注意选择。
Cogn Psychol. 2011 Dec;63(4):210-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
10
Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice.视觉注视与简单选择中的价值计算和比较。
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Oct;13(10):1292-8. doi: 10.1038/nn.2635. Epub 2010 Sep 12.

时变维纳扩散模型首次通过时间的鞅分析

A martingale analysis of first passage times of time-dependent Wiener diffusion models.

作者信息

Srivastava Vaibhav, Feng Samuel F, Cohen Jonathan D, Leonard Naomi Ehrich, Shenhav Amitai

机构信息

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Math Psychol. 2017 Apr;77:94-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmp.2016.10.001
PMID:28630524
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5473348/
Abstract

Research in psychology and neuroscience has successfully modeled decision making as a process of noisy evidence accumulation to a decision bound. While there are several variants and implementations of this idea, the majority of these models make use of a noisy accumulation between two absorbing boundaries. A common assumption of these models is that decision parameters, e.g., the rate of accumulation (drift rate), remain fixed over the course of a decision, allowing the derivation of analytic formulas for the probabilities of hitting the upper or lower decision threshold, and the mean decision time. There is reason to believe, however, that many types of behavior would be better described by a model in which the parameters were allowed to vary over the course of the decision process. In this paper, we use martingale theory to derive formulas for the mean decision time, hitting probabilities, and first passage time (FPT) densities of a Wiener process with time-varying drift between two time-varying absorbing boundaries. This model was first studied by Ratcliff (1980) in the two-stage form, and here we consider the same model for an arbitrary number of stages (i.e. intervals of time during which parameters are constant). Our calculations enable direct computation of mean decision times and hitting probabilities for the associated multistage process. We also provide a review of how martingale theory may be used to analyze similar models employing Wiener processes by re-deriving some classical results. In concert with a variety of numerical tools already available, the current derivations should encourage mathematical analysis of more complex models of decision making with time-varying evidence.

摘要

心理学和神经科学领域的研究已成功地将决策制定建模为一个向决策边界累积有噪声证据的过程。虽然这个想法有多种变体和实现方式,但这些模型中的大多数都利用了两个吸收边界之间的有噪声累积。这些模型的一个常见假设是,决策参数,例如累积速率(漂移率),在决策过程中保持固定,从而可以推导出关于达到上决策阈值或下决策阈值的概率以及平均决策时间的解析公式。然而,有理由相信,许多类型的行为可以通过一个允许参数在决策过程中变化的模型得到更好的描述。在本文中,我们使用鞅理论来推导在两个随时间变化的吸收边界之间具有时变漂移的维纳过程的平均决策时间、击中概率和首次通过时间(FPT)密度的公式。这个模型最初由拉特克利夫(1980)以两阶段形式进行研究,在这里我们考虑任意数量阶段(即参数保持恒定的时间间隔)的相同模型。我们的计算能够直接计算相关多阶段过程的平均决策时间和击中概率。我们还通过重新推导一些经典结果,回顾了如何使用鞅理论来分析采用维纳过程的类似模型。与现有的各种数值工具相结合,当前的推导应该会鼓励对具有时变证据的更复杂决策模型进行数学分析。